Re: Approved Backports: libgpod, rhythmbox (0.9.2)

looks like a new dbus dep is blocking Rhythmbox...On 1/3/06, Brian Puccio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 09:00 -0500, Brian Gurtler wrote:> how long until this hits the repository? >> James Troup wrote:>> >John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> >> >> >> >>rhythmbox is approved for

Re: Approved Backports: libgpod, rhythmbox (0.9.2)

On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 09:00 -0500, Brian Gurtler wrote: > how long until this hits the repository? > > James Troup wrote: > > >John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > >>rhythmbox is approved for backporting from Dapper to Breezy. It, however, > >>needs source package libgpod's debs

[Bug 6231] Kino 0.8 backport - not compiled with breezy/drapper libs

Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/6231 Comment: yes; it correctly locates the QT headers of the Dapper libquicktime. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

[Bug 6231] Kino 0.8 backport - not compiled with breezy/drapper libs

Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/6231 Comment: I have already requested for the backport to be pulled from the repositories. Sorry for the inconvenience. For those who've installed this backport, if you are unhappy with its performance, revert to the official Breezy pac

Re: Nzb backport to Breezy?

Looks good; in Dapper. My chroot is currently busy building a potential OOo 2.0.1 backport, so unless another backports dev can look at it for me, you're going to have to wait at least 24 hours until I can work on the request. On 1/3/06, Biagio® <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can or will someone make a

Pull Backport: kino

https://launchpad.net/products/breezy-backports/+bug/6231James, please remove the backport of kino from the Breezy backports repository. The Dapper package does not have tight enough dep checks to detect the change in quicktime library locations. Since the chances of convincing devs to make kino ch

[Bug 6231] Kino 0.8 backport - not compiled with breezy/drapper libs

Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/6231 Comment: http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/libq/libquicktime/libquicktime_0.9.7-0.4ubuntu1/changelog QUOTE: * debian/lqt_compat_header.stub: Template for compatibility headers to facilitate the move from /usr/

Nzb backport to Breezy?

Can or will someone make a backport of "nzb" to Breezy? -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

Re: Approved Backport: mplayerplug-in

John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > mplayerplug-in is approved for breezy-backports -- there are enough new > features in this release to warrant a backport. Done -- James -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-ba

Approved Backport: mplayerplug-in

mplayerplug-in is approved for breezy-backports -- there are enough new features in this release to warrant a backport. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

Re: Approved Backport: easychem

Martin Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > easychem 0.6-0ubuntu1 approved for backporting Done -- James -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

Re: Approved Backport: gajim

John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > gajim approved for backporting. Done -- James -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

Re: Approved Backport: Kaffeine

John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > kaffeine approved for backporting to Breezy. This seems to resolve an issue > with sigabrt's while using the Xine backend. Done -- James -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-b

Re: Amarok - latest dapper backport

Martin Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Requesting latest amarok package to be backported to breezy Done. -- James -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

Re: Approved Backports: libgpod, rhythmbox (0.9.2)

how long until this hits the repository? James Troup wrote: >John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >>rhythmbox is approved for backporting from Dapper to Breezy. It, however, >>needs source package libgpod's debs in order to build and install. Since >>this is a new library in Dapper, it's