Public bug reported:
Hi
Epiphany 2.17.2 has just been released. It's mainly a bug fix release
including a fix for bug: 350053: keyword search doesn't work which is a
PITA.
Thanks
** Affects: edgy-backports (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Epiphany 2.17.2
Builds successfully for me with prevu...
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
--
Epiphany 2.17.2
https://launchpad.net/bugs/70720
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
The browser runs fine, too... However, extensions are not yet packaged
for this new version... it might be best to wait for extensions.
--
Epiphany 2.17.2
https://launchpad.net/bugs/70720
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Who ACKed this backport request? I certainly didn't.
** Changed in: mplayerplug-in (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info
--
mozilla-mplayer edgy backport on dapper don't work
https://launchpad.net/bugs/70784
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
builds in prevu
and installs just fine and runs fine
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
--
apcupsd There are many bug fixes since 3.12.1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/55432
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: dpatch intltool libart-2.0-dev
(= 2.3.10) libgc-dev (= 1:6.7-1) libgnomevfs2-dev libgtkmm-2.4-dev
libperl-dev libpopt-dev libsigc++-2.0-dev (= 2.0.16-2) libtool libxslt1-dev
python-dev
W: Unmet build-dependency in source
** Changed in:
i would defently like to see this done too
--
Please backport MPlayer 1.0pre8 And mplayerplug-in-3.31 to dapper-backports
https://launchpad.net/bugs/62186
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
works for me just fine with the dapper ver i am d/l from some utorrent
clients and bitcomet clients too
--
Two patches from upstream SVN
https://launchpad.net/bugs/70529
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
John Dong wrote:
Firefox's official binaries are quite simple to unpack into a home
directory and create a launcher It doesn't take much effort at
all to set up your own Firefox 2.0.
John Dong wrote:
it's not technically feasible
Does anyone besides me find the above two statements
On 11/8/06, dsurber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Dong wrote:
Firefox's official binaries are quite simple to unpack into a home
directory and create a launcher It doesn't take much effort at
all to set up your own Firefox 2.0.
John Dong wrote:
it's not technically feasible
Does
So can this bug be reassigned to what ever project would have the scope
and authority to create a firefox2 program that doesn't fight with the
system's Firefox 1.5? I punt bugs to other groups all the time.
--
Firefox 2.0
https://launchpad.net/bugs/68158
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
Thanks.
Douglas
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 06:06 +, John Dong wrote:
Punting bug back to Ubuntu developers due to insistence of users...
Please give an official statement regarding Firefox 2.0 in Dapper
** Also affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
Hi there Douglas.
As John's stated, it's not possible to backport firefox without
backporting a lot of different applications with it.
These applications depend on having certain versions of system libraries
in certain places.
The way backports works is to update packages and replace them, not
Public bug reported:
Builds fine on edgy, approved for backport
** Affects: edgy-backports (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Backport katapult 0.3.1.4
https://launchpad.net/bugs/70847
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
14 matches
Mail list logo
