We have 0.1.2.17 in Gutsy now, so it could be backported to Feisty if
someone would test that
** Changed in: feisty-backports
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
tor needs to be updated because more and more nodes are starting to reject this
outdated version
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Agreed. Backporting fai 3.2 makes a lot more sense.
** Changed in: dapper-backports
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Changed in: feisty-backports
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
FAI kernel does not include working bnx2 driver (Broadcom, Dell)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151654
You rec
We will not be backporting this to Feisty.
** Changed in: gparted (Baltix)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: feisty-backports
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
Upgrade GParted to version 0.33
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/81185
You received this bug notification because y
* Trying to backport scribes...
-
-
-
I: Extracting scribes_0.3.2.9-1.dsc ... done.
I: Building backport of scribes-0.3.2.9 as 0.3.2.9-1~feisty1 ... done.
** Changed in: feisty-backports
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
Please backport scribes for feisty
https://bugs.la
* Trying to backport gnucash...
-
-
-
I: Extracting gnucash_2.2.1-1ubuntu4.dsc ... done.
I: Building backport of gnucash-2.2.1 as 2.2.1-1ubuntu4~feisty1 ... done.
** Changed in: feisty-backports
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
Backport GnuCash 2.2.1
https://bugs.launch
NB that for such cases, two tasks are better than two separate bugs.
--
Backport GnuCash 2.2.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148306
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
* Trying to backport gnucash-docs...
-
-
-
I: Extracting gnucash-docs_2.2.0-1.dsc ... done.
I: Building backport of gnucash-docs-2.2.0 as 2.2.0-1~feisty1 ... done.
** Changed in: feisty-backports
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
Backport GnuCash-Docs 2.2.x to Feisty
htt
Feisty: fai 3.1.8 has two problems:
1) fai kernel version != distro version. So endless, e.g. hda versus sda
trouble
2) fai softupdate does not work
So I would suggest for feisty update/backport fai to 3.2.1, instead of
spending time with the obsolete fai-kernels.
Feisty (and Dapper) backpo
gusty: fai > 3.2 does not need a special fai-kernels anymore. And the pkgs is
removed from archive.
therefore I mark the bug as invalid for gutsy.
** Changed in: fai-kernels (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
FAI kernel does not include working bnx2 driver (Broadcom, Dell)
https://bugs.
Alvin Cura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Binary package hint: fai-kernels
>
> Feisty FAI kernel is based on 2.6.17. bnx2 driver is not present.
>
> Attempted a rebuild with linux-source-2.6.20. Driver is present in
> source tree.
>
> Gutsy FAI kernel should include this.
10 matches
Mail list logo