I was able to build python-django version 1.0.2-1: I'd only to backport
jquery (1.2.6-1) and sphinx (0.5-1) without any changes!
--
Please backport django 1.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267305
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team,
Le samedi 03 janvier 2009 à 04:24 +, Shirish Agarwal a écrit :
Hi Jean Levasseur,
Had come to know other day that transmission 1.40 has few bugs
and some critical ones (major regressions) at that. Its 1.42 which is
supposed to be good one.
I would refer you to this thread
Closing...now is available in the i386 repository!
** Changed in: hardy-backports
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
please backport boinc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277690
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is
Now builds fine without any changes (debhelper 7 is just in Hardy
backports). No reverse dependecies.
--
please backport sphinx 0.4.2-1 from Intrepid to Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291825
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team,
I confirm that it build and install under Hardy; I don't know how to
test if it works fine, but I think that it is safe to backport because
there are no reverse dependencies...
--
please backport jquery 1.2.3-4 from Intrepid to Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291800
You received this bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 307239 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307239
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 307239
Please backport vlc to 0.9.8a in Intrepid
--
Backport 0.9.8a to Intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313626
You received this bug notification
I just noticed that with new 180.18 drivers the generated modaliases
file is bogus. This is because there are two very short consecutive
objects now (before the objects with pciids) and nvidia_supported thinks
it found it right. Attached is a debdiff that fixes the issue for now
(by ensuring that
** Summary changed:
- Please backport Ardour 2.5
+ Please backport Ardour 2.7.1
--
Please backport Ardour 2.7.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299287
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports.
--
I have successfully backported Ardour 2.7.1 to both hardy and intrepid.
The packages can be found in my ppa at
https://launchpad.net/~khashayar/+archive. I've also built them locally
using prevu. Minimal testing shows they work well on my machine.
For the intrepid backport, no change was
Redirecting to hardy-backports... Please see
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports for more information
on the backport process.
** Also affects: hardy-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
Please
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2008-3964
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2008-4654
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2008-4686
--
Please backport vlc to 0.9.8a in Intrepid
** Also affects: intrepid-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Please backport Ardour 2.7.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299287
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports.
--
I would like to also request this to be backported as it fixes the
keymap issue ( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=499696 )
which prevents me using any virtual machines through virt-manager due to
keys not functioning correctly. It is currently in Jaunty's
repositories.
--
please
Shouldn't Intrepid and Jaunty be at 2.6.4 since it's a bug fix? Or are
only security fixes pushed through without using a backport?
e.g. Firefox 3.0 beta 5 vs 3.0.5 in Hardy.
--
Please backport GIMP 2.6.3 from jaunty to intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305473
You received this bug
Hi Thierry,
Thanks for forwarding. Looking forward to the backporters' response.
_Yet_, can you tell me if v2.46 stands a chance of making it to the
regular LTS repos ?
I must stress again that this would be an important improvement for LTS.
To summarize:
- if any dnsmasq user wants /
This package installation has the side effect of rendering python-
setuptools dysfunctional. easy_install with a url that is a svn repo
will do a check out, but easy_install (part of python-setuptools) reads
the .svn files directly for some reason, and don't know that version #
of the format of
This was fixed in setuptools-0.6c9 release:
http://bugs.python.org/setuptools/issue4
So if we backport setuptools-0.6c9, I guess that would help.
setuptools 0.6c9 is entirely compatible with 0.6c8 (which is in Hardy),
and 0.6c9 is a very stable change, limited to fixes of known bugs in
0.6c8,
17 matches
Mail list logo