Public bug reported:
I'm not enough of an expert to know why this problem is happening,
whether it relates to backports or just plain jaunty, or which aspect of
synaptic is involved. It seems serious enough to need some expert
attention, so that's why the bug report. My system is a Core 2 Duo
P84
Backports ACK: 0.6-1 from karmic to jaunty-backports
** Changed in: jaunty-backports
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Changed in: jaunty-backports
Status: New => In Progress
--
Please backport arora 0.6-1 from karmic to jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372337
You received th
Public bug reported:
Please backport topgit 0.7 from karmic.
The karmic src package seems to build and run fine on hardy in my
initial testing.
** Affects: hardy-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Please backport topgit 0.7
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372414
You r
Public bug reported:
Builds cleanly in jaunty pbuilder. I've been using it for some time now.
** Affects: jaunty-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Please backport arora 0.6-1 from karmic to jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372337
You received this bug notificati
Setting as incomplete (based on Savvas comment)
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
[needs-packaging] PyTube - GUI video converter using mencoder, ffmpeg, mplayer
and more.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159901
You received this bug notification because you are a me
Actually, since debhelper 7 is in hardy-backports now, I guess even that
patch isn't needed, is it?
--
Please backport gitosis 0.2+20080825-2 from Jaunty to Hardy/Intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334538
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testin
Somebody needs to analyse the diff between the packages in bzr's PPA and
the packages in Karmic. We strongly prefer to backport from the Ubuntu
development branch where possible, not from a PPA.
The process is as follows:
* if the package in Karmic will build and work without changes (other than
