Jamie,
There is another option that 'simple users' might fall back to:
f) Use another operating system until there is a mended version of Sun
Java available for Ubuntu.
Unfortunately this negatively affects the quite good progress of Ubuntu
bug #1, and that is probably what is most disturbing of
I can confirm that on 32bit Karmic boxes aren't drawn right. It got a
little better when I turned compiz off, but not by much. However, I
don't honestly believe this minor bug should prevent the package from
entering Karmic. Get the package uploaded to REVU as soon as possible
(feature freeze is
I saw those when I tried it out, but I chalked it up to oddities with
the theme I was using.
Is the scrollbar present when you open one of the test documents? I
notice that it's missing.
I guess I'll take a look at the differences in the dependencies and see
if there the Jaunty version of gtk+ or
Aaaand again, it may just be my resolution, but many boxes seem to be drawn
too large.
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Thom Hastings
wrote:
> Edit: 32bit Karmic has issues with splash screen, boxes aren't drawn right.
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Thom Hastings wrote:
>
>> Ditto for 6
Edit: 32bit Karmic has issues with splash screen, boxes aren't drawn
right.
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Thom Hastings
wrote:
> Ditto for 64bit Jaunty + 32bit Karmic
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:13 PM, George Wright wrote:
>
>> I tested your build on a 32Bit Jaunty and it is working gre
Ditto for 64bit Jaunty + 32bit Karmic
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:13 PM, George Wright
wrote:
> I tested your build on a 32Bit Jaunty and it is working great so far.
> Thanks,
>
> 2009/8/24 Colin Dean
>
> > OK, folks. Celtx 2.0.1 has been built for both Jaunty and Karmic in the
> > associated PP
I tested your build on a 32Bit Jaunty and it is working great so far.
Thanks,
2009/8/24 Colin Dean
> OK, folks. Celtx 2.0.1 has been built for both Jaunty and Karmic in the
> associated PPA. Please install it and check it out. I want to propose it
> for Karmic as early as Monday night if it's ru
OK, folks. Celtx 2.0.1 has been built for both Jaunty and Karmic in the
associated PPA. Please install it and check it out. I want to propose it
for Karmic as early as Monday night if it's running fine.
--
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
https://bugs.laun
Pjotr,
This leaves you with:
a) using the workaround provided and installing sun-java6 packages from karmic.
You can also install the software directly from Sun. Although a poor choice for
Ubuntu in general, it gets you as a 'simple user' with the update.
b) figuring out how to build a package y
@Jamie Strandboge:
I understand your point, but where does that leave me, a simple end user with
no packaging skills at all? And more than half a million like me? Probably even
millions, if you count out the distortion from the popcon statistics?
This means that probably the vast majority of Ubu
This is a community matter. I asked that this be brought up in #ubuntu-
motu because there seems to be a lack of interest from the community to
maintain this package and I hoped that more people than those in this
bug could respond and help. No one did. People complain, but no one
wants to put in t
@Matthias Klose: please react to the questions that I asked you. It's a
vital matter. Thanks in advance.
@everyone: maybe we should consider mobilizing our LoCo Teams. I could
try to persuade the leadership of my LoCo Team, Ubuntu-NL (Netherlands
and Belgium) to put an official collective request
** Changed in: debian
Status: New => Fix Released
--
[needs-packaging] LiVES - Linux Video Editor System
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103616
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports.
--
ubuntu-
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 103616 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103616
** Changed in: debian
Status: New => Fix Released
--
[needs-packaging] lives
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230418
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Test
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 103616 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103616
** Changed in: debian
Status: New => Fix Released
--
[needs-packaging] LiVES - multitrack video editor and streamer & player
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260995
You received this bug notification b
@Matthias Klose:
But 6u15 *is* sufficient. Because Sun says in the Release Notes, that 6u16
doesn't contain security updates compared with 6u15:
http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/6u16.html
Essential quote:
Bug Fixes
This feature release does not contain any new fixes for security
vulnerabil
@Vistaus: As you can see at https://jdk-distros.dev.java.net/ 6u16 was
released. Updating to 6u15 isn't good enough. No, it's not packaged, and
I don't plan to do so. Looking at the Debian package you'll see that it
is now unsupported (orphaned), the package in Ubuntu is community
maintained. So ei
Great work!
Setting this as 'Won't fix'.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix
--
[needs-packaging] LiVES - Linux Video Editor System
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103616
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, wh
Package now in Debian sid main.
Sync requested. bug #417631
--
[needs-packaging] LiVES - Linux Video Editor System
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103616
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports.
--
ubu
Lutfi írta:
> I see Debian Lenny already have backport OpenOffice.org 3.1
> Here the link:
>
> http://tuxarena.blogspot.com/2009/08/how-to-install-openoffice-31-in-
> debian.html
>
> Any new for Hardy?
>
https://launchpad.net/~openoffice-pkgs/+archive/ppa ?
csola
--
ubuntu-backports mailing
20 matches
Mail list logo
