[Bug 487484] [NEW] [Backport Package] xz-utils

2009-11-24 Thread PauLoX
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Private security bug reported: Backports from Lucid. ** Affects: karmic-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [Backport Package] xz-utils https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487484 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 251435] Re: [needs-packaging] Minerva

2009-11-24 Thread Fox -ino
any news? -- [needs-packaging] Minerva https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251435 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings

[Bug 260848] Re: [needs-packaging] Minerva - 3D GIS with underground mapping

2009-11-24 Thread Fox -ino
any news? ** Changed in: gutsy-backports Status: Incomplete = Invalid ** Changed in: feisty-backports Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- [needs-packaging] Minerva - 3D GIS with underground mapping https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260848 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 487642] [NEW] Please backport rsyslogd

2009-11-24 Thread tobias.gruenewald
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 8.04. repositories include a really old version of rsyslogd. (1.x) Ubuntu 8.10. 9.04 and later include far newer versions (3.x or 4.x). For my setup I need some features only included in the newer releases. So I would really appreciate a backport. Updating to a newer

[Bug 487685] [NEW] Please backport Octave 3.2.3 to Karmic

2009-11-24 Thread rmcd
Public bug reported: Octave 3.2.2 is the version on Karmic. Octave 3.2.3 is a bug fix which is available for Lucid. ** Affects: karmic-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please backport Octave 3.2.3 to Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487685 You received this

[Bug 431157] Re: PostgreSQL 8.4.1 backport

2009-11-24 Thread Martin Pitt
Sorry, they were stuck in the NEW queue. Processed now. -- PostgreSQL 8.4.1 backport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431157 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list

[Bug 396384] Re: Please backport cython 0.11.2-1 from karmic to hardy, intrepid, jaunty

2009-11-24 Thread Evan Broder
** Summary changed: - Please backport cython 0.10.3-1build1 from karmic to hardy, intrepid + Please backport cython 0.11.2-1 from karmic to hardy, intrepid, jaunty ** Description changed: Cython seems to be slowly winning over Pyrex. - There is a build in my PPA

[Bug 487429] Re: please backport bzr 2.0.0 from karmic

2009-11-24 Thread John Dong
Oooh. Martin, we definitely want to take the opportunity to backport bzr 2.0.2 after-SRU and its entire stack to Jaunty. If the SRU seems to hit a snag or otherwise take too long, poke this bug report again and we'll take the 2.0.0 route (since as I understand it 2.0.2 can drop-in replace 2.0.0

[Bug 487484] Re: [Backport Package] xz-utils

2009-11-24 Thread John Dong
Can you elaborate on the rationale for this backport? -- [Backport Package] xz-utils https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487484 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list

[Bug 483060] Re: Backport Decibel Audio Player 1.01

2009-11-24 Thread John Dong
Thanks for the info. Testers, what are your opinions about the severity of this bug as far as user experience is concerned. Continue with backport or wait for 1.02? (Either way is fine with me) -- Backport Decibel Audio Player 1.01 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483060 You received this bug

[Bug 396384] Re: Please backport cython 0.11.2-1 from karmic to hardy, intrepid, jaunty

2009-11-24 Thread John Dong
I love it when things come pre-tested! ACK from MOT^H^H^H^^H wrong one, need more sleep. ACK from Backporters for all 3 distros. ** Changed in: jaunty-backports Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: intrepid-backports Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: hardy-backports

Re: [Bug 487429] Re: please backport bzr 2.0.0 from karmic

2009-11-24 Thread Martin Pool
2009/11/25 John Dong jd...@johndong.com: Oooh. Martin, we definitely want to take the opportunity to backport bzr 2.0.2 after-SRU and its entire stack to Jaunty. OK, thanks. If the SRU seems to hit a snag or otherwise take too long, poke this bug report again and we'll take the 2.0.0 route

[Bug 483060] Re: Backport Decibel Audio Player 1.01

2009-11-24 Thread s...@cracker
Thanks to all for having a look at it. I think it's better just to wait for DAP v1.02 even if it's not a major bug and more or less just annoying. -- Backport Decibel Audio Player 1.01 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 475347] Re: Bacula version 3.0.2 instead of version 2.4.4

2009-11-24 Thread Mario Sitz
It seems to be a problem with LDFLAGS. If you build the packages from source, the clients and console can connect to the director. $ dpkg-source -x bacula_3.0.2-3ubuntu1.dsc $ cd bacula-3.0.2 $ # Note the single space below for LDFLAGS $ LDFLAGS= dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -us so far