Is this really fixed in Karmic? Looking at the source package at
spamassassin-3.2.5/rules/72_active.cf I see
##{ FH_DATE_PAST_20XX
header FH_DATE_PAST_20XX Date =~ /20[1-9][0-9]/ [if-unset: 2006]
describe FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
##} FH_DATE_PAST_20XX
@Peter please, see
spamassassin-3.2.5/debian/patches/95_fix_FH_DATE_PAST_20XX.dpatch. The
file you're reading is the one coming from upstream.
OTOH, remember that you can update SA rules with sa-update command.
--
FH_DATE_PAST_20XX scores on all mails dated 2010 or later
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 06:46:53AM -, Peter Schwenke wrote:
Is this really fixed in Karmic? Looking at the source package at
spamassassin-3.2.5/rules/72_active.cf I see
##{ FH_DATE_PAST_20XX
header FH_DATE_PAST_20XX Date =~ /20[1-9][0-9]/ [if-unset: 2006]
describe
Sorry about the false alarm.
Thanks, Steve and Alex. I spotted the patch file a little while ago and
have been checking the package build. The build does the correct thing
and I see the correct file in built package. I had updated the rules
using sa-update earlier and the correct rule was
Yes. It's fixed.
--
FH_DATE_PAST_20XX scores on all mails dated 2010 or later
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502071
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
** Changed in: karmic-backports
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Please upgrade FlightGear to 2.0.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528986
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Karmic Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports
