pure-ftpd isn't in lucid-backports (or any other release's backports)
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748672
Title:
Anyone can test a backport.
Someone needs to test (a good selection of) the reverse dependencies of
pidgin to see if they aren't broken by the backport (build the
backported package and check if these package still work). If they are
broken then also try to backport those and then we can do it as
Ack. Approved by ubuntu-backporters.
** Changed in: natty-backports
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: natty-backports
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for
Ack. Approved by ubuntu-backporters.
** Changed in: natty-backports
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: natty-backports
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for
Ack. Approved by ubuntu-backporters.
** Changed in: natty-backports
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: natty-backports
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for
Ack. Approved by ubuntu-backporters.
** Changed in: natty-backports
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: natty-backports
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for
** Summary changed:
- [test-pkg-a] Please backport traverso to Lucid
+ [test-pkg-a] Please backport traverso 0.49.2-1 from Maverick to Lucid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
Hey,
Thanks for the request. I just took a look at this as part of backports-
revival... Would it be possible to backport ubuntu1 from maverick
instead? Otherwise ubuntu2 would have to be backported to all
intervening releases to provide a proper upgrade path.
Also, there are a few reverse
Thanks for the request.
squid has many reverse depends (apt-cache rdepends squid) — have you
tested any of these against the backported version?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
I tested a backport of the only rdepend, boinc-app-seti, too. b/i/r
** Summary changed:
- Please backport boinc
+ Please backport boinc and boinc-app-seti from Maverick to Lucid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to
** Summary changed:
- [test-pkg-a] Please backport codeblocks 10.05
+ Please backport codeblocks 10.05
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622836
Title:
Please backport
Smoke tested new versions on Maverick and Lucid. No-change backports to
both should be fine.
** Summary changed:
- [test-pkg-a] Please backport codelite 2.6.0.4189~dfsg-1
+ [test-pkg-a] Please backport codelite 2.8.0.4537~dfsg-1 from Natty to
Maverick and Lucid
** Also affects:
** Summary changed:
- [test-pkg-a] Please backport traverso 0.49.2-1 from Maverick to Lucid
+ Please backport traverso 0.49.2-1 from Maverick to Lucid
** Summary changed:
- Please backport traverso 0.49.2-1 from Maverick to Lucid
+ Please backport traverso to Lucid
--
You received this bug
I: Extracting kile_2.1.0~svn2010122beta5-1ubuntu1.dsc ... done.
I: Building backport of kile as 1:2.1.0~svn2010122beta5-1ubuntu1~natty1 ...
done.
** Changed in: natty-backports
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I: Extracting texmaker_3.0.2-2.dsc ... done.
I: Building backport of texmaker as 3.0.2-2~natty1 ... done.
** Changed in: natty-backports
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for
I: Extracting springpython_1.2.0+ds-2.dsc ... done.
I: Building backport of springpython as 1.2.0+ds-2~natty1 ... done.
** Changed in: natty-backports
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the
I: Extracting lintian_2.5.0~rc3ubuntu1.dsc ... done.
I: Building backport of lintian as 2.5.0~rc3ubuntu1~natty1 ... done.
** Changed in: natty-backports
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is
I: Extracting turpial_1.5.0~rc1-1.dsc ... done.
I: Building backport of turpial as 1.5.0~rc1-1~natty1 ... done.
** Changed in: natty-backports
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the
I: Extracting znc_0.092-3.dsc ... done.
I: Building backport of znc as 0.092-3~lucid1 ... done.
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to
I: Extracting keepass2_2.15+dfsg-2.dsc ... done.
I: Building backport of keepass2 as 2.15+dfsg-2~natty1 ... done.
** Changed in: natty-backports
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the
Since Ubuntu is currently getting this package unmodified from Debian,
that's probably the best place to ask this question.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779106
21 matches
Mail list logo
