Hi,
If the package was still present in quantal, this would be a normal
upload+backport, instead of an sru. But since it's not in quantal, can
the backport already present in precise-backports be updated, please?
The bugs fixed are not critical in the sense that they do not break
the
OK I uploaded and accepted it. I'm not sure about the version number (we
don't really have precedent for this), but it should be alright.
I'd really appreciate someone backporting these fixes to the precise
(release) package.
and you could use pgrep (from procps) instead of that ps | grep -v
Whoops, thanks.
Mentioned this in my bug about this in Debian.
I don't particularly like checking for the existence of
/etc/dpkg/origin/ubuntu. That exists on several of my Debian boxes...
One is really supposed to parse default... But of course, that's
painful. So, meh :)
--
You received this
It's not guaranteed to be shell. See bug 214861. I suggest borrowing
the lsb_extract shell function from localechooser instead.
(Sorry for lateness; although it seemed awfully familiar, it took my
associative memory quite a while to dredge this one up.)
--
You received this bug notification
Can you tell us if this bug is fixed in supported Ubuntu versions?
** Changed in: gutenprint (Baltix)
Status: New = Incomplete
** Changed in: gutenprint (Baltix)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters,
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Micah Gersten
launch...@micahscomputing.com wrote:
We've got a reverse dependency, can you please do an install/run test on
it?
reverse-depends src:exaile
Reverse-Depends
===
* remuco-exaile (for exaile)
Ug... So we do. Sadly,
