Root cause: https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/p7zip/+bug/1965855
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965800
Title:
debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386
Public bug reported:
The p7zip:i386 and p7zip-full:i386 packages are missing in focal.
The result is that debhelper in focal-backports cannot be used to build
i386 packages. It depends on debugedit:i386, which is missing, because
p7zip-full:i386 is a build dependency.
Please apply this patch to
You have been subscribed to a public bug by David Ward (dpward):
The p7zip:i386 and p7zip-full:i386 packages are missing in focal.
The result is that debhelper in focal-backports cannot be used to build
i386 packages. It depends on debugedit:i386, which is missing, because
p7zip-full:i386 is a bu
Public bug reported:
focal-backports contains debhelper 13.5.2ubuntu1~bpo20.04.1. This is an
architecture-independent package, but it depends on debugedit, which is
architecture-dependent.
The debugedit package exists in focal-universe for amd64, but not for
i386. As a result, Launchpad is not ab
You have been subscribed to a public bug by David Ward (dpward):
focal-backports contains debhelper 13.5.2ubuntu1~bpo20.04.1. This is an
architecture-independent package, but it depends on debugedit, which is
architecture-dependent.
The debugedit package exists in focal-universe for amd64, but no
Having looked at the versions of debhelper in play, and the versions
that introduced / fixed various bugs, my current reading of the
situation is as follows:
All current bionic and focal versions in release, updates, and backports
(11.1.6, 12.10, and 13.5.2) will be producing packages where the ol
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 10:43 AM Robie Basak wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 10:21:19AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> > The Ubuntu Backports team has drafted a Charter and we request that
> > you review it and, if you approve, please provide your approval
> > ("ratification") by email. If you h
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 10:21:19AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> The Ubuntu Backports team has drafted a Charter and we request that
> you review it and, if you approve, please provide your approval
> ("ratification") by email. If you have any concerns or comments,
> please let us know.
Related di
Then this should be trivial to backport, if you need it backported
waveform and you don't want to handle the actual backport uploads, I'll
take this on, I have some spare cycles today this afternoon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is su
Hello TB,
The Ubuntu Backports team has drafted a Charter and we request that
you review it and, if you approve, please provide your approval
("ratification") by email. If you have any concerns or comments,
please let us know.
Thanks.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubun
@teward: Mattia is right, at the moment only the -backports are
affected, as the bug was introduced in Jammy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758
Title:
[BPO] debhel
@teward: I'm pretty sure that bug only affects -backports: according to
the debian bug the commit introducing it is 6067bc2f, which was first
available in debhelper 13.4, which is only in jammy and -backports.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, w
tbf, I don't think this is actually *urgent* and can really just stay
there for another week.
** Summary changed:
- [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal
+ [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
waveform: Paride: given this bug, wouldn't this be more suited for full
SRU and rebuilds? I'm wondering whether this is truly a backportable
case because this requires rebuild of all affected packages, and if
anyone builds with debhelper in backports (which is NOT available in
standard build envs
Oh, that's probably a good reason to update the backport indeed, that
I've been procrastinating.
Unfortunately at this time I'm quite busy so I wouldn't be able to do it
before next Monday at the earliest. Personally I'm fine if somebody
else take it and I'll later review the diff; I don't expect
Whoops looks like we had some collission in terms of assignments.
Reassigning to waveform.
Once this is looked at and looks OK at the Canonical level, then the
Backports Team will take over backporting this. Keep in mind that since
the original Backports process is mostly scrapped, the Backports
Hmm, good point. This change ought to be back-ported and the same set of
packages rebuilt otherwise an LTS->LTS upgrade risks stopping vital
services like dbus too.
Assigning myself to have a look at this; looks like bionic and focal are
only one minor version behind so a back-port shouldn't be hu
** Description changed:
Please backport debhelper (>= 13.6ubuntu1) to Bionic and Focal.
Currently we have
debhelper | 13.5.2ubuntu1~bpo18.04.1| bionic-backports | source, all
debhelper | 13.5.2ubuntu1~bpo20.04.1| focal-backports | source, all
Those versions are affected
Looks good to me.
Thomas
On 3/21/22 08:55, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
(thanks for the prod on IRC)
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 04:33:05PM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
so, if i'm being totally pedantic, the exact version of the charter
and policies is:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports/Charter?a
Subscribing Dave Jones who looked at this for Jammy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758
Title:
[BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal
To manage no
Public bug reported:
Please backport debhelper (>= 13.6ubuntu1) to Bionic and Focal.
Currently we have
debhelper | 13.5.2ubuntu1~bpo18.04.1| bionic-backports | source, all
debhelper | 13.5.2ubuntu1~bpo20.04.1| focal-backports | source, all
Those versions are affected by LP: #1959054,
You have been subscribed to a public bug by Paride Legovini (paride):
Please backport debhelper (>= 13.6ubuntu1) to Bionic and Focal.
Currently we have
debhelper | 13.5.2ubuntu1~bpo18.04.1| bionic-backports | source, all
debhelper | 13.5.2ubuntu1~bpo20.04.1| focal-backports | source, a
(thanks for the prod on IRC)
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 04:33:05PM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
> so, if i'm being totally pedantic, the exact version of the charter
> and policies is:
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports/Charter?action=recall&rev=5
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports/Po
23 matches
Mail list logo
