[Bug 1992163] Re: [BPO] man-db/2.10.2-1 from jammy

2022-10-09 Thread Thomas Ward
Mattia: Big change or not, SRU team might let it through because it's a *performance bug fix*. This alone is not sufficient, in my opinion, for a backport, when an SRU is the process it should be going through because it fixes a bug - a performance one, granted, but it's still SRUable I believe.

[Bug 1992163] Re: [BPO] man-db/2.10.2-1 from jammy

2022-10-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
@teward: look at https://gitlab.com/cjwatson/man- db/-/merge_requests/2/diffs - it's quite the big change to defend for a SRU. or, rather, quite deep into the code. ** Description changed: [Impact]  * Users of man-db/2.9.1-1 in focal are sometimes facing unresponsiveness when man-db is