Happy to change this to be an SRU rather than a backport, I'll get
started on that.
** Summary changed:
- [BPO] qt6-base/6.2.4+dfsg-10 from kinetic
+ [SRU] qt6-base/6.2.4+dfsg-10 to jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed
This sounds like something that should be an SRU not a backport.
Especially since theres an open bug on this and a patch exists.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995967
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* The current version of qtbase6 in Ubuntu Jammy is not working
correctly due to bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qt6-base/+bug/1970057. This
issue has been resolved in Kinetic.
[Scope]
* Backport FROM Ubuntu 22.10 (Kinetic)
** Description changed:
[Impact]
- * The current version of qtbase6 in Ubuntu Jammy is not working
+ * The current version of qtbase6 in Ubuntu Jammy is not working
correctly due to bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qt6-base/+bug/1970057. This
issue has been resolved in
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
* The current version of qtbase6 in Ubuntu Jammy is not working
correctly due to bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qt6-base/+bug/1970057. This
issue has been resolved in Kinetic.
[Scope]
* Backport FROM Ubuntu 22.10 (Kinetic) package
You have been subscribed to a public bug by Dan Bryant (justdan96):
[Impact]
* The current version of qtbase6 in Ubuntu Jammy is not working
correctly due to bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qt6-base/+bug/1970057. This
issue has been resolved in Kinetic.
[Scope]
* Backport FROM
