[Bug 2012724] Re: [BPO] borgmatic 1.7.9-0ubuntu1 to jammy

2023-03-29 Thread Unit 193
Thanks. No I don't want kinetic, that just came through with the defaults. I didn't stage it or anything. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012724 Title: [BPO]

[Bug 2009944] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.4.6 for bionic, focal and jammy

2023-03-29 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Yes, it seems that René didn't follow the latest rules about epochs, and used it to revent accidental uploads (multiple!) of 7.5 to unstable instead of experimental. The current policy states that in those cases he should have used the +really notation, but I reckon he wouldn't have liked to

[Bug 2012724] Re: [BPO] borgmatic 1.7.9-0ubuntu1 to jammy

2023-03-29 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
approved the jammy bpo. I'm rejecting kinetic since that's out of policy (non-LTS target). Please tell us if you have some special needs for kinetic. ** Changed in: borgmatic (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: borgmatic (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Fix Released **

[Bug 2012945] Re: [BPO] studio-controls/2.3.9-0ubuntu2 from lunar

2023-03-29 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
good for me. ** Changed in: studio-controls (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012945 Title: [BPO]