[Bug 2030675] Re: [BPO] plastimatch/1.9.4+dfsg.1-2 for jammy (22.04LTS)

2023-08-07 Thread Thomas Ward
As a backporter *and* a Developer, I have some major concerns about this request. (1) This has no developer backing. One of the major things about a Backport is it needs a developer or sponsor willing to push this through. I don't see any tied to this request. (2) This request does **not** have

[Bug 2030675] Re: [BPO] plastimatch/1.9.4+dfsg.1-2 for jammy (22.04LTS)

2023-08-07 Thread Thomas Ward
@GregSharp It's invalid against the Development release, Mantic. We added the series target for Jammy which is what you requested the target OS to be. "Invalid" for a bare package bug is against the devel release, not for the entire request, because we track that by series tasks/targets. -- You

[Bug 2030675] Re: [BPO] plastimatch/1.9.4+dfsg.1-2 for jammy (22.04LTS)

2023-08-07 Thread Greg Sharp
Why is this invalid? Since Google colab updated to 22.04, users have found they can no longer install plastimatch on that platform. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2030675

[Bug 2030675] Re: [BPO] plastimatch/1.9.4+dfsg.1-2 for jammy (22.04LTS)

2023-08-07 Thread Thomas Ward
** Also affects: plastimatch (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: plastimatch (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.laun

[Bug 2030675] [NEW] [BPO] plastimatch/1.9.4+dfsg.1-2 for jammy (22.04LTS)

2023-08-07 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
You have been subscribed to a public bug by Greg Sharp (gregsharp-geo): [Impact] * This package never got released on jammy (22.04LTS) [Scope] * Backport from mantic. Version 1.9.4+dfsg.1-2. * Backport to jammy. [Other Info] * It's possible the source package is too new, and would need