[Bug 2056201] Re: [BPO] rpki-client/9.0-1 from noble

2024-03-05 Thread Paride Legovini
Some comments: - [1] says that "any changes required should be explicitly stated in the changelog entry of the backported package". Looks like there are some changes not listed in the changelog. - Is the sysusers thing a clean revert of 82ce99cec05b4016e019d6a3623e947587a3968e from the Vcs-Git

[Bug 2056201] Re: [BPO] rpki-client/9.0-1 from noble

2024-03-05 Thread Tobias Heider
test build is available at https://launchpad.net/~tobhe/+archive/ubuntu/testing/+packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056201 Title: [BPO] rpki-client/9.0-1 from

[Bug 2056201] Re: [BPO] rpki-client/9.0-1 from noble

2024-03-05 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
The attachment "rpki-jammy.diff" seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu- sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if

[Bug 2056201] Re: [BPO] rpki-client/9.0-1 from noble

2024-03-05 Thread Tobias Heider
** Patch removed: "rpki-jammy.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpki-client/+bug/2056201/+attachment/5752928/+files/rpki-jammy.diff ** Patch added: "rpki-jammy.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpki-client/+bug/2056201/+attachment/5752932/+files/rpki-jammy.diff

[Bug 2056201] Re: [BPO] rpki-client/9.0-1 from noble

2024-03-05 Thread Tobias Heider
jammy backport patch is attached or available via git at https://code.launchpad.net/~tobhe/ubuntu/+source/rpki-client/+git/rpki- client/+ref/ubuntu/jammy-backport ** Patch added: "rpki-jammy.diff"

[Bug 2056201] [NEW] [BPO] rpki-client/9.0-1 from noble

2024-03-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
You have been subscribed to a public bug by Tobias Heider (tobhe): [Impact] rpki-client implements the RPKI standard which is still actively developed and moving fast. Running a two year old release at this stage doesn't make a whole lot of sense so it would be great if we could make a version