[Bug 1416375] Re: openafs-modules-dkms fails to build with latest Precise kernel

Oh I see what you mean. It has nothing to do with the present patch—rebuilding the current source package with no changes results in a non-working source package. $ dget -d https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/openafs_1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.4.dsc $ dpkg-source -x openafs_1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.

[Bug 1416375] Re: openafs-modules-dkms fails to build with latest Precise kernel

In Luis’s debdiff, the modifications to debian/patches/debian-changes are just line number changes in the diff headers. The effect of the patch is not being modified. All the actual modifications are in debian/patches/Linux-d_alias-becomes-d_u.d_alias.patch. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1416375] Re: openafs-modules-dkms fails to build with latest Precise kernel

Also affects openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.7-1~ubuntu12.04.2 in precise- backports. ** Also affects: precise-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to Precise Backports. https://bu

[Bug 1206387] Re: openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module FTBFS on 3.8.0

Thanks, Felix. ** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387 Title: openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubun

[Bug 1206387] Re: openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module FTBFS on 3.8.0

Since I don’t have the ability to unmark this as fixed in Precise (which it is not), as opposed to Precise Backports (which it is), I’m reopening it in Ubuntu. Users are still running into this problem because most users do not have backports enabled. For example, bug 1325352 was just filed today.

[Bug 1206387] Re: openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module FTBFS on 3.8.0

This is fixed in precise-backports, not precise. Can you please unmark this as fixed in precise, if nothing else so that affected users can find this report? ** Also affects: precise-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: precise-backports Status: New => Fix R

[Bug 1206387] Re: openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module FTBFS on 3.8.0

(Er, I meant ~ubuntu10.04.1, of course.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387 Title: openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module FTBFS on 3.8.0 To manage notifica

[Bug 1206387] Re: openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module FTBFS on 3.8.0

The version number is too high. Packages in -backports need to have a smaller version number than the releases they were backported from; otherwise release upgrades will not work as expected. Usually this is accomplished with a decreasing ‘~’, as in 1.6.7-1~precise1 or 1.6.7-1~ubuntu8.04.1. -- Yo

[Bug 852603] Re: hedgewars << 0.9.17 can not engage in network play with current release

The right implementation of showB is showB :: (Show a) => a -> B.ByteString showB = B.pack . show (‘read’ is wrong, that would expect a quoted string). For mtl < 2, you should be able to replace ‘state’ with ‘State’. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Ba

[Bug 382048] Re: Backport subversion 1.6.5dfsg-1ubuntu1

Valentin: See the debdiffs I already posted in comment #17. ** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: Incomplete => New -- Backport subversion 1.6.5dfsg-1ubuntu1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382048 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Tea

Re: [Bug 382048] Re: Backport subversion 1.6.5dfsg-1ubuntu1

Here’s an update for subversion 1.6.5dfsg-1ubuntu1, which entered Karmic a few days ago. https://launchpad.net/~anders-kaseorg/+archive/subversion-1.6 summary "Backport subversion 1.6.5dfsg-1ubuntu1" ** Attachment added: "subversion_1.6.5dfsg-1ubuntu1~hardy1.de

[Bug 382048] Re: Backport subversion 1.6.1dfsg-1ubuntu2

** Attachment removed: "subversion_1.6.1dfsg-1ubuntu2~hardy1.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27755904/subversion_1.6.1dfsg-1ubuntu2%7Ehardy1.debdiff ** Attachment removed: "subversion_1.6.1dfsg-1ubuntu2~intrepid1.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27755903/subversion_1.6.1dfsg-1

Re: [Bug 382048] Re: Backport Subversion 1.6.x to hardy

This minor update fixes some Suggests: db4.7-util that should be db4.6-util, and adds LP closers. ** Attachment added: "subversion_1.6.1dfsg-1ubuntu2~hardy1.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28849495/subversion_1.6.1dfsg-1ubuntu2%7Ehardy1.debdiff ** Attachment added: "subversion_1.6.1df

[Bug 382048] Re: Backport subversion 1.6.1dfsg-1ubuntu2

> Am I correct in noting that 1.6 adds three new build dependencies? That’s right: libsqlite3-dev (>= 3.4), libgnome-keyring-dev, libdbus-1-dev. -- Backport subversion 1.6.1dfsg-1ubuntu2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382048 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 382048] Re: Backport subversion 1.6.1dfsg-1ubuntu2

Yeah, the Debian maintainer has mentioned that problem . A workaround is to disable gnome- keyring support in the [auth] section of ~/.subversion/config: ### Set password stores used by Subversion. They should be ### delimited by spaces or commas. The order of va

Re: [Bug 382048] Re: Backport Subversion 1.6.x to hardy

subversion 1.6.1dfsg-1ubuntu2 is in karmic now. Here are debdiffs for hardy-backports, intrepid-backports, and jaunty-backports. These packages are all building in my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~anders-kaseorg/+archive/subversion-1.6 Please help test them and report here. summary "Bac

[Bug 380849] Re: Please backport subversion 1.6

I have been working on Subversion 1.6 packages for Ubuntu (see bug 380849). Can you test my Jaunty package here? https://launchpad.net/~anders-kaseorg/+archive/subversion-1.6 -- Please backport subversion 1.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380849 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 348865] Re: [hardy-backports] Rebuild msmtp against new libgsasl7-dev (was: [hardy] libgsasl7-dev missing dependencies on libntlm0-dev, libkrb5-dev)

** Summary changed: - [hardy] libgsasl7-dev missing dependencies on libntlm0-dev, libkrb5-dev + [hardy-backports] Rebuild msmtp against new libgsasl7-dev (was: [hardy] libgsasl7-dev missing dependencies on libntlm0-dev, libkrb5-dev) -- [hardy-backports] Rebuild msmtp against new libgsasl7-dev (

[Bug 348865] Re: [hardy] libgsasl7-dev missing dependencies on libntlm0-dev, libkrb5-dev

It is a no-change rebuild. Here’s my debdiff anyway, in case that’s useful. ** Attachment added: "debdiff for hardy-backports msmtp" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24703456/msmtp_1.4.6-1%7Ehardy2_lp348865.debdiff -- [hardy] libgsasl7-dev missing dependencies on libntlm0-dev, libkrb5-dev http

[Bug 348865] Re: [hardy] libgsasl7-dev missing dependencies on libntlm0-dev, libkrb5-dev

I rebuilt the hardy-backports msmtp in my PPA against the hardy-proposed gsasl: https://launchpad.net/~anders-kaseorg/+archive/ppa http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24640768/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-i386.msmtp_1.4.16-1~hardy2~andersk3_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz and verified that I can successfully send

[Bug 348865] Re: [hardy] libgsasl7-dev missing dependencies on libntlm0-dev, libkrb5-dev

And the current msmtp in hardy release was built against libgsasl7-dev 0.2.12-1build1, which was before ntlm support was added, so it also successfully configured with gsasl. The msmtp in hardy-backports seems to be the only affected package. ** Changed in: msmtp (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New

[Bug 348865] Re: [hardy] libgsasl7-dev missing dependencies on libntlm0-dev, libkrb5-dev

All the packages other than msmtp successfully configured with gsasl in spite of this bug, because they don’t use AC_LIB_HAVE_LINKFLAGS to find dependencies of -lgsasl. ** Changed in: anubis (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: anubis (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid

[Bug 348865] Re: [hardy] libgsasl7-dev missing dependencies on libntlm0-dev, libkrb5-dev

I have built and tested the fixed gsasl in my PPA. I also built the hardy-backports msmtp against it with no source changes, and successfully tested it with --auth=gssapi. https://launchpad.net/~anders-kaseorg/+archive/ppa -- [hardy] libgsasl7-dev missing dependencies on libntlm0-dev, libkrb5

[Bug 313598] Re: Please backport msmtp 1.4.16-1 from Jaunty to Hardy/Intrepid

This upload caused a regression in Hardy: gsasl support is now missing. This is actually due to a missing dependency in the libgsasl7-dev package, as described in bug 348865. Intrepid is not affected. -- Please backport msmtp 1.4.16-1 from Jaunty to Hardy/Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 348865] Re: [hardy] libgsasl7-dev missing dependencies on libntlm0-dev, libkrb5-dev

** Attachment added: "debdiff for Hardy" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24358674/gsasl_0.2.21-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff ** Also affects: hardy-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #444311 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=44431

[Bug 32218] drscheme: merge new debian version

Public bug reported: DrScheme 301 was released and has been available in Debian for some time, but Ubuntu still has 209. ** Affects: drscheme (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Assignee: Ubuntu Backporters Status: Unconfirmed -- drscheme: merge new debian version https://launchpad.net/