[Bug 933641] Re: Enable broadway (HTML5) backend

2013-01-09 Thread Benjamin Drung
ricotz bdrung, the stipped gdk lib would grow by ca. 90kb -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to Precise Backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933641 Title: Enable broadway (HTML5) backend To manage notifications

[Bug 1007908] Re: [backportpackage] doesn't work if package isn't already in Ubuntu

2012-06-16 Thread Benjamin Drung
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007908 Title: [backportpackage] doesn't work if package

[Bug 1007042] Re: [backportpackage] errors out on packages with no ubuntu revision

2012-06-16 Thread Benjamin Drung
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007042 Title: [backportpackage] errors out on packages with

[Bug 1007042] Re: [backportpackage] fails but worked last week

2012-06-01 Thread Benjamin Drung
Wouldn't it be better to tweak dpkg-source to look for ubuntu, but not for ~ubuntu? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007042 Title: [backportpackage] fails but worked

[Bug 800224] Re: Please backport packaging-dev 0.1.1

2011-07-10 Thread Benjamin Drung
I downgraded the debhelper dependency to the lowest needed one (7.0.50~ for dh_override_* targets) and uploaded it as version 0.1.1. Please backport that. ** Summary changed: - Please backport packaging-dev 0.1 + Please backport packaging-dev 0.1.1 ** Description changed: - Please backport

[Bug 802044] Re: Please backport nspluginwrapper 1.4.2-0ubuntu2

2011-07-09 Thread Benjamin Drung
I can confirm that it works with flashplugin-installer from natty- security. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802044 Title: Please backport nspluginwrapper

[Bug 802044] [NEW] Please backport nspluginwrapper 1.4.2-0ubuntu2

2011-06-25 Thread Benjamin Drung
Public bug reported: Please backport nspluginwrapper 1.4.2-0ubuntu2 to natty. It compiles [1], installs, and runs. [1] https://launchpad.net/~bdrung/+archive/backports ** Affects: natty-backports Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: natty-backports

[Bug 800227] [NEW] Please backport packaging-dev 0.1

2011-06-21 Thread Benjamin Drung
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 800224 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800224 Public bug reported: Please backport packaging-dev 0.1 to maverick. It builds without modification. ** Affects: maverick-backports Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Changed in:

[Bug 800224] [NEW] Please backport packaging-dev 0.1

2011-06-21 Thread Benjamin Drung
Public bug reported: Please backport packaging-dev 0.1 to natty, maverick, and lucid. It builds without modification on natty and maverick and installs. ** Affects: lucid-backports Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Affects: maverick-backports Importance: Undecided

[Bug 800224] Re: Please backport packaging-dev 0.1

2011-06-21 Thread Benjamin Drung
Here's the debdiff for lucid. ** Patch added: lucid.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/800224/+attachment/2177080/+files/lucid.patch ** Changed in: lucid-backports Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 793709] Re: Please backport indicator-multiload 0.1-0ubuntu1

2011-06-06 Thread Benjamin Drung
Marking as confirmed as recommended in bug #786483. ** Changed in: natty-backports Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/793709 Title:

[Bug 793709] [NEW] Please backport indicator-multiload 0.1-0ubuntu1

2011-06-06 Thread Benjamin Drung
Public bug reported: Please backport indicator-multiload 0.1-0ubuntu1 to natty. It builds without modification [1], installs and works. [1] https://launchpad.net/~bdrung/+archive/backports ** Affects: natty-backports Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- You received this

[Bug 787383] Re: Include bitesize script in ubuntu-dev-tools

2011-05-27 Thread Benjamin Drung
Some scripts were moved from ubuntu-dev-tools to devscripts. One option would be to backport devscripts 2.11.0 and ubuntu-dev-tools 0.124. The problem with the versioning is that there will be more SRUs (for e.g. distro-info). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 786483] [NEW] Please backport lintian 2.5.0ubuntu1

2011-05-22 Thread Benjamin Drung
Public bug reported: Please backport lintian 2.5.0ubuntu1 to natty. It builds without modification [1], installs and works. [1] https://launchpad.net/~bdrung/+archive/backports ** Affects: natty-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 778175] [NEW] Please backport lintian 2.5.0~rc3ubuntu1

2011-05-05 Thread Benjamin Drung
Public bug reported: Please backport lintian 2.5.0~rc3ubuntu1 to natty. It builds without modification [1] and works. [1] https://launchpad.net/~bdrung/+archive/backports ** Affects: natty-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: - Please backport

[Bug 607505] Re: [test-pkg-a] Please backport VLC 1.1.4-1ubuntu1

2010-10-19 Thread Benjamin Drung
As previous mentioned, source changes are required. You have to use the attached patch for backporting the package to lucid. ** Patch added: vlc_1.1.4-1ubuntu1~lucid1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/607505/+attachment/1702156/+files/vlc_1.1.4-1ubuntu1%7Elucid1.debdiff

[Bug 607505] Re: [test-pkg-a] Please backport VLC 1.1.4-1ubuntu1

2010-09-27 Thread Benjamin Drung
** Summary changed: - [test-pkg-a] Please backport VLC 1.1.3 + [test-pkg-a] Please backport VLC 1.1.4-1ubuntu1 -- [test-pkg-a] Please backport VLC 1.1.4-1ubuntu1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607505 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is

[Bug 607505] Re: [test-pkg-a] Please backport VLC 1.1.3

2010-09-22 Thread Benjamin Drung
I am against the backport of ffmpeg v0.6. It will break the version of audacity in lucid. The backport of FFmpeg can cause too many issues. Instead vlc should be adjusted to build with the FFmpeg version of lucid. Attached a patch that will work on lucid. There is only one issue to resolve: Check

[Bug 530972] Re: [SRU] usbmount in karmic

2010-04-03 Thread Benjamin Drung
uploaded ** Changed in: usbmount (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: New = Fix Committed -- [SRU] usbmount in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530972 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-backports mailing

[Bug 307239] Re: Please backport vlc to 0.9.8a in Intrepid (important security update)

2010-04-03 Thread Benjamin Drung
** Changed in: vlc (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- Please backport vlc to 0.9.8a in Intrepid (important security update) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307239 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy

[Bug 530945] Re: [SRU] keepalived in karmic

2010-04-03 Thread Benjamin Drung
uploaded ** Changed in: keepalived (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed -- [SRU] keepalived in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-backports

[Bug 530972] Re: [SRU] usbmount in karmic

2010-03-27 Thread Benjamin Drung
Unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors; you can upload the patch by yourself. -- [SRU] usbmount in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530972 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list

[Bug 504512] [NEW] Please backport lintian 2.3.1ubuntu1

2010-01-07 Thread Benjamin Drung
Public bug reported: Please backport lintian 2.3.1ubuntu1 It builds on karmic without changes. I used it heavily without problems. I have uploaded an unchanged version to my backports PPA: https://launchpad.net/~bdrung/+archive/backports ** Affects: karmic-backports Importance: Undecided

[Bug 54287] Re: version too old

2010-01-01 Thread Benjamin Drung
** Changed in: libcm (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu Sponsors for universe (ubuntu-universe-sponsors) = (unassigned) -- version too old https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54287 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is a direct subscriber. --

[Bug 320762] Re: Please backport adblock-plus 1.1-0ubuntu1

2009-07-25 Thread Benjamin Drung
** Summary changed: - Backport adblock-plus 1.0.1-0ubuntu1 to intrepid + Please backport adblock-plus 1.1-0ubuntu1 ** Description changed: Recommended filter subscription for adblock-plus requires adblock-plus - 1.0.1 to function properly, as seen in screenshot attached. I think it's - a good

[Bug 301429] Re: Please backport audacity 1.3.6-2 from Jaunty

2009-01-21 Thread Benjamin Drung
You do not need to backport automake1.10. You only have to add automake to build dependencies. Have a look at my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~bdrung/+archive -- Please backport audacity 1.3.6-2 from Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301429 You received this bug notification because you are a