[Bug 1000492] Re: Please backport boinc 7.0.27+dfsg-3 (universe) from quantal

2012-07-11 Thread Daniel Hahler
Please see bug 1009536 - we are working to get a SRU for boinc into Ubuntu Precise. Given that, a backport would not be necessary. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Precise Backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 315506] Re: Please backport puppet 2.6.2 or newer to hardy (LTS)

2010-11-09 Thread Daniel Hahler
** Summary changed: - Please backport puppet 0.24.5 or newer to hardy (LTS) + Please backport puppet 2.6.2 or newer to hardy (LTS) -- Please backport puppet 2.6.2 or newer to hardy (LTS) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315506 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 382997] Re: Please backport debhelper-7.2.14ubuntu1 from Karmic

2010-09-23 Thread Daniel Hahler
According to https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports#Backport%20Process the bug status appears to be wrong. @Rolf: again, are you working on this? Have you marked it as "In Progress" intentionally or by accident? -- Please backport debhelper-7.2.14ubuntu1 from Karmic https://bugs.launc

[Bug 590801] Re: Please backport boinc

2010-08-04 Thread Daniel Hahler
JFI: packages for the current BOINC release are available via the packager's PPA: https://launchpad.net/~pkg-boinc/+archive/ppa -- Please backport boinc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590801 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registra

[Bug 537560] Re: Please backport java-common

2010-03-11 Thread Daniel Hahler
** Description changed: default-jdk is a meta package, which is required by e.g. munin. + + It built fine in a Hardy sbuilder and it should show up in my PPA in a + minute (https://launchpad.net/~blueyed/+archive/ppa/+packages) -- Please backport java-common https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/53

[Bug 537560] Re: Please backport java-common

2010-03-11 Thread Daniel Hahler
** Summary changed: - Please backport default-jdk + Please backport java-common -- Please backport java-common https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-

[Bug 537560] [NEW] Please backport java-common

2010-03-11 Thread Daniel Hahler
Public bug reported: default-jdk is a meta package, which is required by e.g. munin. ** Affects: hardy-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please backport java-common https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Bug 382997] Re: Please backport debhelper-7.2.14ubuntu1 from Karmic

2010-02-20 Thread Daniel Hahler
Rolf, are you still working on this? Not having debhelper 7 via backports makes backporting packages (e.g. stunnel4) from Lucid to Hardy more difficult. -- Please backport debhelper-7.2.14ubuntu1 from Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382997 You received this bug notification because you ar

[Bug 502071] Re: FH_DATE_PAST_20XX scores on all mails dated 2010 or later

2010-01-03 Thread Daniel Hahler
Probably I'm wrong, but shouldn't sa-update take care of this? (at least it did for me: have not installed any updates, but runnin sa-update manually fixed it). As far as I know, if I had not run it manually, a daily cron job (cron.daily/spamassassin) would have taken care of it. -- FH_DATE_PAS

[Bug 277690] Re: please backport boinc

2009-01-03 Thread Daniel Hahler
Setting status to "In Progress", as seen in the activity log of the bug. ** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- please backport boinc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277690 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing

[Bug 277690] Re: please backport boinc

2009-01-02 Thread Daniel Hahler
Re-opening, since it has not been built for i386 due to "chroot problem", see https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/6.2.14-2~hardy1. Please fix this. ** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- please backport boinc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277690 You

[Bug 235424] Re: Update package from upstream to version 2.46

2008-05-28 Thread Daniel Hahler
That sounds like a lot of new, great stuff. It's in Debian experimental already and should get provided through Intrepid and hardy-backports. ** Changed in: blender (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Tags added: upgrade ** Tags removed: update ** Also affects: hardy-backports I

[Bug 122959] Re: Please backport Ant 1.7.0 for feisty

2007-06-29 Thread dAniel hAhler
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 122960 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122960 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 122960 Please backport Ant 1.7.0 for feisty -- Please backport Ant 1.7.0 for feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122959 You received this bug notification

[Bug 59802] Re: Inconsistent config files

2007-05-01 Thread dAniel hAhler
This appears to only be a problem with the dapper-backport. At least I only have /etc/checkinstallrc in Ubuntu Feisty. However, the dapper-backports checkinstall package (see http://packages.ubuntu.com/dapper-backports/admin/checkinstall) does not contain /etc/checkinstall. So probably this is