Having looked at the versions of debhelper in play, and the versions
that introduced / fixed various bugs, my current reading of the
situation is as follows:
All current bionic and focal versions in release, updates, and backports
(11.1.6, 12.10, and 13.5.2) will be producing packages where the ol
x27;t be hugely
invasive.
** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dave Jones (waveform)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758
Title:
[BPO
Public bug reported:
Please backport trac 1.0.1-2 (universe) from trusty to precise.
Reason for the backport:
Some useful trac plugins no longer work with the version of trac that is
currently bundled with precise.
Testing:
Mark off items in the checklist [X] a
...SRU of 7.0.27 from debian unstable to precise?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Precise Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000492
Title:
Please backport boinc 7.0.27+dfsg-3 (universe) from quantal
To
Your test build Micah was a 7.0.24. I remember someone saying we didn't
want a version here that wasn't in debian, correct? Debian has no 7.0.24
version... Not anymore anyways.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Precis
ubuntu-online-tour (0.11-0ubuntu1~ubuntu12.04.1) precise-backports;
urgency=low
* No-change backport to precise.
-- Dave Walker (Daviey)Wed, 23 May 2012
08:58:11 +0100
** Changed in: precise-backports
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notificat
Public bug reported:
Please backport ubuntu-online-tour 0.11-0ubuntu1 (universe) from quantal
to precise.
Reason for the backport:
To make this package available to the LTS users.
Testing:
You can test-build the backport in your PPA with backportpackage:
$ back
I apologize, I'm kinda new here at launchpad. Can you elaborate on what
you mean about "add a test case"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Precise Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000492
Title:
Please ba
was this build(7.0.24+dfsg-1ubuntu0.1~ubuntu12.04.1~ppa1) with your
patch??
I tested it in precise 64... Still running it actually. Some verified
work units as well. :-)
(side note, I do not crunch data with a GPU and therefore cannot
guarantee anything on that end, all I can say is there is no c
Micah, just for a verification, your7.0.24+dfsg-
1ubuntu0.1~ubuntu12.04.1~ppa1 does not seem to have the "computation
error bug" found here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/991179
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which
@dino99, are you still having trouble with this?
Thanks,
Dave M
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Karmic Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366572
Title:
Clam TK can't find virus definitions
To m
** Also affects: gtk-vnc (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to a duplicate bug report (779533).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598597
Title:
Vinagre closes connect
Looks like BOTH open-ssh packages are needed. Need openssh-server to
allow the sshd_config option TrustedUserCAKeys
This sshd_config option is available in openssh-
server_5.3p1-3ubuntu3_i386 and _amd64
** Description changed:
We are using 10.4LTS in production and part of our new security is
Public bug reported:
We are using 10.4LTS in production and part of our new security is to
sign the ssh keys with a certificate, It's available as an option in
openssh-client_5.8p1-1ubuntu3_i386 but not in openssh-
client_5.3p1-3ubuntu3_i386.
Specifically it's the ssh-keygen -s option.
** Affect
Public bug reported:
...so that we can get the AudioScrobbler plug-in back. It was taken out
of 2.3, but replaced in 2.4. Thanks.
** Affects: lucid-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, w
@dino99, I cannot duplicate this. I can update signatures individually
or using the signatures downloaded by freshclam. Also, the package which
does updating (freshclam) is part of 'clamav-freshclam', not 'clamav-
daemon'. Can you see if that is installed? If not, where did you get
the clamtk pac
Keith, can you verify the version you are running? 4.23?
Also, please try running "clamtk" (sans quotes) from the commandline to
see if any error messages are being thrown out there.
Thanks,
--
Clam TK can't find virus definitions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366572
You received this bug not
Is there an update on the status of this bug?
--
[needs-packaging] libapache2-mod-limitipconn
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145065
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing
You can get the latest versions at get deb.com It has versions for 8.10
up. It may not update for you. You may have to go back to get deb for
that. They are working on a repository but don't think its fully
functional yet.
--
Yahoo server authentication changed: Pidgin =<2.5.6 will not connect
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 250397 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250397
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 250397
[needs-packaging] CampCaster - radio station suite & audio streamer
--
The Campcaster Deb pacage wil not be installd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3
** Changed in: kdenetwork (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Dave Walker (davewalker) => (unassigned)
--
Kopete package is missing .desktop file for meanwhile protocol
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333041
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is
Hi,
Thanks for that build - although it was i386 and I'm x86-64 it did reassure
me it would build; so I built 5.0.1 from the gutsy sources and it does seem to
fix the black printing problem the feisty version has.
Dave
--
Please backport Gutenprint 5.1.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net
I'd also like the Gutsy gutenprint since it supposedly fixes a problem
related to the ubuntu bug #79261; in that the version in feisty misses
black on some epson printers (c86 in my case); now the Gutsy one is only
5.0.1 but apparently has a fix for this particular problem in ; it's a
bit of a show
I don't care about Dapper, only Edgy. Can 2.2.3 be backported to Edgy?
On 2/20/07, Lionel Porcheron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As for Dapper, we need to backport about 40 Apache2 modules which seems
> unfeasible.
>
>
> ** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
>Status: Unconfirmed => R
Public bug reported:
Please backport Apache 2.2.3 to Edgy. Apparently there is something in
Edgy that breaks my app. It worked before I upgraded to Edgy. Rather
than lingering in the past, I'm ready to move on to Apache 2.2 please.
** Affects: edgy-backports (upstream)
Importance: Undecid
Public bug reported:
I was able to successfully build (and run) the latest gaim
(1:2.0.0+beta5-6ubuntu1) from feisty for edgy using prevu.
It should be backported to edgy because edgy is running an earlier beta.
** Affects: edgy-backports (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Un
depends bug report is bug #63528
--
package should depend on php5-imap | php4-imap
https://launchpad.net/bugs/61783
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Sorry for being slow to respond, I just double checked the dependencies
and don't know how I missed it first time around.
btw the 0.9.16.011 package has a nasty bug in it, I will file a new
report on it.
--
package should depend on php5-imap | php4-imap
https://launchpad.net/bugs/61783
--
ubun
I am currently running a 2.6.16 self compiled kernel which fixes
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/linux-
source-2.6.15/+bug/42578 but has caused other problems - such as no
cdrom :(
I have given up hope seeing that bug get fixed in a backport. I would
like to see an official 2.6.17 ba
29 matches
Mail list logo
