[Bug 834361] Re: Please backport tahoe-lafs (1.8.3-0ubuntu1) from oneiric

2011-12-06 Thread David-Sarah Hopwood
I reviewed all upstream changes in simplejson between 2.0.9 (the version in Lucid) and 2.1.1 for potentially breaking changes: - there was a new feature, object_pairs_hook, that added a fair amount of code. This caused a regression that was caught before release: http://code.google.com/p/simplej

[Bug 834361] Re: Please backport tahoe-lafs (1.8.3-0ubuntu1) from oneiric

2011-11-29 Thread David-Sarah Hopwood
Maverick has the following missing dependencies: tahoe-lafs : Depends: python-foolscap (>= 0.6.1-3) but 0.5.1+dfsg-0ubuntu1 is to be installed Depends: python-pycryptopp (>= 0.5.29-1) but 0.5.17-1 is to be installed It does have python-simplejson, version 2.1.1-1. -- You receiv

[Bug 834361] Re: Please backport tahoe-lafs (1.8.3-0ubuntu1) from oneiric

2011-11-29 Thread David-Sarah Hopwood
"> pycryptopp >= 0.5.20 Again, there seems to be a disagreement in the packaging. The package depends on python-pycryptopp (>= 0.5.29) - any thoughts on why the dependency is higher?" As far as I know, the tahoe-lafs package need not depend on 0.5.29, that just happened to be the version of pycry

[Bug 834361] Re: Please backport tahoe-lafs (1.8.3-0ubuntu1) from oneiric

2011-11-29 Thread David-Sarah Hopwood
This changeset released in simplejson 2.1: http://code.google.com/p/simplejson/source/diff?spec=svn212&r=212&format=side&path=/trunk/simplejson/_speedups.c , looks security-relevant. (I have to say that the simplejson maintainers don't seem to be very good at providing meaningful stand-alone commi

[Bug 834354] Re: Please backport tahoe-lafs

2011-11-27 Thread David-Sarah Hopwood
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 834361 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/834361 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 834361 Please backport tahoe-lafs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backp

[Bug 834361] Re: Please backport tahoe-lafs

2011-11-27 Thread David-Sarah Hopwood
I can test this for Maverick. There was a separate bug ticket for Maverick (bug 834354) which I will mark as a duplicate. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/834361 Titl

[Bug 834361] [NEW] Please backport tahoe-lafs

2011-08-25 Thread David-Sarah Hopwood
Public bug reported: Please backport 1.8.2-3fakesync1 from Oneiric. See http://tahoe- lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/browser/trunk/NEWS.rst?rev=5046 for the upstream changelog between versions 1.6.1 and 1.8.2. Several packaging bugs have also been fixed since then. ** Affects: lucid-backports Impo

[Bug 834354] [NEW] Please backport tahoe-lafs

2011-08-25 Thread David-Sarah Hopwood
Public bug reported: The tahoe-lafs package in Maverick is missing the python-mock dependency (bug 769935). Backporting 1.8.2-3fakesync1 from Oneiric (see bug 815397) would fix this for users who have the backports repository enabled. See http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/browser/trunk/NEWS.rs