** Description changed:
A recent change to sks packaging uses the dpkg-vendor command to
determine if the current OS derives from Ubuntu. dpkg-vendor is
provided by the dpkg-dev package, which sks does not, and should not
depend on.
In order for the postinst to behave properly, it
nentis-
Thanks for retesting.
I'm employed by Canonical to do this sort of work, and therefore won't
accept your bounty ;-)
Though I appreciate the gesture.
:-Dustin
--
kvm-84: virtio on qcow2 broken (regression)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404394
You received this bug notification
I, too, tested raw images as well, and saw no problems.
--
kvm-84: virtio on qcow2 broken (regression)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports.
--
: Undecided = High
** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu Karmic)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Dustin Kirkland (kirkland
Uploaded to:
* jaunty-proposed
* intrepid-backports
* hardy-backports
Awaiting archive approval. Please test this ASAP.
** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu Hardy)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
--
qcow2 corruption regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404394
You
** Summary changed:
- qcow2 corruption regression
+ kvm-84: virtio on qcow2 broken (regression)
--
kvm-84: virtio on qcow2 broken (regression)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is a direct subscriber.
** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
--
kvm-84: virtio on qcow2 broken (regression)
Subscribing ubuntu-archive-admin.
Michael ack'd this package a month or so ago. Can we get it into
intrepid-backports now, and hardy-backports very soon?
:-Dustin
--
backport libvirt to hardy and intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404060
You received this bug notification because you
Marking the intrepid task 'fix released', as kvm-84 has been rolled out
to intrepid-backports.
Now that that package has had some time to bake, and no issues have been
raised, I have uploaded to hardy-backports as well.
It should be in the queue, awaiting some archive-admin love...
:-Dustin
**
Bump? Any progress, backports team?
:-Dustin
--
backport kvm-84 to hardy and intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396721
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
Sponsored to intrepid-backports.
Ensuring that that works before uploading to hardy-backports.
:-Dustin
--
backport kvm-84 to hardy and intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396721
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is
Jaunty's kvm-84 packages have been promoted from -proposed to -updates.
I think we're ready to proceed with the backport to hardy and intrepid.
:-Dustin
--
backport kvm-84 to hardy and intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396721
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Hardy debdiff attached.
:-Dustin
** Attachment added: hardy-kvm-84-backport.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29481882/hardy-kvm-84-backport.debdiff
--
backport kvm-84 to hardy and intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396721
You received this bug notification because you are a
Intrepid debdiff attached.
:-Dustin
** Attachment added: intrepid-kvm-84-backport.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29481886/intrepid-kvm-84-backport.debdiff
--
backport kvm-84 to hardy and intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396721
You received this bug notification because you
Public bug reported:
I have spent several weeks developing, testing, and stabilizing a
backport of Jaunty's libvirt to both Hardy and Intrepid.
This backport should be handled in conjunction with the backport of
Jaunty's kvm-84 to hardy. While kvm-84 is not explicitly dependent on
this newer
Attaching debdiff for hardy.
:-Dustin
** Attachment added: hardy-libvirt-backport.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29482779/hardy-libvirt-backport.debdiff
--
backport libvirt to hardy and intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404060
You received this bug notification because you are
Attaching debdiff for intrepid.
:-Dustin
** Attachment added: intrepid-libvirt-backport.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29482805/intrepid-libvirt-backport.debdiff
--
backport libvirt to hardy and intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404060
You received this bug notification
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 404060 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404060
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 404060
backport libvirt to hardy and intrepid
--
Please backport Libvirt-bin 0.5.1 from Jaunty to Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321849
You received
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 404060 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404060
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 404060
backport libvirt to hardy and intrepid
--
Please backport libvirt-bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259821
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
I have spent several months developing, testing, and stabilizing a
backport of Jaunty's kvm-84 to both Hardy and Intrepid.
Hardy shipped with kvm-62, and Intrepid with kvm-72. While both of
these versions of kvm are suitable for some use cases, they both suffer
from some
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 396721 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396721
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 396721
backport kvm-84 to hardy and intrepid
--
please backport kvm
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252257
You received this bug notification because you
filezilla_3.2.2.1-1.dsc ... done.
I: Building backport of filezilla-3.2.2.1 as 3.2.2.1-1~intrepid1 ... done.
** Changed in: intrepid-backports
Assignee: (unassigned) = Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
--
Please backport filezilla 3.2.2.1-1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335692
You received this bug
Per Jonathan's last comment, I'm going to mark this 'Incomplete', until
you guys can confirm that both packages have been tested adequately on
Intrepid. After that, please mark 'Confirmed' again, and the ubuntu-
archive team will handle this request.
Thanks,
:-Dustin
** Changed in:
[Updating] texmaker (1.7.1-2.1 [Ubuntu] 1.8-1 [Debian])
* Trying to add texmaker...
- texmaker_1.8-1.dsc: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
- texmaker_1.8.orig.tar.gz: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
- texmaker_1.8-1.diff.gz: downloading from
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Tormod Volden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a debdiff with the 5 stripped down security patches:
Thanks Tormod.
I've reviewed this debdiff. It applies cleanly and php builds cleanly
for me.
Kees and Jamie generally review these sorts of security fixes, so I'm
For what it's worth, I also built php5 with and without Tormod's
debdiff.
I'm attaching a diff of the resulting test-results.txt (a regression
test suite built and run as part of php5's debuild).
No regressions reported by the test-results.txt diff.
:-Dustin
** Attachment added:
I just modified the bug description, and added the Hardy-Backports
project.
Packages are available in my PPA for testing.
:-Dustin
** Summary changed:
- PHP 5.2.6 fixes important security bugs
+ Please Backport PHP 5.2.6 -- fixes important security bugs
** Also affects: hardy-backports
27 matches
Mail list logo
