[Bug 306280] Re: Update libdmtx to 0.6.0

2008-12-08 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
** Also affects: libdmtx (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Update libdmtx to 0.6.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306280 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backpor

[Bug 223789] Re: [needs-packaging] mercurial 1.0

2008-06-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
mercurial | 1.0-7 | http://archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/universe Sources And 1.0.1-1 has just been synced: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mercurial/1.0.1-1 -- [needs-packaging] mercurial 1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223789 You received this bug notification because you are

Re: [Bug 175676] Re: backport tracker 0.6.6

2008-04-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Valentin Rocher wrote: > When I try to backport it, I have this error : > > pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy: Depends: libexempi-dev (>= 1.99.2) which > is a virtual package. > > Isn't it a bit hazardous to mark this bug as confirmed thus ? You need to backport exempi first (or alternatively remove

Re: [Bug 175676] Re: backport tracker 0.6.6

2008-04-07 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
sefs wrote: > I just realised these are hardy repos here > https://launchpad.net/~pochu/+archive > > anything for gusty 7.10? > There's Gutsy packages there... -- backport tracker 0.6.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 211756] [NEW] Please backport emesene 1.0-dist-1 from hardy

2008-04-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Public bug reported: Hi, Please, backport emesene from Hardy. There's many users using the upstream apt repo, so there's a user base out there which will benefit from this package, and it would be better for them if they were using the official backports. I haven't been able to test it outside H

[Bug 209463] Re: wesnoth in gutsy-backports does not have required dependency

2008-03-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
That's something up to the backports team. ** Changed in: wesnoth (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- wesnoth in gutsy-backports does not have required dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing

Re: [Bug 175676] Re: backport tracker 0.6.6

2008-03-15 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
I got good feedback from one user and it has worked fine for me. -- backport tracker 0.6.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing lis

[Bug 173924] Re: Please backport wesnoth 1.2.8-1 from Hardy. Fixes 3 CVEs

2007-12-09 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Thanks Jérôme for the testing! I've opened the Edgy request here, let's track all of them in the same bug. ** Also affects: edgy-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: feisty-backports Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: gutsy-backports Status: Ne

[Bug 173925] Re: Please backport wesnoth 1.2.8-1 from Hardy. Fixes 3 CVEs

2007-12-09 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 173924 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173924 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 173924 Please backport wesnoth 1.2.8-1 from Hardy. Fixes 3 CVEs -- Please backport wesnoth 1.2.8-1 from Hardy. Fixes 3 CVEs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1

[Bug 173924] Re: Please backport wesnoth 1.2.8-1 from Hardy. Fixes 3 CVEs

2007-12-09 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
No need to wait, as it won't be synced, since 1.3.x is unstable. I'd appreciate (well, not me, but backports users) a backport of 1.2.8. Thanks -- Please backport wesnoth 1.2.8-1 from Hardy. Fixes 3 CVEs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173924 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 173925] Please backport wesnoth 1.2.8-1 from Hardy. Fixes 3 CVEs

2007-12-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Public bug reported: Please backport wesnoth 1.2.8-1 from Hardy. edgy-backports has version 1.2.3, which is vulnerable to 3 CVEs. https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/cve/2007-3917 https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/cve/2007-5742 https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/cve/2007-6201 Thanks. **

[Bug 173924] Please backport wesnoth 1.2.8-1 from Hardy. Fixes 3 CVEs

2007-12-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Public bug reported: Please backport wesnoth 1.2.8-1 from Hardy. feisty-backports has version 1.2.5, which is vulnerable to 3 CVEs. https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/cve/2007-3917 https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/cve/2007-5742 https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/cve/2007-6201 Thanks. *

[Bug 148493] Re: Please backport newer sqlite3_3.4.2 (ok with prevu)

2007-10-09 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Just a couple of hints: The target should be dapper-backports, instead of dapper. In debian/changelog, the width shouldn't be bigger than 80 chars, but the line with your name is. The version number should be blah~dapper1 instead of -dapper1 (since blah-dapper1 > blah > blah~dapper1). Using ~dap

[Bug 148493] Re: Please backport newer sqlite3_3.4.2 (ok with prevu)

2007-10-08 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
It's quite easy. Check https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Recipes/Debdiff If you have any doubt, just ask. And if you can't do it, I'll have a look. Best, Emilio -- Please backport newer sqlite3_3.4.2 (ok with prevu) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148493 You received this bug notification because yo

[Bug 135171] Re: Please backport tracker 0.6.1-0ubuntu1 from Gutsy to Feisty

2007-09-09 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
It looks like the builder needs an apt-get update ;) It's trying to get an old version of libnspr4 (2.0.0.4) from feisty-security, and since there's a newer version (2.0.0.6) it gets a 404 error and the build fails. Could you please update it (if needed) and retry the build? Thanks, Emilio -- P

[Bug 135171] Please backport tracker 0.6.1-0ubuntu1 from Gutsy to Feisty

2007-08-27 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Public bug reported: This has been requested in Bug #85029, and backporting tracker will fix it in feisty. So please, consider it. ** Affects: feisty-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please backport tracker 0.6.1-0ubuntu1 from Gutsy to Feisty https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 118592] Re: tomcat 5.5 does not start due to catalina.out fifo

2007-06-19 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 97096 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97096 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 97096 Please backport tomcat5.5 from gutsy (was: tomcat5.5 won't start b/c of catalina.out named pipe) -- tomcat 5.5 does not start due to catalina.out fifo h