Ghadi,
This is inaccurate. I just upgraded to it on my noble system. Use `sudo
apt upgrade obs-studio/noble-backports` and you should be good.
$ apt-cache policy obs-studio obs-plugins libobs0t64
obs-studio:
Installed: 30.1.2+dfsg-1build1~bpo24.04.1
Candidate: 30.1.2+dfsg-1build1~bpo24.04.1
** Description changed:
[Impact]
obs-studio 30.1 was released but, as obs does with their point releases,
includes far too many features to justify a simple SRU bugfix
microrelease. Therefore, the most logical way to get a bugfix release
like this into users is to backport it. Besides
** Changed in: obs-studio (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072793
Title:
[BPO] obs-studio/30.1.2+dfsg-1build1 from or
: Undecided
Status: Invalid
** Affects: lsp-plugins (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Erich Eickmeyer (eeickmeyer)
Status: In Progress
** Also affects: lsp-plugins (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: lsp-plugins (Ubuntu
** Changed in: carla (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049779
Title:
[BPO] carla/2.5.8-0ubuntu1 from noble
To manage not
** Changed in: carla (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Erich Eickmeyer (eeickmeyer) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2022875
Title:
[BPO] carla/2.5.5-0ubuntu1 f
> Since that PPA also has many other backported packages that aren't in
jammy-backports, can you build the backport with only the jammy-
backports pocket (and jammy-release, jammy-updates of course) and do
some testing on it to verify it works correctly?
That was done in https://launchpad.net/~ubu
** Changed in: studio-controls (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: studio-controls (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Erich Eickmeyer (eeickmeyer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscri
Hi Robie,
On Monday, July 19, 2021 10:56:39 AM PDT Robie Basak wrote:
> Hi Erich,
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:18:36AM -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
> > TL;DR: Don't sunset the backports, but reform the process.
>
> Ubuntu is a meritocracy. We invite any
ly backport. Not with
direct repository access, but by lowering the bar in the process. The backport
process, as it stands, it very, very restrictive. In some ways, it's more
restrictive than an SRU, which seems backwards to me.
TL;DR: Don't sunset the backports, but reform
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ * Users of nvidia-smi in nvidia-utils-460 are running across this
+ issue:
+
+ /usr/bin/nvidia-modprobe: unrecognized option: "-s"
+
+ * At this point, nvidia-smi is not returning the desired output.
+
+ * Description of nvidia-smi follows:
+
+ NVIDIA
** No longer affects: nvidia-modprobe (Ubuntu)
** No longer affects: nvidia-modprobe (Ubuntu Focal)
** No longer affects: nvidia-modprobe (Ubuntu Groovy)
** No longer affects: nvidia-modprobe (Ubuntu Hirsute)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters,
Disregard Comment #5. I went ahead and did it.
https://launchpad.net/~eeickmeyer/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+build/20390685
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905613
Title:
Pleas
Please attach build logs or build this in a PPA and link to that PPA to
help with the backporting process.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905613
Title:
Please backport
Please test the reverse dependencies, otherwise this package will remain
unbackported.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905613
Title:
Please backport v4l2loopback 0.12.5
** Also affects: inkscape (Ubuntu Groovy)
Importance: Wishlist
Assignee: Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: inkscape (Ubuntu Groovy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backpo
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Triaged => Invalid
** Changed in: raring-backports
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Feisty Backports.
Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu Backporters
https://
** No longer affects: ubuntustudio
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Feisty Backports.
Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu Backporters
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965
Title:
[needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video a
Went ahead and closed in Ubuntu Studio.
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
Importance: Wishlist => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to raring-backports.
Ma
Is this even still a thing? Last comment on this bug was over 7 years
ago.
** Changed in: ubuntustudio
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to raring-backports.
Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu Ba
Considering Hardy is long-since EOL, this needs to be a "will not fix".
** Changed in: hardy-backports
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
21 matches
Mail list logo
