The approval was meant for 0.2.2-1
Sorry for any confusion.
** Changed in: feisty-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = In Progress
--
Please backport istanbul for feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113487
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Approved for Feisty Backports
** Changed in: feisty-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Backport DOSBox 0.70 to Feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113838
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for
Approved for backporting
** Changed in: feisty-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
easytag 2.1 brings image support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113832
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for
Approved for feisty-backports
** Changed in: feisty-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Backport of pypolicyd-spf 0.3-1 to Feisty and Edgy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113665
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which
Approved for backporting
** Changed in: feisty-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Please backport git-core 1:1.5.1.3-1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111966
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant
Approved
** Changed in: feisty-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Please backport python-django 0.96-1 to Feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115465
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for
Well, it's a cleanbuild and a pretty uninvasive change. Let's approve
this backport despite the lack of groundbreaking merit ;-)
** Changed in: feisty-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Backport mail-notification 4.0.dfsg.1-1 from gutsy
Approved latest version for backporting. Thanks, Scott for your patience
** Changed in: feisty-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Backport of postfix-policyd-spf-perl 2.004-0ubuntu1 to Feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114274
You received this bug notification
Approved for backporting
** Changed in: feisty-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Please backport gcstar 1.1.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113877
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for
Approved for backporting
** Changed in: feisty-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Blender 2.44 backport
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118884
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty
Approved for backporting
** Changed in: feisty-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Please backport homebank 3.3-0ubuntu1 from gutsy (universe)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117581
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters,
Approved for backporting, xmoto and xmoto-edit
** Changed in: feisty-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Please backport xmoto and xmoto-edit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116669
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters,
Approved for backporting
** Changed in: feisty-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Please backport ddclient 3.7.1-0ubuntu1 from Gutsy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116654
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the
Do you have a bug number? I searched through edgy-backports to no avail
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
It should build now, just have to give-back it. Poke a build deity :D
On 6/7/07, Mario Đanić [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we do anything about this? Or should this bug be closed?
--
Please backport brasero CD burning tool from Ubuntu Edgy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63452
You received
ah, how cool, I'll look more at this tomorrow and make a decision by the
end of the week.
On 5/29/07, Mikael Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you replace libnss3-dev with libnss-dev in the pidgin Build-Depends,
you don't need an updated eds.
--
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
I am currently analyzing if the eds dependency will have any negative
consequences. Otherwise, it should be good for backporting. We will handle
the plugins after the backport of pidgin is complete.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe
Ok, for extensions: Can someone test to see if Thunderbird 1.5.00 will
be uninstalled if I request to install an extension recompiled against
2.0.0.0? Or, if it works against 1.5.0.0 still If that's not the
case, then I'd be very worried to backport extensions.
--
Backport Thunderbird
There is no need to vote for packages. It simply clutters up the bug
report and makes comments harder to see. The only appropriate comments on
Backports bug reports are comments about how a pbuilder or prevu built
candidate package functions.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
. The other Backporters should
be around, and I can be reached by e-mail for particularly urgent backport
requests.
Take care and thanks for using and/or contributing to the Backports Project,
John Dong
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings
Talked to Scott on IRC -- Accepted for backporting (Feisty-Edgy)
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = In Progress
--
Backport pyspf-2.0.3-0ubuntu1 from Feisty to Edgy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112463
You received this bug notification because you are a
Accepted for feisty-backports
** Changed in: feisty-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Backport of spamassassin 3.2.0-ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112456
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the
ok, so we need... thunderbird, thunderbird-locales, and thunderbird-
gnome-support?
--
Backport Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 to Feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports.
Public bug reported:
irssi 0.8.11-0ubuntu1 is in Gutsy, and backports and runs great on
Feisty. A lot of miscellaneous enhancements and useful changes in
behavior. There are no compatibility issue, not even with existing
scripts from Feisty's irssi
Tested and approved for backporting to Feisty.
Hold your horses man, packages haven't even been uploaded to Debian
Experimental yet! When things settle and we get an upload in Ubuntu, I
will take a look. I've already begun to play a bit with Debian SVN
packaging. It looks promising and backportable when it comes out.
Please reopen this bug
Public bug reported:
My KTorrent 2.1.4 packaging has been uploaded to Gutsy. I've already
provided unofficial pbuilder'ed packages to upstream and their community
has not found any problems with them. Since KTorrent 2.1, there has been
numerous bugfixes, performance improvements, and a new web
The original bugreport shows that MOTU's rather backport than SRU this,
so I'll approve this:
silky | 0.5.4-0.1 | feisty/universe | source, i386
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Please backport silky 0.5.4 to edgy
I'd rather not backport the new version of yada; are there bug reports
open for Edgy's phpmyadmin? Such serious issues with the package should
warrant a SRU.
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
phpmyadmin backport
gramps | 2.2.6-1ubuntu1 | feisty/universe | source, all
gramps | 2.2.6-1ubuntu1 | gutsy/universe | source, all
gramps | 2.2.6-1ubuntu1~edgy1 | edgy-backports/universe | source, all
gramps |2.2.7-2 | unstable | source, all
It is currently not in Gutsy, but is in Unstable,
A backport of cdbs was not desired due to various behavioral changes.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = Rejected
--
cdbs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/51560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug
Trivial bugfix, rejected, rather handle through SRU.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
xalan man page document incorrect options
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Attachment added: debdiff dapper-proposed
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7468563/debdiff
--
xalan man page document incorrect options
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for
I did; the standard procedure for approving a backport is for a member
of the Ubuntu Backporters team to change status to in progress and
subscribe ubuntu-archive. There is no specific assignee, and ubuntu-
archive has also told me that they would prefer being subscribed rather
than assigned.
--
Tentatively, Feisty+2
--
Request Postfix 2.3 Backport
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/55599
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Dapper Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Fails to build
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
Update to 0.10 in Dapper
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/52879
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Backporting zulrunner will introduce unwanted conflicts/replacements of
libnspr4-dev, etc.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
xulrunner
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
bacula 1.38.11
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54686
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Dapper Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing
Approved, low-risk trivial backport of new package.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = In Progress
--
tremulous
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54175
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact
Rejected due to previous rationale... It is too risky for the backports
team.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
Request Postfix 2.3 Backport
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/55599
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
This is a higher-risk backport because the introduction of newer libsane
might break support for existing hardware along with adding support for
newer hardware.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
libsane and libsane-extras 1.0.18 backport wanted
No longer backportable; Feisty version has specific patches for
python2.5 support.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
Revelation Password Manager
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/55119
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
mediawiki | 1:1.7~dapper1 | dapper-backports/universe | source, all
mediawiki | 1:1.7~edgy1 | edgy-backports/universe | source, all
The latest version in Feisty already backported.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Fix Released
--
Mediawiki
Is this a backports request for some package?
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
broken java implementation for traditional Chinese fonts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/55970
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Approved; Need to backport from Feisty:
mondo
mindi
mindi-busybox
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = In Progress
--
Backport request for Mondo/Mindi 2.08-2-2 in Dapper
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54798
You received this bug notification because you are
Approved
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = In Progress
--
Kile 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/56256
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Dapper Backports.
--
Approved for backporting (See previous comment for necessary source
change debdiff)
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Assignee: John Dong = (unassigned)
Status: Unconfirmed = In Progress
--
Backport bzr 0.13-0ubuntu1 from Feisty to Edgy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/76382
Does not build against Edgy's libgpod:
- Considering libgpod-dev (= 0.4)
Tried versions: 0.3.2-1.1ubuntu1
- Does not satisfy version, not trying
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
backport gtkpod-aac
Confirmed, B/I/R for me
I'm +1'ing the backport because after looking over the diffs for the
bugfixes, they're pretty intrusive and will likely not make it through
SRU.
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Importance: Undecided = Low
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
--
Please
* Bump version of libopenobex1-dev build dependency to 1.3-3 to get rid of
the libusb dependency
The version bump was done to get rid of an erroneous dependency, which is not a
terribly big point for Edgy... I will prepare a debdiff and also do a bit of
testing with my phone.
--
Approved;
I'm using this build of openafs for some time now on the athena.mit.edu
cell, and it works just fine.
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = In Progress
--
Please backport Openafs 1.4.4-1 to edgy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90711
You received this
Rejected as a backport, this is a 3-liner patch, should be done as SRU.
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
Undefined symbol in Xorg tdfx server
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89581
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The linked bug is due to a mismatch in Ndiswrapper userspace vs kernel
driver version in a development release of Feisty. This is not the case
with Edgy -- the versions are matched. Backporting would in fact unmatch
the version and cause problems for everyone using ndiswrapper.
** Changed in:
Surely enough, it works just fine with that build-dep bumped down.
Here's a debdiff with that change. Archive admins, please sponsor!
+1
** Attachment added: source-change debdiff
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7335710/obex.debdiff
--
backport request - obexftp-0.19-7
Approved for backporting
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = In Progress
--
backport request - obexftp-0.19-7
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/91274
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for
I have reverified against 1.2.3-0ubuntu1
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = In Progress
--
wesnoth 1.2.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/79139
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Edgy
The changes between Dapper and Feisty python-support are enormous
What is the justification that such a backport is even remotely safe to
the sanity of the Python subsystem?
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info
--
Please backport python-support
SRU-candidate patch available, please do bug fixes via SRU and not
backports.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
Assertion failure in OSPF
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48848
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Approved for backporting: mpd from *edgy-security* to dapper-backports
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
Status: Unconfirmed = In Progress
--
MPD Critical bug, please update to 0.12.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94238
You received this bug
Backports Team does not (and is not authorized) to handle bugfix-only
updates, unless the SRU path has no chance. I have not seen this the
case, so as of now, the backports request is rejected. Reopen if SRU
fails.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = Rejected
**
I'm sorry, I misunderstood. This backport is now approved.
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Trac 0.10.3-1 needed in edgy-backports
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/76332
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Accepted for Edgy Backports
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
[backport] Gcin 1.3.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83364
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Edgy
Approved for backporting
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Please backport Beagle 0.2.16 to edgy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83978
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Request: Nmap and NmapFE
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84129
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Edgy Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports
Approved version: wireshark | 0.99.4-6 | feisty/universe | source,
i386
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Request: Update Wireshark
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84468
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Approved for Edgy:tuxtype | 1.5.6.dfsg1-3ubuntu4 |feisty |
source, i386
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Please update Tuxtype package to 1.5.6 (from feisty)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84295
You received this bug notification
From previous experience with Kino, I remember there were several source
packages that need to be backported for kino to be fully backported.
Anyone analyzed what these were?
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = Needs Info
--
Please backport Kino 0.9.2 from Feisty
I agree, now there is no reason why to deprive Edgy of shiny new Tomboy
features.
This backport is approved.
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Please reconsider backport of Tomboy to Edgy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84649
You received this
This is rejected for the same reason it was rejected earler:
* By backporting, every gaim extension/plugin in the repositories will have to
be sent for a rebuild, which is an intrusive operation
* There is a good chance that some plugins won't build, and therefore a new
version needs to be
Backports is not meant to provide security or bugfix updates -- both of
which should be handed by the SRU process.
Are there any new features in this release that are worth having?
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = Needs Info
--
Rkhunter : Please backport
Approved
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Backport dvd95
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85680
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Edgy Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports
Approved for Edgy
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Please backport tuxpaint 0.9.16 to Edgy and Dapper
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85532
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug
tuxpaint | 1:0.9.16-1ubuntu2~dapper1 | dapper-backports | source, i386
Already in Dapper
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Fix Released
--
Please backport tuxpaint 0.9.16 to Edgy and Dapper
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85532
You received this bug
- Considering python-dev (= 2.5)
Tried versions: 2.4.3-11ubuntu3
Right. I however wonder if this is a real dependency, I'll go ask later today
and see if I can debdiff it out.
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Assignee: (unassigned) = John Dong
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
Backport this to edgy, dapper?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88078
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Dapper Backports.
--
Approved
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Backport alltray
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85679
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Edgy Backports.
--
Approved
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
A usefull software for manipulating pictures : encadre-image
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89232
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug
Approved for backporting
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Please backport gajim 0.11.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/87764
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Edgy
Approved flup for edgy
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Backport this to edgy, dapper?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88078
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Dapper
Accepted
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Please backport cdparanoia (+libparanoia)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/91476
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Edgy
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
backport ksniffer 0.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90859
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Edgy Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports
Can you ls -al /dev/bus/usb/00*/*
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Importance: Undecided = High
--
backported libgphoto can't import from canon S1 IS version from egdy does
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/91265
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Approved
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
backport cmake 2.4.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90860
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Edgy Backports.
--
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 69438 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/69438
No, this kind of bug should be fixed as a Stable Release Update
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = Rejected
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status:
Sebastien, this bug sounds more candidate for a SRU, no?
--
desktop-file-utils 0.12
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92069
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Edgy Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
Sorry about the feisty nomination.. clicked wrong button.
--
glosstex depends on tetex and cannot be installed with texlive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Edgy Backports.
--
* Switched the dependencies from only TeTeX to TeTeX or TeXLive
(closes: #377525)
This sounds like a simple fix that can be done via SRU relatively
easily. Redirecting there...
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = Rejected
--
fig2ps depends on tetex
Approved for Edgy
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Please backport alpine from Feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92605
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Edgy
Please evaluate as a SRU?
** Changed in: fig2ps (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Unconfirmed
--
fig2ps depends on tetex
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90474
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Edgy Backports.
--
Approved for Edgy
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
GnuCash 2.0.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93191
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Edgy Backports.
--
Approved for Edgy Backports
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Please backport sylpheed (2.3.1-1~ubuntu1) to edgy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66292
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the
Thanks, I will take a look at this very soon.
--
Can't upgrade nexuiz from edgy-backports
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Edgy Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
Approved
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
please backport brasero 0.5.2-0ubuntu1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96015
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug contact for Edgy
Backport approved for Edgy
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
gtk-gnutella thinks it's too old to start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92160
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the bug
After talking with Sebastien in IRC, I now approve this backport.
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
desktop-file-utils 0.12
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92069
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters,
Yikes umm, do these cameras work with the Feisty beta?
--
backported libgphoto can't import from canon S1 IS version from egdy does
https://launchpad.net/bugs/91265
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
= Medium
Assignee: (unassigned) = John Dong
--
Can't upgrade nexuiz from edgy-backports
https://launchpad.net/bugs/95002
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Approved for backporting
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
Status: Unconfirmed = In Progress
--
please backport lirc (0.8.1+cvs20070310-0ubuntu1)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/95097
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Approved for backporting; required to make nexuiz backport useful.
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
nexuiz-data not backported with nexuiz (uninstallable)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/94807
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
Hi, Bill
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. Can you please file a bug against
Ubuntu's dnsmasq package in Launchpad, with this information, asking for a
Stable Release Update (SRU)?
On 3/21/07, Bill Aitken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We have been experiencing a problem with dnsmasq,
Feisty version also approved for edgy and dapper backports to fix this
USN for Backports users.
** Also affects: dapper-backports (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
** Also affects: edgy-backports (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
**
301 - 400 of 1048 matches
Mail list logo
