Update 7 is currently not in Edgy. We will await its packaging first.
Marking this as affecting Ubuntu's sun-java5 source package until we get a new
upload.
** Also affects: sun-java5 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriaged
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Java Runtime Environment Version 5.0 Update
Not in Edgy yet.
Please reopen/refile when it is present in Edgy.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
inkscape 0.44
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50841
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Package approved for backporting. ubuntu-archive has been subscribed.
--
Please backport 0.7.1 from edgy to dapper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50834
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Not currently in Edgy repository. Marking as Needs Info
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info
** Also affects: scilab (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriaged
Status: Unconfirmed
--
scilab 4
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50840
--
ubuntu-backports
Awaiting new wpasupplicant -- marking Needs Info in the meantime.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info
--
wpasupplicant in dapper doesn't work with madwifi-ng
https://launchpad.net/bugs/47144
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
No newer version in Edgy yet. Marking as Needs Info until that happens.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Importance: Untriaged = Medium
--
kopete 0.12
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50465
--
Not in Edgy -- marking as Needs Info until a new edgy package arrives.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Importance: Untriaged = Low
Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info
** Also affects: tilda (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriaged
Status: Unconfirmed
--
tilda .09.2
Marking Ubuntu tilda sources as affected --
When you get the spare time, please upload a newer tilda package into
Edgy :)
--
tilda .09.2
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50461
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Using Needs Info instead of rejected, so that it shows up in future
searches
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Rejected = Needs Info
--
inkscape 0.44
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50841
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Looking into it.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Importance: Untriaged = Low
Assignee: (unassigned) = John Dong
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
--
ttf-alee 7.3
https://launchpad.net/bugs/51065
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https
Package approved for backporting to Dapper.
Ubuntu-archive subscribed; In Progress marked.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Assignee: John Dong = (unassigned)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
ttf-alee 7.3
https://launchpad.net/bugs/51065
--
ubuntu-backports mailing
is not in Dapper. The proper way
to get these packages is through Backports, or by using pbuilder to
build clean Dapper packages.
** Affects: automatix (upstream)
Importance: Untriaged
Assignee: John Dong
Status: In Progress
** Affects: dapper-backports (upstream)
Importance: Low
I'll use pbuilder to properly compile some 1.70 debs. Until then, the
krusader instaler shoud just use Dapper's version.
** Changed in: automatix (upstream)
Assignee: (unassigned) = John Dong
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
** Also affects: dapper-backports (upstream)
Importance
Dapper Backports marked as affected -- a newer Krusader should be
brought in via Backports.
Marking as Needs Info as the package is not in Edgy.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Importance: Untriaged = Low
Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info
** Also affects: krusader (Ubuntu)
Also marked Ubuntu source package krusader as affected. When you guys
get the chance, please sync a newer krusader from Sid (sid is already at
1.70, and that's good for us)
Thanks!
** Changed in: krusader (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
--
[KDE] Krusader uses unsafe
Fixes are under way. Marking as In Progress.
** Changed in: automatix (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
[KDE] Krusader uses unsafe installation method
https://launchpad.net/bugs/51069
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
** Attachment added: Dapper krusader packages
http://librarian.launchpad.net/3158587/krusader-dapper.tar.bz2
--
[KDE] Krusader uses unsafe installation method
https://launchpad.net/bugs/51069
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
0.9.5 uploaded to Edgy
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Needs Info = Confirmed
--
Please backport newer rhythmbox to dapper-backports
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50477
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
** Also affects: dapper-backports (upstream)
Importance: Untriaged
Status: Unconfirmed
--
wpasupplicant in dapper doesn't work with madwifi-ng
https://launchpad.net/bugs/47144
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
It's been uploaded now. Thanks, Daniel!
** Changed in: planner (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed = Fix Released
--
Please Backport Planner 0.14
https://launchpad.net/bugs/49585
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
re-opened; evaluating builds now.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Rejected = Unconfirmed
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
--
Please Backport Planner 0.14
https://launchpad.net/bugs/49585
--
ubuntu-backports mailing
Excellent. I will take the time to confirm that it builds fine and runs,
and if everything goes smoothly, this will be in Backports.
Thanks for your request.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Importance: Untriaged = Low
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
--
Please backport
** Also affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriaged
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Rhytmbox 0.9.5
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50477
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
I'd like to propose the idea (and thus discuss the implementation) of kernel backports for Dapper.Kernel 2.6.15 is already starting to get old for some users, citing new drivers that require 2.6.16+ to build or a newer ALSA framework that fixes problems with sound, the new Core Duo CPU scheduler,
** Bug 49807 has been marked a duplicate of this bug
--
Unable to use modules in dapper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/45703
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 49403 ***
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 49403
Please could you backport Monodevelop 0.11?
--
Please backport MonoDevelop 0.11
https://launchpad.net/bugs/49753
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Not for backporting. Only packages in the development release of Ubuntu
are eligible for backports. However, if it's in Debian, it has a good
chance of being in Edgy soon :)
--
Backport MediaWiki
https://launchpad.net/bugs/49056
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
There are currently no Ubuntu packages for tovid, so this is a job for
the MOTU team. When a package enters Edgy, then it can be backported.
Please contact the Ubuntu MOTU team to request this package in Edgy.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
Not in Edgy. When this package enters Edgy, we'd be glad to take a look
at backporting it!
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
Please could you backport Monodevelop 0.11?
https://launchpad.net/bugs/49403
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
Really old bug, not to mention from unofficial backports branch.
** Changed in: sysfsutils (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info
--
Incompatible libsysfs and Linux in hoary-backports
https://launchpad.net/bugs/19153
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Sounds like a reasonable request. I'll look into it.
** Changed in: breezy-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
--
Konversation 0.19 for Breezy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/40012
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
grr, wrong button
** Changed in: kaffeine (Ubuntu Breezy)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
kaffeine in breezy backports hasn't received security fix for USN-268-1
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/39267
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
I am looking into it as we speak. There are some build dependencies that have
to be loosened.
** Changed in: kaffeine (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
--
kaffeine in breezy backports hasn't received security fix for USN-268-1
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/39267
--
Backports tracker...
** Also affects: breezy-backports (upstream)
Severity: Normal
Priority: (none set)
Status: Unconfirmed
** Changed in: breezy-backports (upstream)
Severity: Normal = Critical
Assignee: (unassigned) = John Dong
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
In order to build, I need build-dependencies to look like this:
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.2.0), cdbs, automake1.8, autoconf,
libqt3-compat-headers, kdelibs4-dev (= 4:3.2.3-2), libxine-dev,
linux-kernel-headers, libxtst-dev
(no version on libxine-dev)
--
kaffeine in breezy backports
sane is a library, and we do not backport libraries.
** Changed in: breezy-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed = Rejected
--
[Request] Sane 1.0.17
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/39159
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Kernel related stuff are not backported due to compatibility and stability
issues. What fixes your card may totally break someone else's configuraton.
Also, when security updates to kernels are released, these become a headache to
maintain.
P.S. Dapper now has the latest NVidia drivers once
no, no, no, as in, backports does not modify Dapper sources period.
On 4/11/06, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/04/06 at 13:54 +, John Dong wrote:
I can't take that though; All backports have to be built from Ubuntu
Dapper
sources.
The package was built from Dapper
I will take a look at the Dapper version.
** Changed in: breezy-backports (upstream)
Assignee: (unassigned) = John Dong
--
[backport request] gthumb 2.7.2 or higher (2.7.5 is in dapper)
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/38151
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports
Current Dapper version build failure:
sed -e s|[EMAIL PROTECTED]@|/usr/lib/gthumb|g \
./GNOME_GThumb_Viewer.server.in.in GNOME_GThumb_Viewer.server.temp \
mv -f GNOME_GThumb_Viewer.server.temp GNOME_GThumb_Viewer.server.in
LC_ALL=C ../../intltool-merge -o -u -c ../../po/.intltool-merge-cache
I currently do not have list administrator privileges. I believe Martin (Mez) is the only one with them.
On 4/5/06, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,I initially sent my [REQUEST] librmagick-ruby email on March 20th, butit was held waiting for the moderator's approval because I wasn't (at
Public bug reported:
Affects: breezy-backports (upstream)
Severity: Normal
Priority: (none set)
Assignee: James Troup
Status: In Progress
Description:
scponly is a fairly simple package, in universe, but is susceptible to
some security problems that are fixed in
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/3906
Task: ubuntu scite
Status: Unconfirmed = In Progress
Comment:
Approved. Package works fine in Breezy.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/36599
Changed in: Breezy Backports (upstream)
Product: Breezy Backports = hotplug
Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Core Development Team
Comment:
Not Backports related.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/36599
Also affects: hotplug (Ubuntu)
Severity: Normal
Priority: (none set)
Status: Unconfirmed
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/6231
Changed in: Breezy Backports (upstream)
Assignee: (unassigned) = James Troup
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
do they.You download the source put it in the /opt package I believe then you justtype in the console python /opt/yourpackage.pyIt should work.
Also Ubuntu MOTU is Masters of the Universe.Regards,Marc John Dong wrote: Not in Debian Sid, not in Dapper. Please contact one of these two (Debian
Not in Debian Sid, not in Dapper. Please contact one of these two (Debian maintainer, Ubuntu MOTU) about pulling in a new package, then we can get this for Breezy.Probably it won't go into Dapper due to UVF either, so this may be a Dapper+1 backports to Breezy/Dapper.
On 3/23/06, Brian Gurtler
strace by default only outputs to stderr, so redirecting stdout will just give you the regular output. You can either use strace katapult 2 filename, or strace katapult -o filename.
On 2/14/06, Martin Meredith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Public bug report
Umm, well, I've looked into it once, but it was way over my head how R
packages are organized. And thanks to their wonderfully differentiated
name, googling about it was a REAL breeze :).
Who around here is familiar with the R packages?
On 2/10/06, maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Already in Dapper. Now, just a question of if it builds or not :)
On 2/10/06, David Coeurjolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Darcs is a revision control system. Darcs is simple to learn and use,
with a powerful new approach to meet the needs of today's distributed
software projects. Darcs is
(1) Is it actually possible to get that done without adjusting Dapper sources?
(2) What is the advantage of doing this through Backports vs Riddel's wonderful Kubuntu repositories?
On 2/6/06, Martin Meredith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so - well - I'm currently backporting KDE 3.5.1 ... it's a
spe approved for backporting to Breezy.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Requests are in the process of being migrated to Launchpad.
On 1/28/06, Shirish Agarwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, I have already filed the request in
http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=117126 but have heardnothing if therequest has been denied or not. I did read the readme before
in a Breezy environment, it still looks for the Dapper version of the dependency, which can't be found.
how should I go about getting the latest version of rythmbox now?
The safest way is to use apt-get source to build it yourself. John Dong wrote:
not gonna build, the way it looks. On 1/19/06
Martin (or anyone else interested), can you help me sift through some of the requests over at the forums? Most of them are invalid (Not in Dapper) but some of them are indeed good.I have a lot of robotics work going on for the next month and a half, and basically have no spare time at all... Sorry
LOL, happy holidays, Stephan -- take a break :)On 12/28/05, Stephan Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gforget what I saidit's totally clear, that I'm wrong, when I'm looking in the wrong repos :(
If you check here http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/k/k3b/ we cansee, that we are
be displayed).
Is this project aimed at the end user, or those with immediate experience who want to assist in building backports; or both ? Thanks,skora. 2005/12/26, John Dong
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This would be a great idea, and thanks Martin for taking the
initiative. I `am having to deal with more
removed from the repository.On 12/26/05, Sam Liddicott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Dong wrote: My vision for it: Users enter a backport request into a web interface. The request is quickly run through a set of rules (i.e. no libraries, package blacklist), and then a build is done.
After the build
I personally would have this step restricted. Currently, REVU doesn'toffer any binary .debs at all, and I don't have urgent reasons to
change that. Perhaps we can offer downloads of binaries to reviewers,okay. But I wouldn't like to offer these binaries to end users,because I don't want they to
LOL, agreed :)On 12/26/05, Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/27/05, John Dong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I personally would have this step restricted. Currently, REVU doesn't offer any binary .debs at all, and I don't have urgent reasons to
change that. Perhaps we can offer
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/3852
Comment:
Backport package tested; build requested. Should be in the Backports
repo in a week.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Let's bring openafs up to 1.4 final :)
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
totem approved for backporting to Breezy.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
nautilus-actions has been approved for backporting to Breezy (new Universe addition)
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
totem approved for backporting to Breezy.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
sbackup is approved for backporting to Breezy.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
No -- it requires quite a deal of source modification in order to
recreate the work of kubuntu.org, and it's unnecessary duplication of
effort.On 12/1/05, Miguel P.C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!.I've seen KDE 3.5 is out and there are even packages for Breezy. Wouldit be possible to merge it into
I need a bit more time to think about this backport, but so far I approve :)On 12/1/05, Marc Wiriadisastra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no, Sun Java uses a different file... that's Blackdown that's being
disabled, hence the then using Sun Java part.Yeah thats how I got it to work.Doing it this way
It's still in consideration whether or not it'll happen. Right now, there's a forum sticky in which I'm documenting my progress towards doing it.Currently, around 50 source packages depend on firefox and will likely require rebuilding. In addition, whether or not security updates can be assured is
On 12/1/05, Stephan Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, except arts/libao + GAIM is causing crashes... oh well, I complain too much :)well don't use arts...and what is about gaim?For some silly reason if sound output is put on Automatic in GAIM, on my system it goes through (or attempts so)
Patience... but gthumb is approved for backporting to Breezy.On 12/1/05, Marc Wiriadisastra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Compiles fine, installs fine and runs fine. 2.6.7
is the version in breezy. Regards, Marc -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
so it runs fine with current mono version?Any mono folks listening in, is this safe to backport?(sorry, I'm really paranoid whenever I make any sort of Mono connection)
On 12/1/05, matthew nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
same here.On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 09:21 +0800, Marc Wiriadisastra wrote:
Very well. Tomboy approved for backporting to Breezy.On 12/1/05, Travis Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/1/05, John Dong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so it runs fine with current mono version? Any mono folks listening in, is this safe to backport? (sorry, I'm really paranoid whenever I make any
Remember that VLC backport, and the whole i386 buildd weird failure problem? Well, VLC apparently suffered that too, same errors in buildlog.As a result, I'd like to request VLC to be rebuilt, the current breezy-backports version, NOT the Dapper version. (The newest Dapper version no longer
the chroot or the pbuilder config file.
thanks for the help getting set up guys.matt nicholson[EMAIL PROTECTED]sjoeboo.comOn Wed, 2005-11-30 at 09:19 -0500, John Dong wrote:
meh, either way is fine... I've just never really caught on to pbuilder... At times I appreciate the speed of the unpack-and-hack
comix approved for backporting to Breezy... updated version.-- Forwarded message --From: Mike Basinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Nov 30, 2005 1:26 AMSubject: Re: ComixTo: John Dong [EMAIL PROTECTED]Fine for me.
MikeOn 11/29/05, John Dong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
comix | 1.6-1
it or what?thanks for the help again.matt nicholson[EMAIL PROTECTED]sjoeboo.com
On Nov 30, 2005, at 10:00 AM, matthew nicholson wrote: excelent, exactly what i needed to here. On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 09:55 -0500, John Dong wrote:
On 11/30/05, matthew nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hmm, okay. one
On 11/30/05, matt nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
alright then, that makes it even simpler, thanks. what about theprocedure for after the package is built? just notify someoneofficialthat it builds fine or what? thanks again John, you've beenpretty quick and helpfully.
Either file a request at
well, sure, you can run it from a chroot, but from what he said, it seems like he's already got a vmware setup, so he might as well use it :)On 11/30/05, Reinhard Tartler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On 11/30/05, John Dong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/30/05, matt nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Cool, though I'd like you to use it as your primary browser for a few days of browsing, including visiting sites with Flash or Java or multimedia content, making sure they work at least as well in 2.0 as in 1.3.
On 11/30/05, Marc Wiriadisastra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Build's, installs and runs
I could've sworn I sent it, but couldn't find it in my outgoing mail
records... Anyway, eog from Dapper is approved for backporting to
Breezy... I apologize if you already got this request.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
On 11/29/05, Marc Wiriadisastra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Backports team.A request for this has been made on the forums.This is my reply.Quote:checking for IPOD... configure: error: iPod explicitly requested butlibgpod couldn't be found
make: *** [config.status] Error 1Build FAILED... 512Do you
Ok, this will take more testing and review before acceptance, since being the backbone WM of GNOME and all, it's a much deeper backport than what's typically done.
On 11/29/05, Marc Wiriadisastra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was a request in the forums for this.It backported fine.Compiled fine
Cool, confirmed all is fine as Matt states. Just need Ubuntu folks to put the deps on.On 11/29/05, Mike Basinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Nevermind found my error.Mikematt nicholson wrote:
odd, cause i got the newest libgpod and rhythmbox to build just perfect last night about 30 minutes after it
build-dep fixed in -0ubuntu2... awaiting upload and testing...On 11/29/05, Mike Basinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Built it fine on my box (after I got the right libgpod files). Really
enjoying the new podcast feature.--D. Michael Basinger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Web: http://www.mikesplanet.net--
On 11/29/05, Marc Wiriadisastra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey allThese are all my build errors with this./usr/bin/dpkg-buildpackage: line 175: fakeroot: command not foundPlease install fakeroot via APT first.
It builds those and I had an error initialising gstreamer while runningit but as I said I
On 11/29/05, Marc Wiriadisastra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tested this and my results are as follows.This is what I get for amarokdpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: kdelibs4-dev (=4:3.5-rc2) libtunepimp2-dev (= 0.3.0-2.1)(backports)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/ubp-compile-temp/amarok-
1.3.6$
On 11/29/05, Marc Wiriadisastra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It builds fine.You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these.The following packages have unmet dependencies:gnochm: Depends: gconf2 (= 2.6.2-1) but it is not installedDepends: python-gtk2 (=
2.2.0) but it is not
ktorrent from Dapper approved for Breezy backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Confirmed. baobab approved for backporting to Breezy.On 11/29/05, Marc Wiriadisastra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:It build, installs and runs fine.Regards,Marc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-Version: GnuPG v1.4.1
google ubp-build.pyI run ubp-build.py inside a chroot, which is cleaned fairly frequently. As long as you don't do stupid things to the chroot, it'll stay fairly clean...Others use pbuilder.
On 11/29/05, matthew nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i was wondering if anyone had any tips on
Yep, both are indeed safe for backporting... Didn't notice that gnochm was a new Dapper universe addition.On 11/29/05, Marc Wiriadisastra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/29/05, Marc Wiriadisastra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It builds fine. You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these.
alright, great to know... Though we first need to look at compatibility with kubuntu.org update repositories after a flurry of KDE 3.5 updates recently.
On 11/29/05, Marc Wiriadisastra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was the chroot.I installed at work on a not chrooted environment.Ifrun from console
gnochm and pychm both approved for backporting to Breezy... Both are new Universe additions. gnochm depends on pychm at runtime, so both need to be backported in order for gnochm to be installable.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
xmoto approved for Breezy Backports.-- Forwarded message --From: Marc Wiriadisastra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 29, 2005 9:12 PMSubject: x-moto 0.1.8To: ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.comHey All,It wasn't in breezy a request on the forums for it.Compiles fine,
installs and runs.I
xmms-coverviewer approved for backporting.-- Forwarded message --From: Mike Basinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 26, 2005 8:41 PMSubject: xmms-coverviewerTo: John Dong [EMAIL PROTECTED]xmms-coverviewer is good to backport, the drapper version is much more
stable.Mike--D. Michael
bittornado approved for backporting to Breezy... Let's bring ourselves to the GTK2 future :)
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
On 11/25/05, Marc Wiriadisastra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a list of packages that are approved or is it just from theforums?The forums; mailing list archives (I CC a copy of build requests to the list)
Also is there a way of marking them as approved then approved then done?Yes -- the
Then upload them somewhere or just point out that they work?
Just test it yourself and make sure it works well.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
901 - 1000 of 1048 matches
Mail list logo
