Approved for backporting same package to hardy.
** Also affects: hardy-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Please Backport php5-xdebug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214030
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which
Apologies, I left this bug in the back of my mind.
Current package in intrepid (2.0.3-1) Approved for backporting
--
Please Backport php5-xdebug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214030
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is
Apologies, the source package is now called xdebug with the binary
being php5-xdebug
--
Please Backport php5-xdebug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214030
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Gutsy Backports.
--
Please hold off on this backport for php-xdebug_2.0.2-0ubuntu4, which
will fix issues on certain systems.
--
Please Backport php5-xdebug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214030
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Public bug reported:
Requesting Backport of php-xdebug
Prevu Builds fine (once working round the issue of it thinking that the
Original-Maintainer thing left on the end of the file is actually a
filename... weird place to put the field in the .changes)
Installs fine on gutsy, and works fine.
** Changed in: gutsy-backports
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Please Backport php5-xdebug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214030
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
Confirmed this, kaffeine in -backports replaces kaffeine-xine.
Kubuntu-desktop now reccomends kaffeine.
Shouldn't the kaffeine Provide kaffeine-xine in circumstances like
this?
** Changed in: kaffeine (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
[kaffeine] from gutsy-backports breaks
Kees, for rar this is true, however, it needs a small modification to
use the statically linked binary (as we found out in debian!) the
package rar-3.7b1-2 in debian has the neccessary changes.
Regarding unrar - it's the above patch
(http://librarian.launchpad.net/6412402/fix_cve_3.5.4_clean)
Quote from email
All these changes in rarvm.cpp code are related to endianness issue
on big endian computers. So users may notice these fixes only on big
endian machine.
Besides, I forgot to mention that real vulnerability was fixed
in GetPassword function in consio.cpp. So if you use 3.6.x
So, it seems that the real issue is in consio.cpp and wasnt in 3.7.2 ...
Patch attached for 3.5.4
** Attachment added: Patch for version 3.5.4 of unrar-nonfree
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6394099/new_fix_cve
--
Security update for rar/unrar (CVE-2007-0855)
rar 1:3.7b1-0ubuntu11 (typo on upload for XubuntuY!) approved for
backporting to edgy (This is to replace the currently backported version
of rar, which includes the security issue, not to work as a security
fix)
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = In Progress
Clean patch for 3.5.4 (as advised by debian Security team)
** Attachment added: Patch for unrar-nonfree 3.5.4 (clean)
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6412402/fix_cve_3.5.4_clean
--
Security update for rar/unrar (CVE-2007-0855)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/84657
--
ubuntu-backports mailing
Seems like a build fail due to a required depend on autotools...
--
KTorrent 2.0.3 FTBFS on ppc
https://launchpad.net/bugs/66846
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
I'll have a look at backporting the current feisty twinkle to dapper...
Twinkle's a good app to have
--
Twinkle Backport from Edgy (0.71?)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/51208
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
Attached is patch for 3.5.4 (edgy and dapper)
** Attachment added: Patch for version 3.5.4 of unrar-nonfree
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6392435/fix_cve_3.5.4
** Also affects: rar (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #410580
Public bug reported:
Packager unrar-nonfree is affected with CVE-2007-0855
Package uploaded to feisty, changes need to be made also in dapper,
edgy, and edgy-backports
** Affects: edgy-backports (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
** Affects: rar (Ubuntu)
Patch for breezy unrar-nonfreee
** Attachment added: Patch for version 3.4.3 of unrar-nonfree
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6392463/fix_cve_3.4.3
** Changed in: rar (Ubuntu Feisty)
Status: Unconfirmed = Fix Committed
** Summary changed:
- Needs Security update
+ Security update for
Approved for backporting to dapper (sorry bout the delay, I missed this
one as it showed up in the done list for dapper!)
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Fix Released = Unconfirmed
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
**
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 73447 ***
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 73447
SRU Request to fix Curl Segfault
--
backport curl 7.15.5 from Feisty to Edgy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/73476
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings
more than likely a candidate for SRU... did it work in breezy?
--
Impossible to import nevow on edgy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/61423
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
Current Feisty version uses a ${source:Version} which isn't known in
dapper's dpkg-dev, causing it to error out with
pkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/nagios2/DEBIAN/control' near line
6 package `nagios2':
`Depends' field, reference to `nagios2-common': error in version:
version string is
This builds fine changing ${source:Version} and ${binary:Version} to
${Source-Version}, however, this would break binNMUs in debian - so is
not a bug, and also would create unneccesary delta from debian.
I'm being advised against making delta between Ubuntu/Debian just for
backports, and also
mplayerplug-in (3.25-7ubuntu1~dapper1) dapper-backports; urgency=low
* Automated backport upload; no source changes.
-- John Dong [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:14:51 +0100
However original bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/dapper-backports/+bug/62186
I dont know where this came
- Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.29
2006/11/06 20:20:56 lool Exp $
- Considering build-dep debhelper (= 4.0.0)
- Trying debhelper
- Considering build-dep dpatch
- Trying dpatch
- Considering build-dep intltool
- Trying intltool
- Considering
Or if urgent, poke me..
I'll be going through a few of the requests over the next few days
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 21:44 -0500, John Dong wrote:
Fellow backporters and backports users,
Just wanted to drop off a quick note to everyone out there. Apologies
for my slow response time on backports
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 82138 ***
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 82138
Please backport WordPress 2.1 (to both Edgy and Dapper)
--
Please backport WordPress 2.1 (to both Edgy and Dapper)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/82139
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
Not for backports... SRU
affects /products/dapper-backports
status rejected
affects distros/ubuntu/dapper/rstatd
subscribe motu-sru
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or
Confirmed- subscribed motu-sru
** Changed in: phpgroupware (Ubuntu Dapper)
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
** Changed in: phpgroupware (Ubuntu Edgy)
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
--
Installation fails if no DBMS is available
https://launchpad.net/bugs/65933
--
approved for backporting
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = In Progress
--
backport kxmame
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80579
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
leave this one
--
[SRU] Rebuild octplot to fix UNMETDEPS
https://launchpad.net/bugs/70789
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Public bug reported:
Builds fine on edgy prevu
** Affects: edgy-backports (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Backport rar to edgy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/73182
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or
on hold till fixes are made t prevu package
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: In Progress = Confirmed
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: In Progress = Confirmed
--
Backport prevu
https://launchpad.net/bugs/72725
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
Public bug reported:
Builds fine in edgy prevu
** Affects: edgy-backports (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Backport unrar-nonfree to edgy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/73183
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Fix Released = Confirmed
--
request: brasero 0.5.0
https://launchpad.net/bugs/71067
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
--
(feisty)No icon for brasero
https://launchpad.net/bugs/71546
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
New version ... testing for backportability
--
request: brasero 0.5.0
https://launchpad.net/bugs/71067
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 19:04 +, John Dong wrote:
Also affects edgy-backports; backport of feisty 0ubuntu2 revision would
be a good idea once it hits the archive
Agreed :D ... it's been pushed...
--
(feisty)No icon for brasero
https://launchpad.net/bugs/71546
--
ubuntu-backports
Public bug reported:
Backport to fix castling bug
** Affects: edgy-backports (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Backport knights 0.6-7.1ubuntu2
https://launchpad.net/bugs/70929
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
** Changed in: ubp-hoary (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
smeg: Depends: python-xdg (= 0.14) but 0.9-1 is installed.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1944
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
** Changed in: ubp-hoary (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected
--
k3b crashes when many files dragged into a project
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1844
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Hi there Douglas.
As John's stated, it's not possible to backport firefox without
backporting a lot of different applications with it.
These applications depend on having certain versions of system libraries
in certain places.
The way backports works is to update packages and replace them, not
Public bug reported:
Builds fine on edgy, approved for backport
** Affects: edgy-backports (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Backport katapult 0.3.1.4
https://launchpad.net/bugs/70847
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Please don't reject valid bugs,
As noted above, the brasero package needs (from configure)
libgnomevfs2-dev =2.14.2, whereas the package is B-D on =2.14.1 -
which is still the case, and a bug that needs fixing
** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu)
Status: Rejected = Confirmed
--
Please
will be
recieved correctly by the list.
Once again, I apologise in advance,
Kind Regards,
Martin Meredith
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/30585
Comment:
can you run the following command
strace katapult ~/katapult.strace
Then recreate the bug and attach the resulting file here?
Thanks!
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/30585
Comment:
Sorry - I actually meant strace katapult ~/katapult.strace
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Ok, so - well - I'm currently backporting KDE 3.5.1 ... it's a pain in the
ass- but we're getting there.
Anyways - it's a big job for one person - is anyone else out there willing
to help me test backports?
Once I've got the base stuff done I'll release a pbuild tar.gz ...for
people to use.
Kubuntu repositories?
On 2/6/06, *Martin Meredith* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ok, so - well - I'm currently backporting KDE 3.5.1 ... it's a pain
in the
ass- but we're getting there.
Anyways - it's a big job for one person - is anyone else out
katapult is approved for backporting to breezy ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
*looks*
Oh poop - how did I miss that ... eek - musta overlooked it - James...
can you cancel that request - lol !
Ming Hua wrote:
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 04:27:59AM +, Martin Meredith wrote:
Approved for backporting :D
How? I've actually talked with jdong about this - scim
done the right way, up to date Breezy PBuilder + Dapper
Sources ;D
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 19:01 -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On 11/4/05, Martin Meredith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey... the backports are normally built directly from the distribution
backporting from ... so... no need to make
John Dong wrote:
Can you bring the latest d4x from Dapper to breezy-backports? Thanks.
That'd be interesting, seeing as it doesn't exist at the moment...
James- please ? :P
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
52 matches
Mail list logo
