also backporting debugedit sounds like the correct thing to do
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965800
Title:
debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package bu
> 1. revert Matthias' change from debhelper/13.3.4ubuntu1 (2021-03-19)
> that make use of debugedit (honestly I don't even understand *why*
> he did that)
The file names in the dbgsym packages are based on a hash derived from
the contents of the files. This leads to conflicting files for similar
o
On 26.10.2017 19:31, Tobin Davis wrote:
> So, how does Ubuntu continue to test in their environment, if they are
> not supporting OpenJDK-8 in 14.04? Do they no longer use Jenkins?
no, jenkins was never a supported package Please correct me if I am
wrong.
> Because the current Jenkins LTS releas
On 27.07.2017 00:33, stevenschlansker wrote:
> It is super unhelpful for the Long Term Support release to
> 1) allow its version of Java to hit EOL with no upgrade path
there is no EOL for the openjdk-7 packages in trusty.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Information type changed from Public Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to trusty-backports.
Matching subscriptions: ubuntu-backporters
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1368094
Title:
Please backport op
On 13.10.2015 11:48, cousteau wrote:
> Java 7 is End of Life'd since April:
> https://www.java.com/en/download/faq/java_7.xml
this is only true for the binaries distributed from java.com. OpenJDK 7 is
*not* End of Life.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
this issue is clearly missing somebody who is doing the work. marking as
incomplete.
** Changed in: trusty-backports
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to trusty-backports.
Matching subscripti
oneiric is end of live
** Changed in: openjdk-7 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/807220
Title:
wishlist: backport of op
see https://launchpad.net/~openjdk-r/+archive/ubuntu/ppa
who would commit to updating this package in -backports?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to trusty-backports.
Matching subscriptions: ubuntu-backporters
https://bugs
what advantage is there having it in -backports instead of having it in
a PPA?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Precise Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1176882
Title:
please backport gcc-4.7 in Precise
To m
for now unlikely before the final release, please use an oneiric chroot
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/807220
Title:
wishlist: openjdk-7 package for natty backpor
reopening. this should go to -proposed, as the version in lucid isn't
usable/maintainable.
** Changed in: opengtl (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => New
** Also affects: opengtl (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
backport opengtl-0.9.14 for lucid
https://bugs.la
@Vistaus: As you can see at https://jdk-distros.dev.java.net/ 6u16 was
released. Updating to 6u15 isn't good enough. No, it's not packaged, and
I don't plan to do so. Looking at the Debian package you'll see that it
is now unsupported (orphaned), the package in Ubuntu is community
maintained. So ei
> It's rather a breach of trust
huh? care to elaborate?
instead of complaining, prepare a package and send it to
http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/ for review. It's not rocket science, just
spend the time you use for these "me too" mails for something useful.
--
version 1.6.0_15 is available
https://
Launchpad Bug Tracker schrieb:
> You have been subscribed to a public bug by Leung, Kai-Cheung (kcleung-users):
>
> The final version of Python 3.0 is already available. Please backjport
> to Hardy as this will be a very useful language for developers and
> students.
calm down ... "already" ...
> The patch on that bug report does not appear to be the only size_t related
> change though:
> it is probably worth checking up on what else is in the 2.0.6 release.
did somebody start this?
** Changed in: psycopg2 (Ubuntu Feisty)
Importance: Undecided => High
Status: New => Confirmed
> Looks good for Backports.
No, it doesn't. As the changelog explains, Sun dropped a whole bunch of
code. People using this code see this as a regression.
--
please backport sun-java6 (6-02-0ubuntu1) from gutsy (was: java6 update1 is
released, please update)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1156
sudo update-java-alternative --list
sudo update-java-alternative --auto
sudo update-java-alternative --set java-6-sun
--
[feisty] update-alternatives doesn't notice java6
https://launchpad.net/bugs/84790
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsu
closing the Ubuntu task; if you do want to backport it, the best way is
to start with the dapper packaging. please reopen the dapper-backports
task, if a you have a package available for review
** Changed in: python-setuptools (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
--
Could Setuptools
> As soon as Edgy gets this new hplip, it will be backported.
unlikely; many dependencies did change, and hpiod now runs as root
(dapper's version does not).
--
Please update HPLIP to 1.6.7
https://launchpad.net/bugs/51573
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
http
please don't assign reports to random people
** Changed in: irssi (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Matthias Klose => (unassigned)
--
irssi v0.8.10a
https://launchpad.net/bugs/52312
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinf
** Tags added: cjk
--
broken java implementation for traditional Chinese fonts
https://launchpad.net/bugs/55970
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
please don't move to backports, should go to dapper-updates.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klose
Status: In Progress => Needs Info
--
Java Runtime Environment Version 5.0 Update 7
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50905
--
ubunt
released yesterday
** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klose
Status: Unconfirmed => Fix Released
--
Java Runtime Environment Version 5.0 Update 7
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50905
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubun
07 isn't yet released under the DLJ license
--
Java Runtime Environment Version 5.0 Update 7
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50905
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
25 matches
Mail list logo
