** Description changed:
[Impact]
* python-pyelftools provides a pure-Python library to manipulate ELF
and DWARF files.
* The version currently in Jammy (0.27-1) does not fully support the
DWARF 5 format, which unfortunately leads to many errors when using the
library to work wi
Hi there,
elfutils/0.188-1 has just migrated to lunar-release. Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997189
Title:
[BPO] elfutils/0.188-1 from Lunar
To manage not
** Description changed:
[Impact]
- * python-pyelftools provides a pure-Python library to manipulate ELF
+ * python-pyelftools provides a pure-Python library to manipulate ELF
and DWARF files.
- * The version currently in Jammy (0.27-1) does not fully support the
+ * The version curre
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
* python-pyelftools provides a pure-Python library to manipulate ELF
and DWARF files.
* The version currently in Jammy (0.27-1) does not fully support the
DWARF 5 format, which unfortunately leads to many errors when using the
library to work with the ddeb files g
Thanks, Dan. I'll ping you when elfutils migrates on lunar, then.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997189
Title:
[BPO] elfutils/0.188-1 from Lunar
To manage notificat
Ping.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997189
Title:
[BPO] elfutils/0.188-1 from Lunar
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/
On Sunday, November 20 2022, Thomas Ward wrote:
>> I intend to update Ubuntu's debuginfod instance to use this new
> package in the near future.
>
> By "update" do you mean SRU or via Backports? If you are not going to
> be doing this via Backports, then I would suggest that you hunt an SRU
> on
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
* elfutils ships many ELF/DWARF related tools that are interesting for
users and developers of low level code.
* More specifically, elfutils ships the debuginfod library and server.
The latest upstream version (0.188) introduces many interesting features
that shou
utils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Sergio Durigan Junior (sergiodj)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: elfutils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: freeipmi (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962743
Title:
[BPO] freeipmi/1.6.9-2 from Jammy to Focal
On Tuesday, April 19 2022, Fantu wrote:
> done a fast rebuild of rdeps in another ppa:
> https://launchpad.net/~fantonifabio/+archive/ubuntu/freeipmi-backports
> all uploaded after freeipmi build was published in the ppa
Thanks, Fabio.
I've just uploaded the package to focal-backports. It's no
On Tuesday, April 19 2022, Fantu wrote:
> Hi, thanks for reply, 1.6.9-2~bpo10+1~bpo20.04.1 was a mistake and some days
> ago I fixed removing ~bpo10+1, where you still view
> 1.6.9-2~bpo10+1~bpo20.04.1?
> When I'll have time I'll try to do rdeps build in a ppa
Hey Fabio,
Thanks. I was reviewi
Ah, there's actually something else: as Andreas mentioned before, one of
the things we have to check is whether the reverse-depends of the
package will build fine with the new version. I looked at your
backports PPA linked above but couldn't find the rdeps there.
Here's the list:
$ reverse-depen
Thanks for the bug report, Fabio.
I reviewed the branch where you put the backport patch and it seems
mostly good to me. The only comment I have is about the version string
you chose:
1.6.9-2~bpo10+1~bpo20.04.1
I understand that this is probably because you based your work on top of
the backpor
On Tuesday, March 08 2022, Dan Streetman wrote:
>> (By the way, any idea whether y'all might put up a ubuntu debuginfod
>> server, like debian (via sergiodj), fedora, and others have? It makes
>> systemtap and other debugging type tools much easier to use.)
>
> Yes, I'd be quite interested as wel
15 matches
Mail list logo
