haskell-stm package: invalid (as I've just found out how to request
backports nowadays... sorry for getting it wrong in the first place, and
I hope that's better now).
** Changed in: haskell-stm (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
please backport haskell-stm to hardy
https://bugs.launchpad
Package in dapper-updates now.
** Changed in: Ubuntu Dapper
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
DosEMU compiled without X support
https://launchpad.net/bugs/53996
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubun
Hi,
yes, this should be a SRU, however please follow
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/SRU. In particular I'd like to see a
debdiff relative to the dapper and edgy source package and the
description updated with what's actually the cause of the error and how
it is resolved with an upgrade.
Thanks,
-> unassigning motu-sru. Please *subscribe* us, once you've got a
debdiff to review. Otherwise it won't show up in our worklist.
Thanks,
Stefan.
** Changed in: suphp (Ubuntu)
Assignee: MOTU Stable Release Updates => (unassigned)
--
suphp 0.6.2 backport request to dapper (0.6.1) and ed
Unsubscribing motu-sru and subscribing MOTU instead.
Please follow https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/SRU and (re)subscribe motu-
sru, once there is a debdiff to review, thanks.
--
Installation fails if no DBMS is available
https://launchpad.net/bugs/65933
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-bac
Hi,
sorry for the extreme delay. Finally there is a fixed package in the
dapper-proposed archive, which needs to be tested. It would be great, if
you could help testing and leave a comment on bug #72951 if the package
solves the problems (or also if it doesn't work for you).
Thanks,
Stefan.
-
Hi,
After quickly looking through the changes between 2.6.11 and 2.6.14,
these are imo good to go as is for an SRU. Now only someone needs to
supply a debdiff and take care for the SRU.
Unsubscribing motu-sru in the meantime. Once someone will take care and
provides the necessary info, please res
Hi,
unsubscribing motu-sru again: the motu-sru team will only approve/reject
requests, not handle them. Please resubscribe as soon as someone will
take care for this and provides a debdiff to review.
Thanks,
Stefan.
--
missing dependence on libsys-hostname-long-perl
https://launchpad.net/b
Ok, reassigning to backports.
** Changed in: dosemu-freedos (Ubuntu)
Assignee: MOTU Stable Release Updates => Ubuntu Backporters
** Summary changed:
- [SRU] dosemu-freedos (dapper and most probably edgy)
+ dosemu-freedos (dapper and most probably edgy)
--
dosemu-freedos (dapper and most p
Public bug reported:
dosemu-freedos in dapper and edgy cause a segfault in dosemu.
** Affects: dosemu-freedos (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Ubuntu Backporters
Status: Unconfirmed
--
[SRU] dosemu-freedos (dapper and most probably edgy)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/730
** Changed in: Ubuntu Dapper
Status: Unconfirmed => In Progress
--
DosEMU compiled without X support
https://launchpad.net/bugs/53996
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-ba
sorry for the long time this bug is present...
@John: I meant to bring this into dapper-updates anyway
The problem is, that we still don't have a StableReleaseUpdate-Policy
for universe, but I hope that will be discussed in the next few weeks
now.
Cheers,
Stefan.
--
DosEMU compiled without X
Hi,
I'm rejecting this bug now, since I don't see a way how to backport gch6
without breaking the library packages.
Feel free to reopen if you have a good suggestion how to do it.
Cheers,
Stefan.
** Changed in: ghc6 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => StefanPotyra
Hi,
backporting ghc6 is a major problem due to the nature of the generated
libraries (especially the debian build system): Since it's not
guaranteed that different versions of ghc6 will produce binary
compatible libraries (also this might be the case for 6.4.2/6.4.1), the
debian haskell policy for
14 matches
Mail list logo
