[Bug 121163] Re: Support for Nvidia GeForce 8400M, 8300, 8600 Gfx chipset

2014-04-10 Thread Timothy R. Chavez
The bug task for the somerville project has been removed by an automated script. This bug has been cloned on that project and is available here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1305718 ** No longer affects: somerville -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 121163] Re: Support for Nvidia GeForce 8400M, 8300, 8600 Gfx chipset

2014-04-09 Thread Timothy R. Chavez
** Changed in: somerville Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: somerville Status: New = Fix Released ** No longer affects: dell -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to Feisty Backports.

[Bug 1171213] Re: Please backport lilypond 2.16.0-1~exp+2 (universe) from raring

2013-04-29 Thread Timothy Gu
-- See https://launchpad.net/~timothy-gu/+archive/test * quantal: [X] Package builds without modification [X] lilypond-doc-html-ja installs cleanly and runs [X] lilypond-doc-pdf-es installs cleanly and runs [X] lilypond-doc installs cleanly and runs [X] lilypond-doc-html installs

[Bug 1171213] Re: Please backport lilypond 2.16.0-1~exp+2 (universe) from raring

2013-04-29 Thread Timothy Gu
Bugs fixed in 2.14.3: https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=1q=label%3AFixed_2_14_3colspec=ID+Type+Status+Stars+Owner+Patch+Needs+Summaryx=typecells=tiles Bugs fixed in 2.16.0:

[Bug 1171213] [NEW] Please backport lilypond 2.16.0-1~exp+2 (universe) from raring

2013-04-21 Thread Timothy Gu
Public bug reported: Please backport lilypond 2.16.0-1~exp+2 (universe) from raring to quantal. Reason for the backport: The new lilypond package has many new features than the current release in quantal, and is stable enough. Testing: Mark off items in the

[Bug 71546] Re: (feisty)No icon for brasero

2006-11-29 Thread Timothy
zenrox does the 0.5.1 version build with the icon included as well? I know the current version in edgy is icon-less in the applications menu. -- (feisty)No icon for brasero https://launchpad.net/bugs/71546 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or

[Bug 63452] Re: Please backport brasero CD burning tool from Ubuntu Edgy

2006-11-19 Thread Timothy
John Dong brasero from edgy is not in any of the dapper repos. so i'm not sure where that info is coming from. As for the 0.5.x version I have not tried to backport that,and it would seem that those who have tried say it needs a certain file. -- Please backport brasero CD burning tool from

[Bug 63452] Re: Please backport brasero CD burning tool from Ubuntu Edgy

2006-11-18 Thread Timothy
I was able to back port this program from edgy to dapper 64 with out issue. I posted before that it worked,and the bug was rejected. -- Please backport brasero CD burning tool from Ubuntu Edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/63452 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 54960] Re: rkhunter 1.2.8

2006-11-16 Thread Timothy
rkhunter 1.2.8 backports from edgy,and installs with out issues on dapper 64. -- rkhunter 1.2.8 https://launchpad.net/bugs/54960 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

[Bug 71546] Re: (feisty)No icon for brasero

2006-11-16 Thread Timothy
Note: the icon is shown in the menu under dapper. ** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream) Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed -- (feisty)No icon for brasero https://launchpad.net/bugs/71546 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe

[Bug 71546] Re: (feisty)No icon for brasero

2006-11-16 Thread Timothy
Brasero 0.4.4 backports from edgy,and installs with out issue on dapper 64. -- (feisty)No icon for brasero https://launchpad.net/bugs/71546 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

[Bug 53814] Re: gnome-xchat

2006-11-16 Thread Timothy
Edgy xchat-gnome won't backport atleast for me under dapper 64. If anyone else wants to take a shot at it feel free. -- gnome-xchat https://launchpad.net/bugs/53814 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

[Bug 55384] Re: Please backport democracy from edgy

2006-11-16 Thread Timothy
Was unable to back port from edgy to dapper on a 64bit install. -- Please backport democracy from edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/55384 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

[Bug 60417] Re: wireshark

2006-11-16 Thread Timothy
wireshark would not backport from edgy to dapper on a 64bit install. -- wireshark https://launchpad.net/bugs/60417 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

[Bug 57133] Re: [Backport] Glade3

2006-11-16 Thread Timothy
Glade-3 would not backport for me from edgy to dapper 64. -- [Backport] Glade3 https://launchpad.net/bugs/57133 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

[Bug 60093] Re: Please, backport amule 2.1.2-3

2006-11-16 Thread Timothy
amule 2.1.3 backports from edgy to dapper 64,and installs with out issue. ** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream) Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed -- Please, backport amule 2.1.2-3 https://launchpad.net/bugs/60093 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 53580] Re: [backport] kmymoney2-0.8.4

2006-11-16 Thread Timothy
Backports from edgy to dapper 64 with no issues. ** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream) Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed -- [backport] kmymoney2-0.8.4 https://launchpad.net/bugs/53580 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe

Re: [Bug 59096] Re: Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported

2006-11-08 Thread Timothy
John Dong under edgy 64 this is the lib it depends on libc6-i386. Which is what me believe that the back ported 32bit version should install under 64bit dapper. it was just a guess. You coders would know more on this then I. On 11/8/06, John Dong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone with a 64-bit

Re: [Bug 59096] Re: Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported

2006-11-08 Thread Timothy
Wow I'm right. dang that's a complement coming from you John Dong. well I got dapper 64 installed will see if i can get eagle backported,and report any findings. On 11/8/06, John Dong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're right, upon examination the 64-bit package is just a wrapper around the 32-bit

Re: [Bug 59096] Re: Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported

2006-11-08 Thread Timothy
John Dong with the use of prevu eagle 4.16 back ported,and runs successfully on dapper 64. If you want I can attach the 64bit deb files. On 11/8/06, SD Plissken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wow I'm right. dang that's a complement coming from you John Dong. well I got dapper 64 installed will see if

Re: [Bug 59096] Re: Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported

2006-11-08 Thread Timothy
Ok On 11/8/06, John Dong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll take your word for it! Thanks. +1 from me, too, then. -- Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported https://launchpad.net/bugs/59096 -- Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported https://launchpad.net/bugs/59096 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list