the new 0.11.0 release b/i/r fine with prevu
--
Backport of rhythmbox 0.10.90
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116709
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports
rhythmbox 0.11.0 has been released. I'm building ti right now, so i
cannot say b/r/i yet, though, it looks good, and as the 0.10.90 release
is almost identical, i wouldn't expect any breakage. will update
shortly.
--
Backport of rhythmbox 0.10.90
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116709
You receive
--
Matt Nicholson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/28/07, Mahdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I guess it should be backported as fast as possible.
> Feisty is a final (stable) release, and the amount of beta packages on it
> should be minimized. And since gaim is no longer "mantain
Public bug reported:
a whole bunch of nice updates, including nicer icons and some UI
improvements. b/i/r just fine from prevu for me
** Affects: feisty-backports (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Backport of rhythmbox 0.10.90
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
after successfully backporting evolution-data-server (see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/feisty-backports/+bug/114031), pidgin built
without a hitch in prevu, and is running without a problem on my
workstation right now. it even provides a gaim meta/transition package
to help the upgrade path.
b/i/r +
Public bug reported:
or rather, evolution-data-server (1.11.1-0ubuntu2) (which generates the
package), is needed to successfully backport pidgin.
b/i/r just fine from prevu, and am running it now on my feisty box,
without issues (using evolution without any problems)
** Affects: feisty-backport
Just tried in prevu now that pidgin hit the repos, fails with:
-> Considering build-dep libebook1.2-dev
-> Trying libebook1.2-dev
-> Cannot install libebook1.2-dev; apt errors follow:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some pa
+1, b/i/r in prevu fine.
--
f-spot 0.30
https://launchpad.net/bugs/75390
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
I've been using this, along with a prevu'd rhythmbox 0.9.7 with no
issues for 5 days now. The new features of rhythmbox are, in my opinion,
worth it. This is the only thing holding rhythmbox back from being
backported.
** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream)
Status: Rejected => Unconfirmed
Public bug reported:
needed for the upcomming (this weekend?) release of rhythmbox 0.9.7
** Affects: edgy-backports (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
libgpod 0.4.0
https://launchpad.net/bugs/75761
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubun
b/i/"r" from prevu fine. resulting debs:
libgpod0_0.4.0-0ubuntu3~6.10prevu1_i386.deb
libgpod-common_0.4.0-0ubuntu3~6.10prevu1_all.deb
libgpod-dev_0.4.0-0ubuntu3~6.10prevu1_i386.deb
--
libgpod 0.4.0
https://launchpad.net/bugs/75761
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.
Okay, forget all about those build errors. I had been playing around
with some evn variable to run some paralell make commands and ran into
something similar while building the rhythmbox release canidate. i think
one process was looking for something the other hadn't finished yet. as
soon as i reve
oh, i had previously backported cli-common-dev to build beagle, after
doing so, the above error/build breakage occurs (looks like in taglib-
sharp)
--
banshee 0.11.3
https://launchpad.net/bugs/75482
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscrib
Public bug reported:
theres a good amount of fixes, including a major speed up when switching
sources.
** Affects: edgy-backports (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
banshee 0.11.3
https://launchpad.net/bugs/75482
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backp
Compiles from source fine on my edgy desktop (no major
modifications/changes), however, in prevu it fails with:
Making all in taglib-sharp
make[3]: Entering directory
`/var/cache/prevu/src/5206/banshee-0.11.3+dfsg/taglib-sharp'
/usr/bin/gmcs -debug -nowarn:0278 -target:library -out:TagLib.dll -r:
+1 builds fine in prevu. runs fine as well.
--
request cairo-clock
https://launchpad.net/bugs/73801
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
ling/typo's you can contribute to my dislocated thumb.
matt nicholson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sjoeboo.com
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
built fine and seems to work fine.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
never mind, i just built it with the script and both packages,
totem-xine and totem-gstreamer were built, along with firefox plugins
etc. about to start testing.
On Dec 12, 2005, at 1:52 PM, matt nicholson wrote:
was looking into backporting it. defaults to xine backend. should 2
versions be
was looking into backporting it. defaults to xine backend. should 2
versions be built with xine/gstreamer enabled? what would the easiest
way to do that be (other than a completely manual ./configure, compile,
and package build).
thanks.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@list
backported fine and runs fine for me.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
was a forum request. built just fine and is running just fine for me.
--
matt nicholson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sjoeboo.com
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
were requested in forums.
both backported just fine for me.
nmap 3.93
nessus 2.2.5
matt nicholson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sjoeboo.com
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
was requested in the forums, i just backported it fine.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
ah ha, okay then, thanks.
On Nov 30, 2005, at 2:20 PM, John Dong wrote:
imagemagick cannot be backported, because of its wide use on the system (even php uses imagemagick).
On 11/30/05, matt nicholson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:just backported them and installed, everything was fine. duri
libmagick9-dev_6.2.4.5-0.3ubuntu1_i386.deb
libmagick9_6.2.4.5-0.3ubuntu1_i386.deb
perlmagick_6.2.4.5-0.3ubuntu1_i386.deb
libmagick++9c2a_6.2.4.5-0.3ubuntu1_i386.deb
tango-icon-theme_0.5.0-0ubuntu1_all.deb
all installed just fine and seem to have 0 issues.
---
matt nicholson
[EMAIL PROTECTED
alright then, that makes it even simpler, thanks. what about the procedure for after the package is built? just notify someone "official" that it builds fine or what? thanks again John, you've been pretty quick and helpfully.
matt nicholson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sjoeboo.com
On Nov 30,
e once the build
completes and everything works fine? just notify the list to have
someone "official" build it or what?
thanks for the help again.
matt nicholson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sjoeboo.com
On Nov 30, 2005, at 10:00 AM, matthew nicholson wrote:
excelent, exactly what i nee
odd, cause i got the newest libgpod and rhythmbox to build just perfect
last night about 30 minutes after it was released, and ran into no
issues with updating dbus etc.
On Nov 29, 2005, at 11:54 AM, Mike Basinger wrote:
It look like libgpod is dependent on libdbus-1-1 (>= 0.50) and
libdbu
yay
On Nov 9, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 03:08:00PM -0500, John Dong wrote:
idn, matt, it's been 11 ;)
And it exists on the master archive; it'll take a little while to
propagate
to the mirrors. At any rate, it's open for business.
--
- mdz
--
ubuntu
now, i know UBZ is going on. and i know this question has been asked a
few times already, least i would imagine it has been. so, in advance,
i'm sorry if they don't want to hear this again. i do not aim to make
people pissed, i'm just curious.
when/will breezy backports open?
i'm not asking a
31 matches
Mail list logo
