** Changed in: precise-backports
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Precise Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1002780
Title:
Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2ubuntu1 (main) from quanta
2.8 is such a huge step forward compared to 2.6 and since it seems to
run fine from http://ppa.launchpad.net/otto-kesselgulasch/gimp/ubuntu, i
wonder why 2.8 is still not ported back.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Prec
Hopefully "Click-packages" will help resolve this issue with outdated
apps in the future.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Precise Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1002780
Title:
Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2u
I'd suggest installing it from a PPA.
I've been using this one for several months without any problems:
http://ppa.launchpad.net/otto-kesselgulasch/gimp/ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Precise Backports.
https://
Any news on this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Precise Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1002780
Title:
Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2ubuntu1 (main) from quantal
To manage notifications about this bug go to
Forgot to attach the extremetuxracer diff.
** Patch added: "extremetuxracer-gimp2.8-fixes.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/precise-backports/+bug/1002780/+attachment/3205272/+files/extremetuxracer-gimp2.8-fixes.debdiff
** Description changed:
Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2ubuntu1 (main) f
extremetuxracer-gimp-dev (0.4-4) needs a minor patch to fix directory
selection in the 'Load Level' script-fu script. Seems like the etracer
gimp code has been discarded upstream, otherwise I'd file a bug there.
Otherwise the remaining two scripts work correctly besides a warning
about the "invalid
** Description changed:
Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2ubuntu1 (main) from quantal to precise.
Reason for the backport:
Further to my previous request, which I didn't file as a bug report because I
didn't know the procedure.
GIMP 2.8 has been many years in the m
** Description changed:
Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2ubuntu1 (main) from quantal to precise.
Reason for the backport:
Further to my previous request, which I didn't file as a bug report because I
didn't know the procedure.
GIMP 2.8 has been many years in the m
gimp-dimage-color (1.1.0-3ubuntu1) fails to rebuild with gimp 2.8
without the attached header changes, but otherwise installs and runs
fine.
** Patch added: "gimp-dimage-color-gimp2.8-fixes.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/precise-backports/+bug/1002780/+attachment/3188164/+files/gimp-dimag
** Description changed:
Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2ubuntu1 (main) from quantal to precise.
Reason for the backport:
Further to my previous request, which I didn't file as a bug report because I
didn't know the procedure.
GIMP 2.8 has been many years in the m
** Description changed:
Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2ubuntu1 (main) from quantal to precise.
Reason for the backport:
Further to my previous request, which I didn't file as a bug report because I
didn't know the procedure.
GIMP 2.8 has been many years in the m
** Description changed:
Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2ubuntu1 (main) from quantal to precise.
Reason for the backport:
Further to my previous request, which I didn't file as a bug report because I
didn't know the procedure.
GIMP 2.8 has been many years in the m
** Description changed:
Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2ubuntu1 (main) from quantal to precise.
Reason for the backport:
Further to my previous request, which I didn't file as a bug report because I
didn't know the procedure.
GIMP 2.8 has been many years in the m
** Description changed:
Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2ubuntu1 (main) from quantal to precise.
Reason for the backport:
Further to my previous request, which I didn't file as a bug report because I
didn't know the procedure.
GIMP 2.8 has been many years in the m
gimp-gap (2.6.0+dfsg-2) fails to rebuild in precise against gimp2.8. The
changes required are minor, just updated headers, and it is fixed in
(2.6.0+dfsg-3) in quantal. Otherwise the package installs and runs fine
(at least, I could walk through the tutorial and render a simple video,
it has a ton
** Description changed:
Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2ubuntu1 (main) from quantal to precise.
Reason for the backport:
Further to my previous request, which I didn't file as a bug report because I
didn't know the procedure.
GIMP 2.8 has been many years in the m
** Description changed:
Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2ubuntu1 (main) from quantal to precise.
Reason for the backport:
Further to my previous request, which I didn't file as a bug report because I
didn't know the procedure.
GIMP 2.8 has been many years in the m
** Description changed:
Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2ubuntu1 (main) from quantal to precise.
Reason for the backport:
Further to my previous request, which I didn't file as a bug report because I
didn't know the procedure.
GIMP 2.8 has been many years in the m
gimp-texturize (2.1-1) installs and runs fine, but requires the attached
small patch to rebuild with gimp 2.8.
gimp-normalmap (1.2.2-0ubuntu2) on the other hand, installs and rebuilds
fine, but only partially works. Clicking the 3d Preview button causes a
segfault at preview3d.c line 1846. It seem
** Description changed:
Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2ubuntu1 (main) from quantal to precise.
Reason for the backport:
Further to my previous request, which I didn't file as a bug report because I
didn't know the procedure.
GIMP 2.8 has been many years in the m
@Iain: Thanks for the answers. Attaching the diff, although it might not
matter. When attempting to install and test the new package, it fails
because gimp breaks on gimp-plugins-registry (<< 4.20120506). Quantal
has 5.20120523 but it failed to build because it contains references to
g_thread_init.
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 07:06:49PM -, Jason Conti wrote:
> gimp-plugin-registry (3.5.4-1) fails to rebuild without the following
> changes:
>
> safe-for-web/gimp-save-for-web-0.29.0/src/webx_dialog.h:
> change to (no
> longer allowed to including individual widget headers)
>
> xmc/Makefile
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 06:10:37PM -, Jason Conti wrote:
> Should we give more detailed comments about what we are testing, or can
> we just start ticking off boxes? (For instance, gimp-dds surprisingly
> works just fine, and also rebuilds fine) And for the rebuild testing,
> are local rebuilds
gimp-plugin-registry (3.5.4-1) fails to rebuild without the following
changes:
safe-for-web/gimp-save-for-web-0.29.0/src/webx_dialog.h:
change to (no
longer allowed to including individual widget headers)
xmc/Makefile:
Hardcoded to fail if libgimp2.0-dev version is greater than 2.7~ but seems
Should we give more detailed comments about what we are testing, or can
we just start ticking off boxes? (For instance, gimp-dds surprisingly
works just fine, and also rebuilds fine) And for the rebuild testing,
are local rebuilds acceptable or should I test build them in my ppa with
the other back
** Description changed:
Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2ubuntu1 (main) from quantal to precise.
Reason for the backport:
Further to my previous request, which I didn't file as a bug report because I
didn't know the procedure.
GIMP 2.8 has been many years in the m
** Description changed:
Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2ubuntu1 (main) from quantal to precise.
Reason for the backport:
Further to my previous request, which I didn't file as a bug report because I
didn't know the procedure.
GIMP 2.8 has been many years in the m
It does. I just filed bug #1006424 and bug #1006426 for the two
libraries which will need to be backported first.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Precise Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1002780
Title:
Yup, I can confirm that GIMP 2.8 installs and runs great! Did it build
without modification? Need to know that for the checkbox thing.
** Description changed:
Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2ubuntu1 (main) from quantal to precise.
Reason for the backport:
Further t
I think this backport might also get hit by bug #888665 :(
Backporting babl and gegl wouldn't be a problem, because they are pretty
self contained (only gimp and gnome-scan would need to be tested). But
our build system wouldn't be able to build gimp against the new
libraries, due to this bug. Ho
Great! I've just installed Gimp 2.8 from laney's PPA
https://launchpad.net/~laney/+archive/ppa
It installs and and runs perfectly so far. I'm happy to help with some of the
dependency testing when I have more time later in the week :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
Like I said, though, I'm very happy to test it once you manage to get it
building!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Precise Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1002780
Title:
Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2ubu
Did you upload it to this ppa instead:
https://launchpad.net/~laney/+archive/ppa ??
Or do things from there just automatically move to the other if they work?
Anyway, this didn't build :(
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registr
Hi there,
I just uploaded a no-change backport to
https://launchpad.net/~laney/+archive/backports-testing
for you. If it builds, you can get the packages from there to test.
There are, however, quite a lot of reverse dependencies that need
testing so it would be good if those of you who want t
Oh, sorry, I don't really have the necessary technical acumen to get the
builds going; I'm happy to test them once they're up though
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Precise Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
36 matches
Mail list logo
