The Precise Pangolin has reached end of life, so this bug will not be
fixed for that release
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Precise Backport
Thanks, Felix.
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387
Title:
openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubun
> If someone with the appropriate permissions can set this back to
Confirmed in Precise, that would be appreciated.
Done.
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which
Since I don’t have the ability to unmark this as fixed in Precise (which
it is not), as opposed to Precise Backports (which it is), I’m reopening
it in Ubuntu. Users are still running into this problem because most
users do not have backports enabled. For example, bug 1325352 was just
filed today.
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: Rafael David Tinoco (inaddy) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387
Title:
openafs-modules-dkms 1
This is fixed in precise-backports, not precise. Can you please unmark
this as fixed in precise, if nothing else so that affected users can
find this report?
** Also affects: precise-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: precise-backports
Status: New => Fix R
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387
Title:
openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2:
Sorry, the correct LP number is LP #1324288.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387
Title:
openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module FTBFS on 3.8.0
To manage noti
Backport accepted on -backports (LP #1274324).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387
Title:
openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module FTBFS on 3.8.0
To manage no
Micheal,
I have fulfilled the -backports request as guidelines request on public
bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/precise-backports/+bug/1324288
Awaiting for ubuntu-backporters to respond.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed
I was able to install the openafs 1.6.7-1~precise1 packages from the
provided PPA and they installed and built modules via DKMS with the HWE
linux-generic-lts-saucy kernel on a 12.04 system.
Currently we can use these packages in a separate repo we add to systems
during install time and doing apt-
: openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module FTBFS
on 3.8.0
After this discussion (and some other customers/users requests on the
same bug), knowing that the 1.6.5 backport was not eligible for a SRU
(just like Steve pointed out) I started to cherry-pick code from openafs
1.6.5 to openafs 1.6.1, so
openafs_1.6.7-1~precise1.debian.tar.xz
** Attachment added: "openafs_1.6.7-1~precise1.debian.tar.xz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/1206387/+attachment/4121051/+files/openafs_1.6.7-1%7Eprecise1.debian.tar.xz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
openafs_1.6.7-1~precise1_source.changes
** Attachment added: "openafs_1.6.7-1~precise1_source.changes"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/1206387/+attachment/4121053/+files/openafs_1.6.7-1%7Eprecise1_source.changes
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
Of course Anders. You're absolutely right, my fault.
I've updated package version and fixed ppa repository.
I'm also attaching new package source.
Thanks!
PS: Functional tests still needed.
** Attachment added: "openafs_1.6.7-1~precise1.dsc"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Rafael David Tinoco (inaddy) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387
Title:
openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+u
** Attachment removed: "openafs_1.6.7-1ubuntu1.dsc"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/1206387/+attachment/4120568/+files/openafs_1.6.7-1ubuntu1.dsc
** Attachment removed: "openafs_1.6.7-1ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/1206
(Er, I meant ~ubuntu10.04.1, of course.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387
Title:
openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module FTBFS on 3.8.0
To manage notifica
The version number is too high. Packages in -backports need to have a
smaller version number than the releases they were backported from;
otherwise release upgrades will not work as expected. Usually this is
accomplished with a decreasing ‘~’, as in 1.6.7-1~precise1 or
1.6.7-1~ubuntu8.04.1.
--
Yo
Thank you very much Rafael. I'll test the packages from the PPA today on
our HWE installs and provide any feedback we may have.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387
Tit
20 matches
Mail list logo
