[Bug 2030675] Re: [BPO] plastimatch/1.9.4+dfsg.1-2 for jammy (22.04LTS)

2023-10-07 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for plastimatch (Ubuntu Jammy) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: plastimatch (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. htt

[Bug 2030675] Re: [BPO] plastimatch/1.9.4+dfsg.1-2 for jammy (22.04LTS)

2023-08-08 Thread Thomas Ward
Changing the package to include two *external* sources is not proper, because you will have packaging conflicts. If this bug is relevant to other packages, then cherrypicking the patch from upstream and following the Stable Release Updates process for fixing/updating libinsighttoolkit5 is where yo

[Bug 2030675] Re: [BPO] plastimatch/1.9.4+dfsg.1-2 for jammy (22.04LTS)

2023-08-08 Thread Greg Sharp
Thanks @teward. I'm sorry I filed the bug incorrectly. My testing indicates that the 1.9.4+dfsg.1-2 source package fails to build because of a bug in libinsighttoolkit5-dev. It is missing two header files. Other than that it seems to build fine. Would it be best to backport or patch libinsight

[Bug 2030675] Re: [BPO] plastimatch/1.9.4+dfsg.1-2 for jammy (22.04LTS)

2023-08-07 Thread Thomas Ward
As a backporter *and* a Developer, I have some major concerns about this request. (1) This has no developer backing. One of the major things about a Backport is it needs a developer or sponsor willing to push this through. I don't see any tied to this request. (2) This request does **not** have

[Bug 2030675] Re: [BPO] plastimatch/1.9.4+dfsg.1-2 for jammy (22.04LTS)

2023-08-07 Thread Thomas Ward
@GregSharp It's invalid against the Development release, Mantic. We added the series target for Jammy which is what you requested the target OS to be. "Invalid" for a bare package bug is against the devel release, not for the entire request, because we track that by series tasks/targets. -- You

[Bug 2030675] Re: [BPO] plastimatch/1.9.4+dfsg.1-2 for jammy (22.04LTS)

2023-08-07 Thread Greg Sharp
Why is this invalid? Since Google colab updated to 22.04, users have found they can no longer install plastimatch on that platform. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2030675

[Bug 2030675] Re: [BPO] plastimatch/1.9.4+dfsg.1-2 for jammy (22.04LTS)

2023-08-07 Thread Thomas Ward
** Also affects: plastimatch (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: plastimatch (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.laun