Is this the same as bug #48963? I think they both want that OpenOffice
gets backported.
--
Req: OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.0.3 for Dapper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/48963
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Sorry, meant #51631 :-). Why is there no edit function in Launchad.
--
Req: OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.0.3 for Dapper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/48963
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
** Description changed:
- OOo 2.0.3 has just been release with a couple of major bug fixes,
- especially for office environments. The biggest one of all (IMHO) is
- that we can now print labels and hide the blank lines!!! This was been
- a bug in versions 2.0.0 to 2.0.2. Related there is also
I think that this would be too large a change for a backport.
--
Req: OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.0.3 for Dapper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/48963
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
@Bruce: Why would be this a too-big of a change for a backport?
That's the point of having backports right? Backports being able to
included stuff which wouldn't be included in mainline. Including large
changes...
--
Req: OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.0.3 for Dapper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/48963
New request as Edgy finally has 2.0.3 packages:
https://launchpad.net/products/dapper-backports/+bug/54228
--
Req: OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.0.3 for Dapper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/48963
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
