[Bug 551655] Re: open-whois.org is cybersquatted and its rules should be removed from Spamassassin

2010-12-11 Thread Andy Brody
That did the trick. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551655 Title: open-whois.org is cybersquatted and its rules should be removed from Spamassassin

[Bug 551655] Re: open-whois.org is cybersquatted and its rules should be removed from Spamassassin

2010-12-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package spamassassin - 3.2.4-1ubuntu1.3 --- spamassassin (3.2.4-1ubuntu1.3) hardy-proposed; urgency=low * 70_remove_open-whois.org.dpatch: Remove open-whois.org (LP: #551655) -- Clint ByrumThu, 02 Dec 2010 00:21:30 -0800 ** Changed in: spamassassin (U

[Bug 551655] Re: open-whois.org is cybersquatted and its rules should be removed from Spamassassin

2010-12-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551655 Title: open-whois.org is cybersquatted and its r

[Bug 551655] Re: open-whois.org is cybersquatted and its rules should be removed from Spamassassin

2010-12-06 Thread Imre Gergely
Right. I was trying something like this, but my test messages did not trigger the OPENWHOIS test... With your TEST CASE I can confirm that the package from -proposed is working and it does NOT include the OPENWHOIS test. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Ba

[Bug 551655] Re: open-whois.org is cybersquatted and its rules should be removed from Spamassassin

2010-12-06 Thread Clint Byrum
Imre, once again thanks for your work verifying these bug fixes. TEST CASE: zcat /usr/share/doc/spamassassin/examples/sample-nonspam.txt.gz > sample-nonspam.txt spamassassin -t < sample-nonspam.txt | grep OPENWHOIS Since OPENWHOIS does not exist, we should never get a positive, but we do. So yo

[Bug 551655] Re: open-whois.org is cybersquatted and its rules should be removed from Spamassassin

2010-12-05 Thread Imre Gergely
I'm trying to recreate the "bug" but I can't seem to get it right... Is there a sure way to get SA to show that test in the header? I'm sending all kinds of messages to my test box, but it doesn't want to do the OPENWHOIS test... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Bug 551655] Re: open-whois.org is cybersquatted and its rules should be removed from Spamassassin

2010-12-03 Thread Martin Pitt
Accepted spamassassin into hardy-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: spamassassin (Ubuntu

[Bug 551655] Re: open-whois.org is cybersquatted and its rules should be removed from Spamassassin

2010-12-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551655 Title: open-whois.org is cybersquatted and

[Bug 551655] Re: open-whois.org is cybersquatted and its rules should be removed from Spamassassin

2010-12-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
I've uploaded the proposed fix for both hardy and hardy-backports. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551655 Title: open-whois.org is cybersquatted and its rule

Re: [Bug 551655] Re: open-whois.org is cybersquatted and its rules should be removed from Spamassassin

2010-12-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
The bug could use a good test case. Please edit the main bug, start with TEST CASE: and then describe how to show the problem exists before the upgrade and how it's gone after (think small test procedure). ** Also affects: hardy-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed