[Bug 59096] Re: Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported

2006-11-14 Thread Colin Watson
* Trying to backport eagle... - - - I: Extracting eagle_4.16-2.dsc ... done. I: Building backport of eagle-4.16 ... done. ** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported https://launchpad.net/bugs/59096 -- ubun

[Bug 59096] Re: Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported

2006-11-08 Thread John Dong
This package is approved for backporting. ** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported https://launchpad.net/bugs/59096 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/li

Re: [Bug 59096] Re: Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported

2006-11-08 Thread Timothy
Ok On 11/8/06, John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll take your word for it! > > Thanks. > > +1 from me, too, then. > > -- > Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported > https://launchpad.net/bugs/59096 > -- Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported https://launchpad.net/bugs/59096 -- ubuntu-backports mailing l

[Bug 59096] Re: Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported

2006-11-08 Thread John Dong
I'll take your word for it! Thanks. +1 from me, too, then. -- Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported https://launchpad.net/bugs/59096 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

Re: [Bug 59096] Re: Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported

2006-11-08 Thread Timothy
John Dong with the use of prevu eagle 4.16 back ported,and runs successfully on dapper 64. If you want I can attach the 64bit deb files. On 11/8/06, SD Plissken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wow I'm right. dang that's a complement coming from you John Dong. > well I got dapper 64 installed will see

Re: [Bug 59096] Re: Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported

2006-11-08 Thread Timothy
Wow I'm right. dang that's a complement coming from you John Dong. well I got dapper 64 installed will see if i can get eagle backported,and report any findings. On 11/8/06, John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You're right, upon examination the 64-bit package is just a wrapper > around the 32-b

[Bug 59096] Re: Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported

2006-11-08 Thread John Dong
You're right, upon examination the 64-bit package is just a wrapper around the 32-bit package. Though I'd still like for someone with amd64 to build this in prevu and see if it works. -- Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported https://launchpad.net/bugs/59096 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-bac

Re: [Bug 59096] Re: Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported

2006-11-08 Thread Timothy
John Dong under edgy 64 this is the lib it depends on libc6-i386. Which is what me believe that the back ported 32bit version should install under 64bit dapper. it was just a guess. You coders would know more on this then I. On 11/8/06, John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Someone with a 64-bit

[Bug 59096] Re: Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported

2006-11-08 Thread John Dong
Someone with a 64-bit box should test building it though -- Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported https://launchpad.net/bugs/59096 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

Re: [Bug 59096] Re: Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported

2006-11-08 Thread Timothy
Thanks zenrox. from my findings it should would on the 64bit version with 32bit libs installed,however. I have not fully tested this theory . On 11/8/06, zenrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > compiles in prevu for the 32bit > but i dont know what to test > but it installs fine as well > > ** Change

[Bug 59096] Re: Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported

2006-11-08 Thread zenrox
compiles in prevu for the 32bit but i dont know what to test but it installs fine as well ** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream) Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed -- Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported https://launchpad.net/bugs/59096 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@list