* Trying to backport eagle...
-
-
-
I: Extracting eagle_4.16-2.dsc ... done.
I: Building backport of eagle-4.16 ... done.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59096
--
ubun
This package is approved for backporting.
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59096
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/li
Ok
On 11/8/06, John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll take your word for it!
>
> Thanks.
>
> +1 from me, too, then.
>
> --
> Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/59096
>
--
Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59096
--
ubuntu-backports mailing l
I'll take your word for it!
Thanks.
+1 from me, too, then.
--
Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59096
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
John Dong with the use of prevu eagle 4.16 back ported,and runs
successfully on dapper 64. If you want I can attach the 64bit deb
files.
On 11/8/06, SD Plissken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow I'm right. dang that's a complement coming from you John Dong.
> well I got dapper 64 installed will see
Wow I'm right. dang that's a complement coming from you John Dong.
well I got dapper 64 installed will see if i can get eagle
backported,and report any findings.
On 11/8/06, John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're right, upon examination the 64-bit package is just a wrapper
> around the 32-b
You're right, upon examination the 64-bit package is just a wrapper
around the 32-bit package.
Though I'd still like for someone with amd64 to build this in prevu and
see if it works.
--
Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59096
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-bac
John Dong under edgy 64 this is the lib it depends on libc6-i386.
Which is what me believe that the back ported 32bit version should
install under 64bit dapper. it was just a guess. You coders would
know more on this then I.
On 11/8/06, John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Someone with a 64-bit
Someone with a 64-bit box should test building it though
--
Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59096
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Thanks zenrox. from my findings it should would on the 64bit version
with 32bit libs installed,however. I have not fully tested this theory
.
On 11/8/06, zenrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> compiles in prevu for the 32bit
> but i dont know what to test
> but it installs fine as well
>
> ** Change
compiles in prevu for the 32bit
but i dont know what to test
but it installs fine as well
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
Can eagle 4.16-2 be backported
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59096
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@list
11 matches
Mail list logo