[Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2008-05-16 Thread Yuriy Kozlov
Closing the bug since the only possible backport (Dapper) is already marked Invalid. ** Changed in: kdesvn (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/71056 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2008-05-16 Thread Yuriy Kozlov
Closing task for Edgy since Edgy is no longer supported. ** Changed in: edgy-backports Status: New => Invalid -- Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/71056 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters

[Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2007-02-07 Thread Michael Biebl
The dcop error messages are actually a problem in KDE: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122020 This has been fixed in 3.5.6 There's not really much that kdesvn can do about this. -- Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/71056 -- ubuntu-backports

[Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2007-01-24 Thread zenrox
just cause it wont happen for dapper ** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream) Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected -- Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/71056 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings

[Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2007-01-24 Thread zenrox
ok i tried doing libsvn0 but it required libneon26(no ver in edgy) but it required libssl-dev 0.9.8.c-1(in edgy but not going to screw with that as i use it everywhare) not libssl-dev 0.9.8.b2 -- Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/71056 -- ubunt

[Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2007-01-22 Thread John Dong
Does not build in Edgy due to new svn binding packaging (libsvn-dev is in Feisty and beyond) Does not build in Dapper due to that and other reasons. -- Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/71056 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@li

[Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2007-01-12 Thread Cos Costa
wow, sounds good ... That means hopefully we will get rid of those problems in april ;) Is there a chance for a backport to edgy and dapper (maybe before april) , cause its still producing a pretty ugly behaviour in konqueror on those releases. would be great to see it working ... if its possibl

[Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2007-01-11 Thread Michael Bienia
kdesvn 0.11.0-1 is now available in feisty. -- Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/71056 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backpo

[Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2007-01-03 Thread Steveire
It's still v0.8.5 in feisty. http://packages.ubuntu.com/feisty/devel/kdesvn I'd also like to see this upgraded. -- Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/71056 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsu

[Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2006-11-30 Thread John Dong
As I've said, there's not much I can do about it until the build dependencies are tweaked I'll consider doing a manual backport and see if I can get anyone to sponsor it. -- Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/71056 -- ubuntu-backports mailing

[Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2006-11-30 Thread Cos Costa
don't know if unconfirmed is the best status to mark the bug / backport request, because the actual kdesvn version totaly breaks konqueror in edgy. It crashes konqueror every so often or throws DCop or wrong menu-Entries (Exportto/Checkoutto) in the /usr/share/apps/konqueror/servicemenus/kdesvn

[Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2006-11-18 Thread zenrox
it built in prevu thx i needed to know that ** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream) Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed -- Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/71056 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify s

[Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2006-11-18 Thread John Dong
apt-get source kdesvn cd kdesvn-* patch -p0 < mypatch.patch prevu That should build kdesvn with my changes :) And cmake has been scheduled for backporting to Dapper already... let's see what happens when the dust settles :) -- Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy h

[Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2006-11-18 Thread zenrox
does not build in prevu for edgy tho i suspect if i can get that control script in to prevus build then i can build this -- Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/71056 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settin

Re: [Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2006-11-14 Thread John Dong
I have not had a chance to see if this builds yet. Got sidetracked by cmake :-P On 11/14/06, Cos Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hey john dong, > > is that edgy build/backport somewhere available ? > Longing to get it :) > > -- > Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy > https:

[Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2006-11-14 Thread Cos Costa
hey john dong, is that edgy build/backport somewhere available ? Longing to get it :) -- Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/71056 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://list

[Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2006-11-09 Thread John Dong
Does not build on Dapper, requires cmake 2.4. I am looking into a cmake backport. -- Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/71056 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-back

[Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2006-11-09 Thread John Dong
Builds on Edgy with following change: === modified file 'debian/control' --- debian/control 2006-11-09 15:25:01 + +++ debian/control 2006-11-09 15:32:28 + @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: devel Priority: optional Maintainer: Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends: cdbs, debh

[Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2006-11-09 Thread John Dong
MOTU: Build dependency "libsvn-dev" should be "libsvn0-dev", else kdesvn FTBFS'es on Ubuntu dapper/edgy/feisty. ** Also affects: kdesvn (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/71056 -- u

[Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2006-11-09 Thread John Dong
kdesvn | 0.11.0-1 | http://server feisty/universe Sources Actually, it is in Feisty :) -- Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/71056 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/

[Bug 71056] Re: Please backport kdesvn 0.11.0 to Breezy, Dapper and Edgy

2006-11-09 Thread Lionel Le Folgoc
Not relevant to plf. Assigning to dapper-backports, but it will probably be rejected, since kdesvn 0.11.0 isn't available in feisty. ** Changed in: plf (upstream) Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected ** Also affects: dapper-backports (upstream) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirm