Great, thanks for the testing. ACK from backporters.
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: maverick-backports
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Changed in: maverick-backp
** Changed in: maverick-backports
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721886
Title:
Please backport tor-arm 1.4.0.1-2 from natty to l
Confirmed working on Maverick (although the "tor-arm" package lists
"tor" as a suggested package instead of dependency).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721886
Title:
P
Found a volunteer that tested on lucid (10.04), still trying to find
someone with maverick.
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https:/
Our experience has been that this test is not pointless, which is why it
is a hard requirement for the backports process. Testing inside of a
lucid/maverick chroot is acceptable, but testing on a different release
is not.
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
** Ch
Ack, missed the last bit of the comment - I installed and ran them both
on karmic but not maverick/lucid. This is a pure python package and been
exercised on several Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, Arch Linux, and Slackware
versions already without any platform-specific issues. If it's really
_vital_ that
Thanks Evan. I've tested the packages, using them to monitor a Tor
relay. Both look good. -Damian
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Changed in: maverick-backports
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are
