Re: Log-rotation doesn't work for catalina.out in src:tomcat9 as intended

2022-05-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi, On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 5:07 AM Evren Yurtesen wrote: > > Hi Robie and Utkarsh, > > > This issue is not isolated to tomcat9 package. For example, jetty9 package > logging does not work. Rsyslog says: This reminded me that frr is also affected by this:

Re: Log-rotation doesn't work for catalina.out in src:tomcat9 as intended

2022-05-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi, On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 5:07 AM Evren Yurtesen wrote: > > Hi Robie and Utkarsh, > > > This issue is not isolated to tomcat9 package. For example, jetty9 package > logging does not work. Rsyslog says: This reminded me that frr is also affected by this:

[Bug 827151] Re: Annoying log message "DIGEST-MD5 common mech free"

2022-05-06 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1677781] Re: Missing dep8 tests

2022-05-06 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1677781

[Bug 1971272] Re: Merge cyrus-sasl2 from Debian unstable for kinetic

2022-05-06 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971272 Title: Merge cyrus-sasl2 from Debian unstable for kinetic To manage

[Bug 1677781] Re: Missing dep8 tests

2022-05-06 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1677781 Title: Missing dep8 tests To man

[Bug 1971272] Re: Merge cyrus-sasl2 from Debian unstable for kinetic

2022-05-06 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971272 Title: Merge cyrus-sasl2 from Debian unsta

[Bug 1971279] Re: Merge haproxy from Debian unstable for kinetic

2022-05-06 Thread Andreas Hasenack
We should consider switching to the 2.5.x series now. 2.6.x will be upstream's next LTS, and due a release in Q2 this year: 2.6-dev ~2022-Q22027-Q2 (dev » LTS) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1971935] Re: Invalid pipefs-directory prevents rpc-gssd.service from starting

2022-05-06 Thread Andreas Hasenack
> We're using Puppet to configure our systems and one of the steps is to ensure > gss-rpcd.service is > up and running. Can you come up with the ordering in which this nfs host is provisioned, in terms of nfs and kerberos configuration and such? I concur that having to reboot is not ideal. --

[Bug 1971935] Re: Invalid pipefs-directory prevents rpc-gssd.service from starting

2022-05-06 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The commit that introduced the generator has this explanation: commit 3892174834ea1a4729348f0ecd3078cc1d5458e4 Author: Scott Mayhew Date: Mon Apr 10 07:10:45 2017 -0400 systemd: add a generator for the rpc_pipefs mountpoint The nfs.conf has config options for the rpc_pipefs

[Bug 1971935] Re: Invalid pipefs-directory prevents rpc-gssd.service from starting

2022-05-06 Thread Andreas Hasenack
But I would still like to understand how you arrived at gssd complaining about the pipefs mount. Were you just trying to start it manually? ** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1971935] Re: Invalid pipefs-directory prevents rpc-gssd.service from starting

2022-05-06 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Can you elaborate a bit on your scenario? Since you are trying to start gssd, I assume you have a kerberos environment, and the server has a keytab in /etc/krb5.keytab (which is a condition for the gssd service to start). In my tests, I also usually reboot the server after installing all the nfs

Sending LTO delta to Debian

2022-05-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi, this came up again in a review, and I wanted to ask a broader audience. How to we send LTO[1] related delta to Debian, given that Debian isn't using LTO (yet)? Case in point was the ust package[2], which has this bit[3] part of the delta (just showing the first hunk): @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@

[Bug 1971788] [NEW] Failure to enable SSL out of the box when in fips mode

2022-05-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: mysql-8.0 is failing to enable SSL on a fresh install if the running environment has FIPS enabled. This can be easily reproduced in a cloud image that has fips enabled, like https://azuremarketplace.microsoft.com/en-

[Bug 1850927] Re: Configuration comment suggests non-default /tmp/radius configuration which doesn't exist by default

2022-05-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The comments above the suggested /tmp/radiusd directory explain the requirements for the tmpdir parameter. While we can argue that /tmp is not the best place perhaps, the requirements won't change. ** Changed in: freeradius (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Opinion -- You received this bug

Re: Missiing bacula-fd for 9.6.7-3 Ubuntu 2204

2022-05-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
It was later fixed in debian, and I synced it for ubuntu kinetic, but it's indeed missing from jammy: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula I suppose an SRU could reintroduce it? Any volunteers? On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 10:41 PM Alex Murray wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-05-03 at 10:48:21 -0400,

[Bug 1953065] Re: 2.13.0 FTBFS

2022-05-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Merge proposal unlinked: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/ust/+git/ust/+merge/421513 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953065 Title: 2.13.0 FTBFS To manage

[Bug 1967024] Re: Version 4.5.0+~cs15.1.4-3 in ubuntu jammy FTBFS - proxy errors in tests

2022-05-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Changed in: node-configurable-http-proxy (Ubuntu) Assignee: Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: node-configurable-http-proxy (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Triaged ** Tags added: ftbfs -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1873923] Re: freeradius with freeradius-python3 fails to start out of the box

2022-05-04 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] The python3 rlm module cannot be loaded. [Test Plan] # pull the necessary attachments wget https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeradius/+bug/1873923/+attachment/5580525/+files/ubuntu_example.py

[Bug 1969381] Re: Update DEP8 test

2022-05-04 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Changed in: freeradius (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969381 Title: Update DEP8 test To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1932290] Re: Update tango to 9.3.4

2022-05-04 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/tango/+git/tango/+merge/421391 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932290 Title: Update tango to 9.3.4

[Bug 1778890] Re: report catalina.out through apport?

2022-05-04 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Tags removed: server-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778890 Title: report catalina.out through apport? To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1962203] Re: Unable to join to active directory after KB5008380/CVE-2021-42287

2022-05-03 Thread Andreas Hasenack
> I can confirm that it seems to work now with Ubuntu 22.04 Did you mean the jammy packages from https://launchpad.net/~ahasenack/+archive/ubuntu/adcli-1962203, or the normal samba packages from the ubuntu jammy release? Because I did not add the upstream patches for this issue to the jammy

[Bug 1962203] Re: Unable to join to active directory after KB5008380/CVE-2021-42287

2022-05-03 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The upstream bug is not fully closed yet (https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/realmd/adcli/-/issues/27). We can probably build test packages for bionic and focal, but I'm unsure about an official SRU at this time. ** Bug watch added: gitlab.freedesktop.org/realmd/adcli/-/issues #27

[Bug 1967024] Re: Version 4.5.0+~cs15.1.4-3 in ubuntu jammy FTBFS - proxy errors in tests

2022-05-02 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The linked branch didn't fix the problem when the package is built in LP. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967024 Title: Version 4.5.0+~cs15.1.4-3 in ubuntu jammy FTBFS - proxy errors

+1 maintenance report, 25 through 29/may/2022

2022-05-02 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi, this was a slow week, due to the post-release freeze still in effect. I grabbed these packages to work on: ## nmap ftbfs Submitted to debian via https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/nmap/-/merge_requests/3 And also uploaded the same fix to ubuntu. Once debian does a new upload, I'll

[Bug 1970979] Re: compiler flags leaking through krb5-config --libs

2022-05-02 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Post in the upstream mailing list, let's see if this spawns a discussion: https://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/krbdev/2022-April/013543.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970979 Title:

[Bug 1970898] Re: unable to use nfs client to mount nfs in Ubuntu 22.04

2022-05-02 Thread Andreas Hasenack
> I was also unable to use NFS mounts since upgrading my client to 22.04. I believe even previous versions of Ubuntu defaulted to NFSv4 on the client when mounting a remote filesystem. From which ubuntu release did you upgrade? You didn't have to force vers=3 in that older release? -- You

[Bug 1971096] Re: Cannot Specify Fixed Ports for mountd and statd

2022-05-02 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi, the /etc/default/nfs-* files are ignored by the NFS server or client in Ubuntu 22.04. They were left there as a precaution because of the conversion process that converts those options into the new /etc/nfs.conf and /etc/nfs.conf.d/local.conf files. I do agree it causes confusion, and the

Re: I disabled lto, but it comes back in via -config --libs

2022-04-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi, On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 10:50 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > I think your main question has been addressed. But I want to ask, why is it a > problem to have part of this code with LTO enabled? Generally we disable > LTO only when it is causing build failures. Was that the case here? I

[Bug 1967024] Re: Version 4.5.0+~cs15.1.4-3 in ubuntu jammy FTBFS - proxy errors in tests

2022-04-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Changed in: node-configurable-http-proxy (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) ** Changed in: node-configurable-http-proxy (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

Re: I disabled lto, but it comes back in via -config --libs

2022-04-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi Sergio, thanks for the reply On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 3:14 PM Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Either way, I believe this issue should be addressed in krb5 as I said > above. I haven't been able to find any bug about this in upstream's bug > tracker. I filed

[Bug 1970979] [NEW] compiler flags leaking through krb5-config --libs

2022-04-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: krb5-config --libs is leaking some compiler specific flags that we define in Ubuntu: $ krb5-config --libs -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/mit-krb5 -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -flto=auto -Wl,-z,relro -lkrb5 -lk5crypto -lcom_err That ones that concern

[Bug 1970634] Re: FTBFS: mariadb fails to start due to low MEMLOCK limit

2022-04-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
> Could it be -flto/-ffat-lto-objects related (like > https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-25633)? > The top part of the stack trace looks the same. Nice catch. Indeed, disabling lto fixes the build and startup in low memlock conditions. I'm still concerned with lto creeping in via

[Bug 1969160] Re: mariadb [ERROR] mysqld got signal 6

2022-04-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1970634 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970634 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1970634 FTBFS: mariadb fails to start due to low MEMLOCK limit -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

Re: I disabled lto, but it comes back in via -config --libs

2022-04-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Same thing with -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2018-June/040371.html On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 10:50 AM Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > Hi, > > I disabled lto in a build according to the instructions from [1]: > > export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPT

I disabled lto, but it comes back in via -config --libs

2022-04-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi, I disabled lto in a build according to the instructions from [1]: export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=optimize=-lto But I saw that it was still present in some steps of the build. Notably when krb5/gssapi was used: ... -- Found GSSAPI: -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/mit-krb5

[Bug 1970898] Re: unable to use nfs client to mount nfs in Ubuntu 22.04

2022-04-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
> It's just stuck there, not doing anything. Any ideas? Anything I can do or > add to debug the > situation? Any other clients not `nfs-common`? Have you checked firewall rules? Please also check (and attach) /var/log/syslog, the actual output of `showmount -e `, and dmesg recent output. **

[Bug 1970634] Re: FTBFS: mariadb fails to start due to low MEMLOCK limit

2022-04-28 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Since mariadb on the current jammy kernel disables io_uring at startup, I'm considering disabling io_uring entirely in the jammy mariadb build. The only scenario where io_uring would be used by the jammy mariadb is if the user ran a different kernel than the one shipped with jammy. -- You

[Bug 1970634] Re: FTBFS: test failure due to low memlock limit

2022-04-28 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I added a task for systemd to consider raising the default RLIMIT_MEMLOCK limit. This upstream commit raises the default limit to 8Mb: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/852b62507b2 The way things are now, the following scenario does NOT work out of the box: - jammy lxd on focal host -

[Bug 1970634] Re: FTBFS: test failure due to low memlock limit

2022-04-28 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970634 Title: FTBFS: test failure due to low memlock limit To manage

[Bug 1970634] Re: FTBFS: test failure due to low memlock limit

2022-04-28 Thread Andreas Hasenack
On uring and memlock: https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/liburing/tree/README#n19 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970634 Title: FTBFS: test failure due to low memlock limit To manage

[Bug 1970634] Re: FTBFS: test failure due to low memlock limit

2022-04-27 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Ok, after some experimenting and code inspection, this is the summary. This is the logic that decides if mariadb 10.6.7 will try to use uring or not, AT RUNTIME: bool innodb_use_native_aio_default() { #ifdef HAVE_URING utsname = uname_for_io_uring; if (!uname() && u.release[0] == '5' &&

[Bug 1970634] [NEW] FTBFS: test failure due to low memlock limit

2022-04-27 Thread Andreas Hasenack
different back then or ... stuff ** Affects: mariadb-10.6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) Status: In Progress ** Tags: server-todo ** Tags added: server-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 1970630] Re: FTBFS: no more bundled libssh2 in source dfsg tarball

2022-04-27 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Submitted to debian via https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security- team/nmap/-/merge_requests/3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970630 Title: FTBFS: no more bundled libssh2 in source

[Bug 1970630] [NEW] FTBFS: no more bundled libssh2 in source dfsg tarball

2022-04-27 Thread Andreas Hasenack
(Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970630 Title: FTBFS: no more bundled libssh2

[Bug 1956191] Re: Sendmail 8.17.1 update request

2022-04-26 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This also builds with openssl 3.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956191 Title: Sendmail 8.17.1 update request To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1970472] [NEW] FTBFS with openssl 3

2022-04-26 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: sendmail 8.16.1 fails to build with openssl 3 in jammy[1]: Among the various deprecation warnings, there are several errors in sendmail/tls.c: tls.c:99:11: error: invalid use of incomplete typedef ‘DH’ {aka ‘struct dh_st’} 99 | dh->p = BN_bin2bn(dh512_p,

[Bug 1969676] [NEW] Stash file /etc/krb5kdc/stash uses DEPRECATED enctype des3-cbc-sha1

2022-04-20 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: When provisioning a new realm, this warning is logged in /var/log/syslog: ==> /var/log/syslog <== Apr 20

[Bug 1969619] Re: RDP Sharing appears on by default in jammy

2022-04-20 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I think this is a bit more nefarious. On an installed system, all you have to do to have port 3389/tcp suddenly open is to *visit* the "share" tab in the settings. No need to change a thing, just visit it, then close the window. Boom, you have rdp desktop sharing running. At least it's a random

[Bug 1969626] [NEW] tcp* bpfcc programs fail to run, compile error

2022-04-20 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: On jammy bpfcc-tools0.18.0+ds-2 # uname -a Linux nsn7 5.15.0-25-generic #25-Ubuntu SMP Wed Mar 30 15:54:22 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux root@nsn7:~# tcpaccept-bpfcc In file included from :2: In file included from /virtual/include/bcc/bpf.h:12: In file

[Bug 1969625] [NEW] ERROR: Could not resolve symbol: /proc/self/exec:BEGIN_trigger

2022-04-20 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: jammy bpftrace 0.14.0-1 Any bpftrace program fails with: # tcplife.bt Attaching 3 probes... ERROR: Could not resolve symbol: /proc/self/exe:BEGIN_trigger # uname -a Linux nsn7 5.15.0-25-generic #25-Ubuntu SMP Wed Mar 30 15:54:22 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64

[Bug 1969524] Re: Broken login on jammy VM using wayland, on a jammy host

2022-04-19 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The suggestion worked. With this diff: --- ubuntu-18.04.xml2022-04-19 17:30:37.918180255 -0300 +++ /usr/share/osinfo/os/ubuntu.com/ubuntu-18.04.xml2022-04-19 17:30:42.598283410 -0300 @@ -49,10 +49,6 @@ 16106127360 - - http://pcisig.com/pci/1af4/1050"/> -

[Bug 1969524] [NEW] Broken login on jammy VM using wayland, on a jammy host

2022-04-19 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: I have a jammy laptop I installed today, and I used the same iso to create a jammy VM using virt-manager. In that VM, after the installation is complete, I cannot login. The screen either stays black, or throws me back to the login prompt. If I switch to Xorg login type, then

[Bug 1969247] Re: fallocate with FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE produces zero-size files on zfs in Jammy

2022-04-19 Thread Andreas Hasenack
On jammy, it works on btrfs: root@nsn7:/mnt# rm -f foo.img; touch foo.img; fallocate -z -l 10M foo.img; ls -lah foo.img -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10M abr 19 10:46 foo.img root@nsn7:/mnt# mount -t btrfs /btrfs.img on /mnt type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache=v2,subvolid=5,subvol=/) -- You

[Bug 1969247] Re: fallocate with FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE produces zero-size files on zfs in Jammy

2022-04-19 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I applied zfs_fallocate_reserve_percent=0 to the kernel module, confirmed it was set, but I still see the same incorrect behavior with fallocate: root@nsn7:/tank/test# rm -f foo.img; touch foo.img; fallocate -z -l 10M foo.img; ls -lah foo.img -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 abr 19 10:35 foo.img

[Bug 1969247] Re: fallocate with FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE produces zero-size files on zfs in Jammy

2022-04-19 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Impish kernel on zfs: andreas@nsnx:~$ rm foo.img andreas@nsnx:~$ touch foo.img andreas@nsnx:~$ fallocate -z -l 10M foo.img fallocate: fallocate failed: Operation not supported Jammy kernel on zfs: root@j1:~# touch foo.img root@j1:~# fallocate -z -l 10M foo.img root@j1:~# ll foo.img

[Bug 1969247] Re: fallocate with FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE produces zero-size files on zfs in Jammy

2022-04-19 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The impish kernel returns "not supported" when fallocate is used in the way mysql does it. That makes mysql aware of the problem, and switch strategies, and it works. The jammy kernel is saying all is fine with the call and its results, but it isn't. Mysql, or any userspace, shouldn't be second

[Bug 1873923] Re: freeradius with freeradius-python3 fails to start out of the box

2022-04-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] The python3 rlm module cannot be loaded. [Test Plan] # pull the necessary attachments wget https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeradius/+bug/1873923/+attachment/5580525/+files/ubuntu_example.py

[Bug 1969381] [NEW] Update DEP8 test

2022-04-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
. ** Affects: freeradius (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Assignee: Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) Status: Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969381 Title: Update DEP8 test

[Bug 1969247] Re: mysql-server install crashes in LXD container on Jammy host

2022-04-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I'm suspecting fallocate() on zfs. To reproduce, one can follow these steps: rm -rf /var/lib/mysql/* mysqld --initialize This will produce a zero-sized file: # ll /var/lib/mysql/ib_logfile1 -rw-r- 1 mysql mysql 0 Apr 18 17:37 /var/lib/mysql/ib_logfile1 Attempting to start mysql now will

[Bug 1873923] Re: freeradius with freeradius-python3 fails to start out of the box

2022-04-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Focal update uploaded, it's in focal-unapproved now $ dput ubuntu ../freeradius_3.0.20+dfsg-3ubuntu0.1_source.changes Uploading freeradius using ftp to ubuntu (host: upload.ubuntu.com; directory: /ubuntu) running badauthor: Stop if uploading with root@ or ubuntu@ email adresses. running

[Bug 1873923] Re: freeradius with freeradius-python3 fails to start out of the box

2022-04-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] The python3 rlm module cannot be loaded. [Test Plan] # pull the necessary attachments wget https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeradius/+bug/1873923/+attachment/5580525/+files/ubuntu_example.py

[Bug 1873923] Re: freeradius with freeradius-python3 fails to start out of the box

2022-04-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] The python3 rlm module cannot be loaded. [Test Plan] # pull the necessary attachments wget https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeradius/+bug/1873923/+attachment/5580525/+files/ubuntu_example.py

[Bug 1968919] Re: Spurious needrestart runs on do-release-upgrade

2022-04-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I added a task for ubuntu-manual-tests, as I think this can be easily described as such a test until we have automation to cover it. ** Also affects: ubuntu-manual-tests Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1968919] Re: Spurious needrestart runs on do-release-upgrade

2022-04-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Just to record other instances of restart prompts that happen on a regular update. I haven't verified if they happen on do-release-upgrade, but if they do, I think it's the same case. - glibc update: there is a prompt about restarting services - docker update: it also prompts about letting it be

[Bug 1873923] Re: freeradius with freeradius-python3 fails to start out of the box

2022-04-13 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Attachment added: "python3" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeradius/+bug/1873923/+attachment/5580526/+files/python3 ** Description changed: [Impact] The python3 rlm module cannot be loaded. [Test Plan] # pull the necessary attachments - wget ... + wget

[Bug 1873923] Re: freeradius with freeradius-python3 fails to start out of the box

2022-04-13 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and + + * justification for backporting the fix to the stable release. + + * In addition, it is helpful, but not required, to include an +explanation of how the upload fixes this bug. + + [Test

[Bug 1873923] Re: freeradius with freeradius-python3 fails to start out of the box

2022-04-13 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I identified the necessary fixes and came up with a test case. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873923 Title: freeradius with freeradius-python3 fails to start out of the box To

[Bug 1873923] Re: freeradius with freeradius-python3 fails to start out of the box

2022-04-13 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I found some issues and am working through them in https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/freeradius/+git/freeradius/+ref/focal- freeradius-py3.8-1873923. It's not ready yet, though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1878601] Re: Merge nfs-utils from Debian experimental for 22.04 - version in Ubuntu is *very* old

2022-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I updated the release notes and server guide. ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-notes Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: serverguide Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Information type changed from Public Security to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950321 Title: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
It's all showing up in component mismatches now (https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches- proposed) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950321 Title: [MIR][FFE]

[Bug 1968612] Re: Ubuntu 20.04 Cloud Image: NFS Server not working

2022-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I see you are running the kvm kernel flavor, and indeed I don't see the nfsd.ko module, nor a package named like linux-modules-extra-kvm, which, in the case of the other cloud kernels, does have nfsd.ko. I'm changing this bug to be about the linux kernel, as they can answer best why nfsd.ko is

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Seed change merged. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950321 Title: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Here is the seed change PR: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu- seeds/+git/platform/+merge/419225 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950321 Title: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs To

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Merge proposal unlinked: https://code.launchpad.net/~canonical-server/+git/team-subscriptions/+merge/419221 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950321 Title: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

[Bug 1967245] Re: 'net usershare' returned error 255 on jammy-desktop-amd64

2022-04-09 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Ok, that's a different issue, and a configuration one. You have to check the file permissions on /home, /home/vm and /home/vm/share and make sure the user guest is mapped to on the server can access those directories and the files in it. To find out which linux user on the server that is, check

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This is the diff in the samba-vfs-modules package contents: $ diff -u samba-vfs-modules-gluster-in-universe.list samba-vfs-modules-gluster-in-main.list --- samba-vfs-modules-gluster-in-universe.list 2022-04-08 14:14:23.928484249 -0300 +++ samba-vfs-modules-gluster-in-main.list 2022-04-08

[Bug 1894618] Re: samba vfs glusterfs shares do not work because glusterfs.so is missing from samba-vfs-modules

2022-04-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The MIR[1] was approved, let's see if we can get this going. 1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/1950321 ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (aha

[Bug 1950321] Re: [MIR][FFE] glusterfs

2022-04-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This is the samba bug requesting glusterfs support: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1894618 I suppose that should be an FFe now? The diff in the samba package is shown in this MP I just filed:

[Bug 1554652] Re: nautilus-share broken with libpam-smbpass removed

2022-04-04 Thread Andreas Hasenack
> But please, please, at the very least add some tooltip or popup dialog or > text label (or modify > an existing one) that informs the user that he is expected to manually add a > samba user! Not only that, but the password needs to be kept in sync manually. If you change the linux password,

[Bug 1967245] Re: 'net usershare' returned error 255 on jammy-desktop-amd64

2022-04-04 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) => nautilus-share (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: nautilus-share (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: nautilus-share (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) ** Changed in: nautilus-share (Ubuntu) Status:

[Bug 1967245] Re: 'net usershare' returned error 255 on jammy-desktop-amd64

2022-04-04 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Ok, the was passed as an empty space, I missed that in my copy paste. This works: root@nsn7:~# net usershare add --long Public /home/andreas/Public "" Everyone:R,andreas:F guest_ok=y [Public] path=/home/andreas/Public comment= usershare_acl=Everyone:R,Unix User\andreas:F, guest_ok=y Now on

[Bug 1967245] Re: 'net usershare' returned error 255 on jammy-desktop-amd64

2022-04-04 Thread Andreas Hasenack
execsnoop tells me this is the command being run: net 5212 3561 0 /usr/bin/net usershare add -l Public /home/andreas/Public Everyone:R,andreas:F guest_ok=y or this, without guest access: net 5779 3561 0 /usr/bin/net usershare add -l Public

[Bug 1967245] Re: 'net usershare' returned error 255 on jammy-desktop-amd64

2022-04-04 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Is this what you saw? ** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2022-04-04 09-46-42.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1967245/+attachment/5576862/+files/Screenshot%20from%202022-04-04%2009-46-42.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1951490] Re: Can't print after update to 4.13

2022-04-04 Thread Andreas Hasenack
We still need an Ubuntu Impish verification, any volunteers? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951490 Title: Can't print after update to 4.13 To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1967632] Re: apparmor denied when trying to load pkcs11 module for smart card authentication

2022-04-02 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The upstream firefox binary tarball loads the pkcs11 module just fine from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967632 Title: apparmor denied when trying to

[Bug 1967632] [NEW] apparmor denied when trying to load pkcs11 module for smart card authentication

2022-04-02 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: I use a smart card to access government sites. I have that working in firefox and chrome on ubuntu impish, and gave jammy a try, but there firefox won't load the library, giving me a generic error. dmesg, however, shows this apparmor denied message: [sáb abr 2 17:32:27

[Bug 1882272] Re: fancontrol does not work after sleep/wakeup

2022-04-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] When resuming from suspend, the fancontrol service is in a failed state. Fans might be stopped, at full speed, or in an indeterminate state. A restart of the service after resume gets it working again, and this fix uses a system-sleep hook script to

[Bug 1882272] Re: fancontrol does not work after sleep/wakeup

2022-04-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] + When resuming from suspend, the fancontrol service is in a failed state. Fans might be stopped, at full speed, or indeterminate state in general. - * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and + A restart of the service after resume gets it

[Bug 1967432] Re: After resume from suspend, fancontrol can be running even if it was disabled before

2022-04-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] The fix for bug #1882272, currently applied to Impish and Jammy via a debian sync, has a collateral effect that it may leave the fancontrol service started after a resume from suspend even if it was disabled and/or stopped. The fix wraps the

[Bug 1967432] Re: After resume from suspend, fancontrol can be running even if it was disabled before

2022-04-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] The fix for bug #1882272, currently applied to Impish and Jammy via a debian sync, has a collateral effect that it may leave the fancontrol service started after a resume from suspend even if it was disabled and/or stopped. The fix wraps the

[Bug 1967432] Re: After resume from suspend, fancontrol can be running even if it was disabled before

2022-04-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
e" call, and only issue the restart if fancontrol was already running when the machine was suspended. ** Also affects: lm-sensors (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Low Assignee: Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: lm-sensors (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Un

[Bug 1967432] Re: After resume from suspend, fancontrol can be running even if it was disabled before

2022-04-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] The fix for bug #1882272, currently applied to Impish and Jammy via a debian sync, has a collateral effect that it may leave the fancontrol service started after a resume from suspend even if it was disabled and/or stopped. The fix wraps the

[Bug 1967432] Re: After resume from suspend, fancontrol can be running even if it was disabled before

2022-04-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] - * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and + The fix for bug #1882272, currently applied to Impish and Jammy via a + debian sync, has a collateral effect that it may leave the fancontrol + service started after a resume from suspend even if it

[Bug 1882272] Re: fancontrol does not work after sleep/wakeup

2022-04-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and + + * justification for backporting the fix to the stable release. + + * In addition, it is helpful, but not required, to include an +explanation of how the upload fixes this bug. + + [Test

[Bug 1967432] Re: After resume from suspend, fancontrol can be running even if it was disabled before

2022-04-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and + + * justification for backporting the fix to the stable release. + + * In addition, it is helpful, but not required, to include an +explanation of how the upload fixes this bug. + + [Test

[Bug 1967432] [NEW] After resume from suspend, fancontrol can be running even if it was disabled before

2022-03-31 Thread Andreas Hasenack
emctl is-active fancontrol.service" call, and only issue the restart if fancontrol was already running when the machine was suspended. ** Affects: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Assignee: Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug noti

[Bug 1882272] Re: fancontrol does not work after sleep/wakeup

2022-03-31 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I was testing the solution adopted in lm-sensors 3.6.0-6 and later, and there is something that is bothering me a bit. To recap, the fix that was applied is to restart the fancontrol service in the systemd-sleep hook. That sounds find, but imagine this scenario. I installed fancontrol, it's

<    7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   >