This is very hard to troubleshoot at the moment, because I just can't
get the build-dependencies installed, either with noble or noble-
proposed:
noble:
$ sudo apt-get build-dep .
Note, using directory '.' to get the build dependencies
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree...
** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack)
** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: sssd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack)
** Changed in: sssd (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
Synced https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/isc-kea/2.4.1-3 from debian
to fix this.
** Changed in: isc-kea (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
An upload of livecd-rootfs to focal-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "The focal upload contains
undocumented changes to live-build/functions. After discussion, it was
agreed that a new bug will be filed specifically for that change, and
included in a new
I see some:
# git ubuntu remote add athos-ribeiro
# let's build the php8.1-ztest packages matching the version from the release
pocket
git checkout zend-test-ext-nofix
I suppose you didn't mean to comment the remote add?
Also, this requires the git-ubuntu snap being installed. Which is fine,
Missing build dependencies: sssd-common
sssd is failing to build on armhf due to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/2058576
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058964
I see the same code in mantic's crun package, and the problem can also
be reproduced there:
$ uname -a
Linux nsnx2 6.5.0-25-generic #25-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Feb 7 14:58:39
UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ grep VERSION_CODENAME /etc/os-release
VERSION_CODENAME=mantic
$
Hello Brian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted php8.1 into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php8.1/8.1.2-1ubuntu2.15 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Tags added: server-todo
** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Tags added: server-todo
** Changed in: sssd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058576
Title:
FTBFS: armhf: build-time test failures
To manage
Accepting this into jammy-proposed is pending verification of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/2046439 which is in
jammy-proposed already. Either that, or you do a new upload to jammy-
unapproved covering both bugs in the changes file, but that will require
then a new
I'm also updating the test case to make sure crun is installed, because
runc can also satisfy podman's dependency on an OCI runtime.
** Description changed:
[Impact]
podman containers using the default crun backend do not work anymore with the
6.5 HWE kernel in 22.04
[Test plan]
1.
Hello Faustin, or anyone else affected,
Accepted crun into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/crun/0.17+dfsg-1.1ubuntu0.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
I updated the test case one more time to request a run with the jammy GA
kernel, to make sure we haven't regressed that (unaffected) use case.
I'm accepting the jammy upload to get things going, but the mantic
question from comment #24 will need to be addressed before the jammy fix
can hit
Launchpad notified me there was an OOPS before when I ran the release
script for this package in jammy:
Launchpad encountered an internal error during the following operation:
copying package samba. It was logged with id
OOPS-506a4e55f3c1962e07e46d85360f5ffe. Sorry for the inconvenience.
I
Hi all, I'm looking at the focal upload in unapproved.
I see it has this additional change in live-build/functions that is not
mentioned in d/changelog:
--- a/live-build/functions
+++ b/live-build/functions
@@ -726,13 +726,44 @@ snap_preseed() {
snap_validate_seed() {
local
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 4:55 PM Andreas Hasenack wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 4:54 PM Lucas Kanashiro
> wrote:
> >
> > # Bug triage
> >
> > ## https://pad.lv/2058942 || D | New | mysql-8.0
>
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 4:54 PM Lucas Kanashiro
wrote:
>
> # Bug triage
>
> ## https://pad.lv/2058942 || D | New | mysql-8.0
> | package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.36-0ubuntu0.23.10.1 failed to … |
>
> Marked as Incomplete. Asked for more information.
>
> ##
This update is missing the mantic verification, which blocks a jammy
release.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052642
Title:
opeanfs-modules-dkms FTBS with linux 6.5 on jammy
To
The verification of the Stable Release Update for samba has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apt-mirror has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
Hi, could the question from comment #16 be clarified please?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046439
Title:
Wrong code execution of s390x code with qemu TCG
To manage notifications
Thank you for the updated jammy verification using the local apt mirror
check. The focal verification should follow the same steps, so I'll tag
focal as verification-needed still, but jammy looks good now in that
regard.
** Tags removed: verification-done-focal
** Tags added:
Hello Mauricio, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libvirt into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/8.0.0-1ubuntu7.9 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Please include the "normal" execution from comment #5 in the test plan,
besides the synthetic one.
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you
I think a build with an older boost worked:
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ Build-Depends:
docbook-xsl,
elinks,
flex,
- libboost-dev,
- libboost-system-dev,
+ libboost1.74-dev,
+ libboost-system1.74-dev,
liblog4cplus-dev,
libpq-dev,
libssl-dev,
Locally I
When using the shutdown command via the API, kea-ctrl-agent does not
segfault:
# kea-shell --auth-user kea-api --auth-password $(cat
/etc/kea/kea-api-password) --host localhost shutdown
[ { "result": 0, "text": "Control Agent is shutting down" } ]
I had the server running inside gdb:
(...)
A rebuild of the package in noble release (not proposed) currently also
segfaults in ppc64el :/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055151
Title:
kea-ctrl-agent segfault in ppc64el dep8
Sorry, wrong analysis, the rebuild is still segfaulting
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055151
Title:
kea-ctrl-agent segfault in ppc64el dep8 test
To manage notifications about this
I had a ppc64el machine where I reproduced this segfault before. I just
logged in again, updated the environment to latest noble proposed, and
did a new rebuild. Those new binaries didn't segfault anymore.
I'm now doing a "proper" build in a ppa, and will run the DEP8 tests
there (or locally, if
I'm looking at this again.
** Changed in: isc-kea (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055151
Title:
kea-ctrl-agent segfault in ppc64el
Ubuntu Noble release notes[1] updated with the glusterfs demotion
information, and impact on samba and qemu packages.
1. https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/noble-numbat-release-notes/39890
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-notes
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug
Subscribed mruffell who authored that particular SRU, for consideration.
** Tags added: regression-update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059197
Title:
Issue with nfs4.0 mounts
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+git/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+merge/462780
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+git/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+merge/462781
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+git/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+merge/462778
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+git/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+merge/462779
-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack)
Status: Fix Committed
** Affects: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
This is in noble proposed already. Unsubscribing sponsors, setting bug
task to "fix committed".
** Changed in: openvas-scanner (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Sponsored
Uploading black_24.2.0-1ubuntu1.dsc
Uploading black_24.2.0-1ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz
Uploading black_24.2.0-1ubuntu1_source.buildinfo
Uploading black_24.2.0-1ubuntu1_source.changes
** Changed in: black (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug
> I did that and published
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/lcm/+git/lcm/+ref/ubuntu/devel
Please create a merge proposal against pkg/ubuntu/devel, and there has been a
new upload to noble since you pushed. It will be easier to review in an MP.
I started a quick review, here
Jose, if you feel like you answered the question from #2, then please
change the bug status back to new, or else the release team won't get
back to this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
src:ubuntu-advantage-tools version 31 introduced[1] an apparmor profile
to the apt-news service. It's known that some ubuntu systems do not have
apparmor enabled, and this was considered. The systemd.exec(5) manpage
states that the AppArmorProfile
Echoing Robie's question, and marking task as incomplete pending a test
plan update.
** Changed in: crun (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Still missing a jammy upload. The linked PR was approved just 2h ago,
though, so looks like it's close! :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052789
Title:
AppArmor profiles missing in
The jammy tests are still failing. gvfs is known to be flaky, but this
is a bit too much. I triggered a migration-reference/0 run.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046994
Title:
The verification of the Stable Release Update for openshot-qt has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
Thank you for the extra verification.
I will also note that ovn on mantic is not available on the armhf
architecture, including the release pocket. I.e., mantic was released
without armhf binary builds of src:ovn, so this update is not
introducing a regression in that regard.
--
You received
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ovn has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apt has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apt has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
I retriggered the xenial autopkgtests which were denylisted for some
architectures.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2015420
Title:
motd: can't disable esm-related messages
To manage
The verification of the Stable Release Update for autopkgtest has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
The remaining dep8 systemd/ppc64el failure on jammy cleared after the
migration-reference/0 run also failed, expectedly.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051939
Title:
[SRU exception]
I see new runs of the patched systemd package in noble, and even though
tests-in-lxd is still failing, now the reason is not the patch failing
to apply, it's something else:
Starting autopkgtest-prepare-Rk7
4650s Created symlink /etc/systemd/system/serial-getty@getty.service →
/dev/null.
4656s
The test failure on armhf persists:
939s # Running test: mutter-13/fullscreen-maximize.test
940s # Executing: mutter-13/fullscreen-maximize.test
941s # FAIL: mutter-13/fullscreen-maximize.test (Child process exited with code
1)
941s not ok - mutter-13/fullscreen-maximize.test
--
You received
The test failure on armhf persists:
939s # Running test: mutter-13/fullscreen-maximize.test
940s # Executing: mutter-13/fullscreen-maximize.test
941s # FAIL: mutter-13/fullscreen-maximize.test (Child process exited with code
1)
941s not ok - mutter-13/fullscreen-maximize.test
--
You received
Public bug reported:
sssd is currently failing to build on armhf due to build-time test
failures[1]¨:
[ RUN ] test_pam_preauth_expired_crl_file
[ ERROR ] --- No entries for symbol sss_dp_get_account_recv.
../src/tests/cmocka/common_mock_resp_dp.c:52: error: Could not get value to
mock
I think your attach command happened during a downtime of the Pro
service:
["2024-03-20T16:11:17.029", "DEBUG", "ubuntupro.http", "readurl", 389,
"URL [POST] response:
https://contracts.canonical.com/v1/context/machines/token, headers:
{'connection': 'close', 'content-length': '186',
Please only mark it as "fix released" in Ubuntu after it has left
-proposed, and reached the release pocket. After upload, it's correct to
mark it as "fix committed" (which normally happens automatically).
** Changed in: landscape-client (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
--
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~spencerrunde/ubuntu/+source/landscape-client/+git/landscape-client/+merge/462459
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057976
Title:
** Tags added: server-todo
** Changed in: isc-kea (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack)
** Changed in: isc-kea (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
src:ubuntu-advantage-tools version 31 introduced[1] an apparmor profile
to the apt-news service. It's known that some ubuntu systems do not have
apparmor enabled, and this was considered. The systemd.exec(5) manpage
states that the AppArmorProfile
The deadlock in pkcs11-provider was fixed by upstream via
https://github.com/latchset/pkcs11-provider/pull/356/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2050017
Title:
[FFe] [24.04 FEAT]
** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
src:ubuntu-advantage-tools version 31 introduced[1] an apparmor profile
to the apt-news service. It's known that some ubuntu systems do not have
apparmor
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
src:ubuntu-advantage-tools version 31 introduced[1] an apparmor profile
to the apt-news service. It's known that some ubuntu systems do not have
apparmor enabled, and this was considered. The systemd.exec(5) manpage
states that the AppArmorProfile
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
src:ubuntu-advantage-tools version 31 introduced[1] an apparmor profile
to the apt-news service. It's known that some ubuntu systems do not have
apparmor enabled, and this was considered. The systemd.exec(5) manpage
states that the AppArmorProfile
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
- * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and
+ src:ubuntu-advantage-tools version 31 introduced[1] an apparmor profile
+ to the apt-news service. It's known that some ubuntu systems do not have
+ apparmor enabled, and this was considered. The
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and
+
+ * justification for backporting the fix to the stable release.
+
+ * In addition, it is helpful, but not required, to include an
+explanation of how the upload fixes this bug.
+
+ [
** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack)
** Also affect
> Correct, apparmor is not installed and never was.
Interesting, because it seems to be enabled. The systemd service would
not have failed to load the apparmor profile if apparmor were
disabled[1]:
This setting has no effect if AppArmor is not enabled.
Do you have the
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+git/openssh/+merge/462619
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058276
Title:
Improve ssh-gssapi
Assignee: Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack)
Status: In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058276
Title:
Improve ssh-gssapi DEP8 test
To manage notifications about t
** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057937
Title:
apt-news.service reporting errors after
You seem to have apparmor enabled, but not the apparmor package
installed, is that it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057937
Title:
apt-news.service reporting errors after
Hi Erik,
please show the output of the following commands:
a) systemctl cat apt-news.service
b) ls -la /etc/apparmor.d/ubuntu*
c) sudo aa-status
d) dpkg -l ubuntu-advantage-tools ubuntu-pro-client ubuntu-pro-
client-l10n
e) python3 --version
f) sudo apparmor_parser -r -W -T
> Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack)
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Mantic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053146
Title:
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
- * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and
+ The gssapi-keyex authentication mechanism has been inadvertently broken
+ in openssh. It comes from a distro patch[1], and while the patch still
+ applied, it was no longer correct.
- *
** Description changed:
- The Authmethod struct now have 4 entries but the initialization of the
- method_gsskeyex in the debian/patches/gssapi.patch only have 3 entries.
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and
+
+ * justification for backporting the fix to
I just looked at the changes, and I would prefer to have a new SRU bug
for those, yes please.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2029473
Title:
Backport Ubuntu Pro to Xenial
To manage
Ah, software-properties, sorry, I still had update-manager in my mind.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2029473
Title:
Backport Ubuntu Pro to Xenial
To manage notifications about this
Queued where? I don't see it in xenial unapproved. If it's just fixing
the autopkgtests, not the software-properties code or anything else in
debian/*, then no need for a new SRU bug. Just make sure to build it
with the appropriate -v parameter to include all changes since
0.96.20.10 (IIRC).
--
Hello Robie, or anyone else affected,
Accepted update-manager into xenial-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-
manager/1:16.04.21 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Robert, or anyone else affected,
Accepted update-manager into xenial-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-
manager/1:16.04.21 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
I see 1:16.04.21 is in xenial unapproved, and it fixes the above crash.
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
** Tags removed: verification-done-xenial
** Tags added: verification-needed-xenial
--
You received this bug notification because
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected,
Accepted update-manager into xenial-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-
manager/1:16.04.21 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected,
Accepted update-manager into xenial-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-
manager/1:16.04.21 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Sebastien, or anyone else affected,
Accepted update-manager into xenial-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-
manager/1:16.04.21 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
I mistakenly released this for xenial without noticing there are DEP8
errors in that ubuntu release. For some reason, they were not added as a
comment to this bug, I suppose it has something to do with xenial being
very much out of standard support.
In any case, the errors are:
256s autopkgtest
Version 0.96.20.10 passed in xenial/amd64 about 10 days ago (via an
ubuntu-advantage-tools update), but version 0.96.20.12 failed a few days
before. I triggered another run just in case.
If that new run also fails, then something is going on, and it has to be
sorted out before this update can be
The verification of the Stable Release Update for powerpc-utils has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
The verification of the Stable Release Update for update-manager has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
** Description changed:
Impact
--
LP:1990450 introduced Ubuntu Pro updates and news to update-manager, but
also a bug whereby updating update-manager itself while update-manager
is running replaces its UI files with a version incompatible with the
already running handle of
The verification of the Stable Release Update for nova has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
comment #17 stated that noble and mantic have the patch, so I'm marking
the noble (devel) task as fix released.
** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
The verification of the Stable Release Update for update-manager has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
The verification of the Stable Release Update for update-manager has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
The verification of the Stable Release Update for python2.7 has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
> If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
> mentioning the version of the
> package you tested,
Hi everyone who tested, thank you for the verification!
But please please, state the version of the package you used. Just
saying "in jammy-proposed" is not specific
The verification of the Stable Release Update for sysdig has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Note that I saw that sysdig failed to build on riscv64, but it's not a
regression: the release version was also an FTBFS in riscv64.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051270
Title:
701 - 800 of 11569 matches
Mail list logo
