[Bug 1749289] Re: Installer stops after pressing Cancel on Select a language screen during OEM install

2018-09-26 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Yes, definitely. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1749289 Title: Installer stops after pressing Cancel on Select a language screen during OEM install To manage notifications about

[Bug 1749289] Re: Installer stops after pressing Cancel on Select a language screen during OEM install

2018-09-24 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Micheal: yes, that is expected after the patch has been applied. I just filled the gaps the installer was expecting. Before the config just died with AttributeError caused by calling a unimplemented method. Hence, my understanding was that this is the original intention. Simply hiding the cancel

[Bug 1793485] Re: segfault in png to gif conversion

2018-09-20 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "SH_HL_08_Step1_F029.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/+bug/1793485/+attachment/5190922/+files/SH_HL_08_Step1_F029.png ** Description changed: Regression between 8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.9 and 8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.12. Test case: 1. Download the

[Bug 1793485] [NEW] segfault in png to gif conversion

2018-09-20 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Public bug reported: Regression between 8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.9 and 8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.12. Test case: 1. Download the attached pngs. 2. Run: /usr/bin/convert -limit memory 512MiB -limit map 0MiB -limit file 10 -delay 16 -loop 0 -coalesce -deconstruct ./*.png ./output.gif Expected result: Process

[Bug 1786933] Re: New upstream release 3.28.x

2018-09-20 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I have just verified it and don't see any issues. I tested all use cases listed in the description on metal and in a VM (VirtualBox). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786933 Title:

[Bug 1786933] Re: New upstream release 3.28.x

2018-09-20 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786933 Title: New upstream

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-17 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Michael, I've just tried again today. I have up waiting after 60 minutes. How long does it take in your case? FWIW I used a vm (kvm) for testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789920

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-11 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "questions.dat" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1789920/+attachment/5187542/+files/questions.dat -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789920

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-11 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "templates.dat" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1789920/+attachment/5187543/+files/templates.dat -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789920

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-11 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
As advised by xnox I have retried the installation with adding apt- setup/proposed=true. The result was identical - after rebooting to perform the oem configuration the boot process stucks. Attaching installer logs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-11 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "lsb-release" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1789920/+attachment/5187539/+files/lsb-release -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789920

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-11 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "initial-status.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1789920/+attachment/5187540/+files/initial-status.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-11 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "status" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1789920/+attachment/5187536/+files/status -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789920 Title:

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-11 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "media-info" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1789920/+attachment/5187538/+files/media-info -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789920

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-11 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "hardware-summary" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1789920/+attachment/5187541/+files/hardware-summary -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-11 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "syslog" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1789920/+attachment/5187535/+files/syslog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789920 Title:

[Bug 1789920] Re: Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-09-11 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "partman" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1789920/+attachment/5187537/+files/partman -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789920 Title:

[Bug 1749289] Re: Installer stops after pressing Cancel on Select a language screen during OEM install

2018-08-30 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Reported bug #1789920. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1749289 Title: Installer stops after pressing Cancel on Select a language screen during OEM install To manage notifications

[Bug 1789920] [NEW] Installation in OEM mode broken on bionic

2018-08-30 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Public bug reported: I have downloaded the 18.04.1 iso with alternative (legacy) installer. I took the following steps: 1. Booted from the ISO (using BIOS, haven't tested EFI). 2. F4 -> set the OEM mode. 3. Proceed through the initial setup. 4. Agree to reboot for the OEM setup. 5. Observe

[Bug 1749289] Re: Installer stops after pressing Cancel on Select a language screen during OEM install

2018-08-30 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Hello Łukasz, I was not able to verify this on bionic. The boot stucks even before I had the chance to install the -proposed version of ubiquity. Steps I took: 1. Use the alternative iso with legacy installer. 2. F4 -> set OEM mode 3. Go through the initial setup. 4. Reboot to perform the OEM

[Bug 1749289] Re: Installer stops after pressing Cancel on Select a language screen during OEM install

2018-08-28 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Description changed: [Impact] Pressing Cancel during Ubuntu 16.04.3 Server installation after OEM install and after running oem-config-prepare aborts the installation. The behaviour is different from a regular Ubuntu 16.04.3 Server installation (without OEM) where the option at

[Bug 1782152] Re: GDM blocks SIGUSR1 used in PAM scripts

2018-08-22 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Verified on xenial with 3.18.3-0ubuntu2.2. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1782152] Re: GDM blocks SIGUSR1 used in PAM scripts

2018-08-21 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Verified on bionic with 3.28.3-0ubuntu18.04.1. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782152 Title: GDM

[Merge] ~dgadomski/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+git/lp1782152:unblock-sigusr1 into ~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/gdm3:ubuntu/bionic

2018-08-15 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Dariusz Gadomski has proposed merging ~dgadomski/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+git/lp1782152:unblock-sigusr1 into ~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/gdm3:ubuntu/bionic. Commit message: [ Alberto Milone ] * ubuntu_nvidia_prime.patch: - Run scripts for Prime before and after Gdm sessions (LP: #1778011

[Bug 1782152] Re: GDM blocks SIGUSR1 used in PAM scripts

2018-08-14 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Seb, Xenial is also affected (as long as the user switches to gdm) and this patch fixes it, so it's worth having it. I already talked to Eric (slashd) about it - he's going to drive it forward. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Merge] ~dgadomski/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+git/lp1782152:bionic into ~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/gdm3:ubuntu/bionic

2018-08-14 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Dariusz Gadomski has proposed merging ~dgadomski/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+git/lp1782152:bionic into ~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/gdm3:ubuntu/bionic. Commit message: [ Alberto Milone ] * ubuntu_nvidia_prime.patch: - Run scripts for Prime before and after Gdm sessions (LP: #1778011). [ Dariusz

[Bug 1782152] Re: GDM blocks SIGUSR1 used in PAM scripts

2018-08-02 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Although I originally shared Daniel's doubt, I reported it to Debian and shared the patch (bug linked above). ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #905277 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=905277 ** Also affects: gdm3 (Debian) via

[Bug 1749289] Re: Installer stops after pressing Cancel on Select a language screen during OEM install

2018-08-01 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
xnox: sadly there was a misunderstanding - I didn't take any actions about it since the merge request was marked "on hold", but I hit some issues with the installer after removing fcntl.ioctl(0, termios.TIOCSCTTY, 1) The terminal debconf tools were failing without it. I came up with 2 other

[Bug 1721988] Re: Ubuntu 17.10 full disk encryption + Nvidia drivers not booting

2018-07-27 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** No longer affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-384 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1721988 Title: Ubuntu 17.10 full disk encryption + Nvidia drivers not booting To manage

[Bug 1721988] Re: Ubuntu 17.10 full disk encryption + Nvidia drivers not booting

2018-07-27 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Thanks @goingwc, I have managed to reproduce it here so I can use my own plymouth log. Turns out I couldn't get even 18.04 working correctly, because I had integrated GPU enabled in my motherboard settings (i7-6700K with HD 530) despite nvidia being set to "primary GPU". I had to disable the

[Bug 1721988] Re: Ubuntu 17.10 full disk encryption + Nvidia drivers not booting

2018-07-24 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Hi, Could anyone that has it working on 18.04 add plymouth:debug to their kernel cmdline, reboot and share the /var/log/plymouth-debug.log? I'm looking into this, but also experience the issue on 18.04. I'm curious where the difference comes from. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1782152] Re: GDM blocks SIGUSR1 used in PAM scripts

2018-07-23 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for Xenial. ** Patch added: "xenial_gdm3_3.18.3-0ubuntu2.2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1782152/+attachment/5166679/+files/xenial_gdm3_3.18.3-0ubuntu2.2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1782152] Re: GDM blocks SIGUSR1 used in PAM scripts

2018-07-23 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for Bionic. ** Patch added: "bionic_gdm3_3.28.2-0ubuntu1.4.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1782152/+attachment/518/+files/bionic_gdm3_3.28.2-0ubuntu1.4.debdiff ** Description changed: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/issues/399 - --- +

[Bug 1782152] Re: GDM blocks SIGUSR1 used in PAM scripts

2018-07-23 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Patch for Cosmic. ** Patch added: "cosmic_gdm3_3.28.2-3ubuntu2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1782152/+attachment/517/+files/cosmic_gdm3_3.28.2-3ubuntu2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1782152] Re: GDM blocks SIGUSR1 used in PAM scripts

2018-07-23 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I confirm - the issue is gone after testing a build with the upstream patch applied. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782152 Title: GDM blocks SIGUSR1 used in PAM scripts To manage

[Bug 1782152] Re: GDM blocks SIGUSR1 used in PAM scripts

2018-07-18 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "session.py" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1782152/+attachment/5164919/+files/session.py -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782152 Title:

[Bug 1782152] Re: GDM blocks SIGUSR1 used in PAM scripts

2018-07-18 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Updated scripts for the reproducer. ** Attachment removed: "auth.py" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1782152/+attachment/5164561/+files/auth.py ** Attachment removed: "session.py"

[Bug 1782152] Re: GDM blocks SIGUSR1 used in PAM scripts

2018-07-18 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Upstream bug: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/issues/399 (not adding via "also affects projects" since LP does not parse gitlab bugtracker yet). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1782152] Re: GDM blocks SIGUSR1 used in PAM scripts

2018-07-18 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
apport-collect 1782152 replies with "No additional information collected" message. But this issue is reproducible with any clean bionic desktop install (since GDM needs to be the login managed). It is NOT reproducible if I switch back to lightDM. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1782152] Re: GDM block SIGUSR1 used in PAM scripts

2018-07-17 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Attachment added: "session.py" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/1782152/+attachment/5164562/+files/session.py ** Summary changed: - GDM block SIGUSR1 used in PAM scripts + GDM blocks SIGUSR1 used in PAM scripts -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1782152] Re: GDM block SIGUSR1 used in PAM scripts

2018-07-17 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Adding scripts for reproducer. ** Description changed: In case of the following scenario: 1. PAM configured to run auth and session with pam_exec scripts synchronizing via SIGUSR1 2. Using GDM as the login manager causes SIGUSR1 never reaches the target scripts. Workaround: a) Use

[Bug 1782152] [NEW] GDM block SIGUSR1 used in PAM scripts

2018-07-17 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Public bug reported: In case of the following scenario: 1. PAM configured to run auth and session with pam_exec scripts synchronizing via SIGUSR1 2. Using GDM as the login manager causes SIGUSR1 never reaches the target scripts. Workaround: a) Use SIGUSR2 in the scripts. b) Comment out

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in unity-control-center

2018-05-25 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Changed in: unity-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => In Progress ** Changed in: hwdata (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1764668] Re: guest cleanup script fails to iterate

2018-04-23 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I have repeated the tests for the second part of patch as well - everything went as expected. Although I haven't been able to hit the undefined guest scenario before. I'll make a couple of attempts more. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1764668] Re: guest cleanup script fails to iterate

2018-04-17 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I can confirm. With the patch applied all guests are being shutdown correctly and the "Failed to determine state of guest" message is gone. Tested for PARALLEL=2, 5, 10 for 40 guests. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1688508] Re: libvirt-guests.sh fails to shutdown guests in parallel

2018-04-06 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I've just finished verification for the following versions: artful: 3.6.0-1ubuntu6.5 xenial: 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.21 No issues found in the scope of the test case (from the bug description). ** Tags removed: verification-needed-artful verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done-artful

[Bug 1688508] Re: libvirt-guests.sh fails to shutdown guests in parallel

2018-04-05 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Christian, works perfectly fine here as well (tested from the ppa). I notice the "Failed to determine..." messages, but nonetheless the guests are correctly shut down in a jiffie. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information about display shown in unity-control-center

2018-03-15 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
After examining raw EDID data from 2 different LG TVs I can see that both of them set bytes 21 and 22 of the EDID data in a wrong way. They both state that the display size is 160x90 cm which in turn corresponds to a approximately 72" diagonal. So unity-settings-daemon does its job correctly

[Bug 1749289] Re: Installer stops after pressing Cancel on Select a language screen during OEM install

2018-03-14 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Seems that oem-config-firstboot ignores the question that should be presented to the user on unfinished installation, because of the following line in /usr/bin/ubiquity: 125: fcntl.ioctl(0, termios.TIOCSCTTY, 1) It steals the terminal from the calling script, so the question is not presented

[Bug 1688508] Re: libvirt-guests.sh fails to shutdown guests in parallel

2018-03-13 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
log from verification on Xenial. ** Attachment added: "xenial_libvirt-guests.log.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1688508/+attachment/5078252/+files/libvirt-guests.log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information displayed in unity-control-center

2018-03-13 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Goldstar seems to be a former name of LG (before the Lucky-Goldstar merge). I've made a pull request upstream to update it: https://github.com/vcrhonek/hwdata/pull/1 ** Also affects: unity-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug

[Bug 1755490] [NEW] Incorrect information about display shown in unity-control-center

2018-03-13 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Public bug reported: After connecting a LG 49UB850T-DA TV the following information is displayed in the unity-control-center: Goldstar Company Ltd 72" It's misleading since neither the company name nor the diagonal matches. ** Affects: hwdata (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status:

[Bug 1755490] Re: Incorrect information displayed in unity-control-center

2018-03-13 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Another thing is the diagonal length calculation. From my quick look this is done based on EDID data in unity-settings-daemon. ** Summary changed: - Incorrect information displayed in unity-control-center + Incorrect information about display shown in unity-control-center -- You received this

[Bug 1688508] Re: libvirt-guests.sh fails to shutdown guests in parallel

2018-02-26 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for Xenial. ** Patch added: "xenial_libvirt_1.3.1-1ubuntu10.20.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1688508/+attachment/5063490/+files/xenial_libvirt_1.3.1-1ubuntu10.20.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1688508] Re: libvirt-guests.sh fails to shutdown guests in parallel

2018-02-26 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for Artful. ** Patch added: "artful_libvirt_3.6.0-1ubuntu6.4.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1688508/+attachment/5063489/+files/artful_libvirt_3.6.0-1ubuntu6.4.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1688508] Re: libvirt-guests.sh fails to shutdown guests in parallel

2018-02-26 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu Zesty) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1688508 Title: libvirt-guests.sh fails to shutdown guests in parallel To

[Bug 1688508] Re: libvirt-guests.sh fails to shutdown guests in parallel

2018-02-23 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
The patch has been accepted upstream: https://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=ff02d1af4041ea4cf6bea68aac66d93a970e92f1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1688508 Title:

[Bug 1748122] Re: incorrect tools.conf template is shipped with Ubuntu

2018-02-21 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Verified Trusty 2:9.4.0-1280544-5ubuntu6.4. Works as expected. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-trusty ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-trusty ** Tags removed: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1748122] Re: incorrect tools.conf template is shipped with Ubuntu

2018-02-20 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Turns out Trusty config requires a path to logfile explicitly stated in tools.conf as there is no code for figuring out a default path in that version. Uploading new SRU proposal for Trusty. ** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: Fix Committed => In Progress ** Tags

[Bug 1748122] Re: incorrect tools.conf template is shipped with Ubuntu

2018-02-20 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Managed to successfully verify the following: artful - 2:10.1.10-3ubuntu0.1 - OK xenial - 2:10.0.7-3227872-5ubuntu1~16.04.2 - OK ** Tags removed: verification-needed-artful verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done-artful verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug

[Bug 1644662] Re: Icons missing when appearance setting is "high contrast"

2018-02-20 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I have just verified this in my env earlier used to reproduce the issue. Results: artful - 3.22.3-1ubuntu2 - verified xenial - 3.18.0-2ubuntu2 - verified ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-artful verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done

[Bug 1748122] Re: incorrect tools.conf template is shipped with Ubuntu

2018-02-15 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for Trusty. ** Patch added: "trusty_open-vm-tools_9.4.0-1280544-5ubuntu6.3.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/1748122/+attachment/5055673/+files/trusty_open-vm-tools_9.4.0-1280544-5ubuntu6.3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1748122] Re: incorrect tools.conf template is shipped with Ubuntu

2018-02-15 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for Artful. ** Patch added: "artful_open-vm-tools_10.0.7-3227872-5ubuntu1~17.10.1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/1748122/+attachment/5055676/+files/artful_open-vm-tools_10.0.7-3227872-5ubuntu1~17.10.1.debdiff -- You received this bug

[Bug 1748122] Re: incorrect tools.conf template is shipped with Ubuntu

2018-02-15 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for Xenial. ** Patch added: "xenial_open-vm-tools_10.0.7-3227872-5ubuntu1~16.04.2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/1748122/+attachment/5055674/+files/xenial_open-vm-tools_10.0.7-3227872-5ubuntu1~16.04.2.debdiff -- You received this bug

[Bug 1748122] Re: incorrect tools.conf template is shipped with Ubuntu

2018-02-12 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Christian, debian has merged the proposal [1]. I believe we're good to merge it to Ubuntu. Thanks! [1] https://github.com/bzed/pkg-open-vm- tools/commit/34538a58a8ed705e09f0dcf8c1627319efba49fd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1748122] Re: incorrect tools.conf template is shipped with Ubuntu

2018-02-08 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Of course. I will do that. Thanks Christian! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1748122 Title: incorrect tools.conf template is shipped with Ubuntu To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1644662] Re: Icons missing when appearance setting is "high contrast"

2018-02-08 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** No longer affects: unity-control-center (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: unity-control-center (Ubuntu Xenial) ** No longer affects: unity-control-center (Ubuntu Artful) ** No longer affects: unity-control-center (Ubuntu Bionic) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1748122] Re: incorrect tools.conf template is shipped with Ubuntu

2018-02-08 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Thanks for noticing that, wrong debdiff attached. Sorry about that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1748122 Title: incorrect tools.conf template is shipped with Ubuntu To manage

[Bug 1748122] Re: incorrect tools.conf template is shipped with Ubuntu

2018-02-08 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
This time the correct patch attached. ** Patch removed: "bionic_gnome-themes-standard_3.22.3-3ubuntu2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/1748122/+attachment/5051185/+files/bionic_gnome-themes-standard_3.22.3-3ubuntu2.debdiff ** Patch added:

[Bug 1748122] Re: incorrect tools.conf template is shipped with Ubuntu

2018-02-08 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #889884 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=889884 ** Also affects: open-vm-tools via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=889884 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1644662] Re: Icons missing when appearance setting is "high contrast"

2018-02-08 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Also affects: gnome-themes-standard (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: unity-control-center (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1748122] Re: incorrect tools.conf template is shipped with Ubuntu

2018-02-08 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
A more useful example based on the comment in open-vm- tools/lib/include/vmware/tools/log.h. ** Patch added: "bionic_gnome-themes-standard_3.22.3-3ubuntu2.debdiff"

[Bug 1748122] [NEW] incorrect tools.conf template is shipped with Ubuntu

2018-02-07 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Public bug reported: The tools.conf template shipped with Ubuntu (debian/local/tools.conf) is incorrect. It's current contents: bindir = "/usr/bin" do not mean anything to open-vm-tools - it's not interpreted in any way by vmtoolsd. Moreover, on the first launch this content is cleared by a

[Bug 1644662] Re: Icons missing when appearance setting is "high contrast"

2018-02-07 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for xenial. ** Patch added: "xenial_gnome-themes-standard_3.18.0-2ubuntu2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-control-center/+bug/1644662/+attachment/5051154/+files/xenial_gnome-themes-standard_3.18.0-2ubuntu2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1644662] Re: Icons missing when appearance setting is "high contrast"

2018-02-07 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for artful. ** Patch added: "artful_gnome-themes-standard_3.22.3-1ubuntu2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-control-center/+bug/1644662/+attachment/5051153/+files/artful_gnome-themes-standard_3.22.3-1ubuntu2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1644662] Re: Icons missing when appearance setting is "high contrast"

2018-02-07 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Patch for bionic. ** Patch added: "bionic_gnome-themes-standard_3.22.3-3ubuntu2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-control-center/+bug/1644662/+attachment/5051152/+files/bionic_gnome-themes-standard_3.22.3-3ubuntu2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1644662] Re: Icons missing when appearance setting is "high contrast"

2018-02-07 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
The fix has been merged upstream, preparing new debdiffs reflecting that. ** Patch removed: "xenial_gnome-themes-standard_3.18.0-2ubuntu2.debdiff"

[Bug 1746482] Re: mount.cifs stopped working with protocol version>1 and sec=ntlm

2018-02-05 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
After the preliminary analysis my understanding is as follows: since the change found thanks to the bisection the behaviour change in a way that if an unsupported security mode is requested it results in an error (invalid argument in this case). Looks like NTLM was not supported even before the

[Bug 1746482] Re: mount.cifs stopped working with protocol version>1 and sec=ntlm

2018-02-05 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Summary changed: - mount.cifs stopped working with protocol version != 1.0 + mount.cifs stopped working with protocol version>1 and sec=ntlm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1746482

[Bug 1746482] Re: mount.cifs stopped working with protocol version != 1.0

2018-02-05 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Bisecting between v4.10 and v4.11 resulted in finding that this was caused by the following commit: [ef65aaede23f75977af56a8c330bb9be8c6e125c] smb2: Enforce sec= mount option Reverting it on top of v4.11 makes it go away. Looking more into it. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1746482] Re: mount.cifs stopped working with protocol version != 1.0

2018-02-02 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Added updated dmesg (with verbose error message). ** Attachment added: "dmesg.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1746482/+attachment/5047510/+files/dmesg_latest.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1746482] Re: mount.cifs stopped working with protocol version != 1.0

2018-02-02 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Looks like I've been mislead by the man page of mount.cifs and linux/fs/cifs/connect.c which state: man mount.cifs: vers= SMB protocol version. Allowed values are: · 1.0 - The classic CIFS/SMBv1 protocol. This is the default. 4.13 kernel code: pr_warn("No dialect

[Bug 1746482] Re: mount.cifs stopped working with protocol version != 1.0

2018-02-02 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Conclusion after correcting the parameters in my test procedure: v4.10 - good v4.11 - bad v4.15 - bad I'm performing a bisect between v4.10 and v4.11. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1746482] Re: mount.cifs stopped working with protocol version != 1.0

2018-02-02 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Added updated dmesg (with verbose error message). ** Attachment added: "dmesg.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1746482/+attachment/5047511/+files/dmesg_latest.log ** Attachment removed: "dmesg.txt"

[Bug 1746482] Re: mount.cifs stopped working with protocol version != 1.0

2018-02-02 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Description changed: On a Xenial installation after upgrading to the HWE 4.13.0-32-generic kernel it is not possible to use mount.cifs with -o vers=x.y different than 1.0. Steps to reproduce: 1. Setup a local Samba share. 2. Run: - mount.cifs -o user=,vers=2.0

[Bug 1746482] Re: mount.cifs stopped working with protocol version != 1.0

2018-02-01 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Surprisingly it works perfectly fine for 4.15.0-041500-generic. I have tested vers= parameter from 1.0 to 3.0 - no issues at all. I went forward and tested v4.14 - it is not affected by the issue as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1746482] Re: mount.cifs stopped working with protocol version != 1.0

2018-01-31 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
dmesg output after reproducing the issue with echo 7 > /proc/fs/cifs/cifsFYI ** Attachment added: "dmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1746482/+attachment/5046387/+files/dmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1746482] Re: mount.cifs stopped working with protocol version != 1.0

2018-01-31 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
As discussed with cascardo I tested the mainline builds from [1]. After some tests the results were: v4.12.14 - good v4.13 - bad So the regression seems to be introduced in v4.13. [1] http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1746482] [NEW] mount.cifs stopped working with protocol version != 1.0

2018-01-31 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Public bug reported: On a Xenial installation after upgrading to the HWE 4.13.0-32-generic kernel it is not possible to use mount.cifs with -o vers=x.y different than 1.0. Steps to reproduce: 1. Setup a local Samba share. 2. Run: mount.cifs -o user=,vers=2.0 //localhost/theshare/ /mnt/theshare

[Bug 1644662] Re: Icons missing when appearance setting is "high contrast"

2018-01-29 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
** Description changed: [Impact] - * Switching to HighContrast theme in System Settings/Appearance results in missing icons for some of the panels in System Settings. - * Only Xenial is affected of the currently supported releases. - * Current development release is not affected. +  *

[Bug 1644662] Re: Icons missing when appearance setting is "high contrast"

2018-01-29 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for Xenial. ** Description changed: + [Impact] + + * Switching to HighContrast theme in System Settings/Appearance results in missing icons for some of the panels in System Settings. + * Only Xenial is affected of the currently supported releases. + * Current development

[Bug 1644662] Re: Icons missing when appearance setting is "high contrast"

2018-01-29 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
The /usr/share/themes/HighContrast/index.theme sets Adwaita as the default icon theme for the HighContrast theme. Unfortunately some of the needed icons are missing. I wonder why the HighContrast icon theme is not used here by default? Another observation: as visible in David's screenshot there

[Bug 1644662] Re: Icons missing when appearance setting is "high contrast"

2018-01-29 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
The /usr/share/themes/HighContrast/index.theme sets Adwaita as the default icon theme for the HighContrast team. Unfortunately some of the needed icons are missing in that team. I wonder why the HighContrast icon theme is not used here by default? Another observation: as visible in David's

[Bug 1743422] Re: The launcher reveal doesn't always work when moving the pointer to the defined hot spot

2018-01-16 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I was also able to reproduce it on 17.10 _on metal_. For some reason the launcher hides for good and I was not able to display it again on VM (Virtualbox). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1741509] Re: Thunderbolt updates on Dell systems fail to apply if nothing connected

2018-01-15 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I've just finished testing version 0.9.7-2ubuntu1. With that version update finishes cleanly. Thanks! ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-artful ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-artful -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1720627] Re: Segfault when using docker and overlay2

2017-12-12 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
I've just verified that the segfault is fixed in the following releases: bionic: 11.6.0-1ubuntu2 artful: 11.5.7-1ubuntu2 zesty: 11.4.3-1ubuntu1 xenial: 11.2.0-1ubuntu0.2 ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-artful verification-needed-xenial verification-needed-zesty ** Tags

[Bug 1720627] Re: Segfault when using docker and overlay2

2017-12-08 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
Looks like I can't link another debian bug in a regular manner, so adding the link here: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883863 I also shared the Ubuntu bionic patch with Debian. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #883863

[Bug 1720627] Re: Segfault when using docker and overlay2

2017-12-06 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for Zesty. ** Patch added: "zesty_sysstat_11.4.3-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysstat/+bug/1720627/+attachment/5019350/+files/zesty_sysstat_11.4.3-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1720627] Re: Segfault when using docker and overlay2

2017-12-06 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for Artful. ** Description changed: [Impact] - * With long entries in mtab tools utilizing the get_filesystem_nr and read_filesystem functions cause a segfault due to a fact that they don't +  * With long entries in mtab tools utilizing the get_filesystem_nr and

[Bug 1720627] Re: Segfault when using docker and overlay2

2017-12-06 Thread Dariusz Gadomski
SRU proposal for Xenial. ** Patch added: "xenial_sysstat_11.2.0-1ubuntu0.2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysstat/+bug/1720627/+attachment/5019351/+files/xenial_sysstat_11.2.0-1ubuntu0.2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >