** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
update manager should warn about laptop running on battery when installing big
updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377697
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Problem is solved according to bug reporter.
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
Update Manager
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373330
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
Useless computer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376553
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: compiz
1. Minimize a window.
2. Detach laptop from docking station and thus from external monitor. X display
gets resized and things moved around.
3. Suspend. and resume. (This may be irrelevant.)
4. Re-attach laptop to docking station and external
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26669111/BootDmesg.gz
** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26669112/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26669113/Dependencies.txt
**
I'm not the originator, but I am the person Manoj refers to in comment
#30. I've tested the kernel from -proposed (linux-
image-2.6.28-12-generic version 2.6.28-12.43), and it works for me.
--
kernel does not recognize Western Digital Caviar SE WD3200AAJS 320GB 7200 RPM
SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive
Since the actual contents of the file are already there, there's no
point in requiring Bill to re-upload it, even if it is more convenient
for the developers to deal with attached files.
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
Update Manager
Since the evolution process doesn't actually segfault, I'm not sure at
what point the stacktrace should be taken. By the time the calendar
component tells me it is dead, it's too late already.
--
evolution's calendar crashes: calendar-gui-Message: Error occurred while
existing dialog active:
Installing libical from jaunty-proposed fixes my problem, though, and I
can now access my calendar (libical0_0.43-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb).
--
evolution's calendar crashes: calendar-gui-Message: Error occurred while
existing dialog active:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369660
You received this bug
http://files.liw.fi/temp/usb-creator.remaining-time
the above bzr branch has the beginnings of a remaining time estimator.
It is not entirely complete: I only hooked it up to one place where I/O
happens, and it needs to be hooked to every place.
** Changed in: usb-creator (Ubuntu)
Status:
I noticed that my script to start synergyc still had the xset
workarounds. I removed them, and re-tested, and it's still fixed. This
is with both client and server running jaunty.
Thus I declare this as fixed. If anyone still has this problem in
jaunty, please re-open!
** Changed in: synergy
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26167052/Dependencies.txt
--
evolution's calendar crashes: calendar-gui-Message: Error occurred while
existing dialog active:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369660
You received this bug notification because you are a
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: evolution
This morning, evolution's calendar started crashing. This happens every
time I restart evolution, even after pkill evolution. If I run it from
the command line, the terminal gets this:
calendar-gui-Message: Error occurred while existing dialog
The dates program can access my calendars, except the two Google ones
that require authentication (I suspect dates can't handle that).
--
evolution's calendar crashes: calendar-gui-Message: Error occurred while
existing dialog active:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369660
You received this bug
Hi, aleix. This problem is almost certainly due to the
es.archive.ubuntu.com site not being up to date with the Ubuntu
packages, or having some other problems. You could wait a few days or
try another mirror, and it should work fine.
I'll mark this bug closed. If you think that's wrong, and I'm
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 285746 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285746
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 285746
System cleaner removes explicitly installed third-party packages
--
computer-janitor recommends remove frostwire
ti, 2009-04-28 kello 18:51 +, Kevin Baxtor kirjoitti:
I'm not sure how to run a memory test through the terminal, though my
sysinfo tells me that I have 692 MiB of which 380 is being used.
To run a memory test, reboot and press ESC at the GRUB countdown (after
BIOS checks, before kernel is
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnomescan
When I try to scan a page using the Automatic Document Feeder on my HP
Laserjet 3052 multi-function device (printer, scanner), over the net
backend of SANE, it gets the page, but then fails to end the scan when
there is no other page. It
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26029403/Dependencies.txt
--
flegita does not complete scan from ADF
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367979
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Marking this as fix released as per bug reporter's latest comment.
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Fix Released
--
jaunty update failed with 'package authentication error'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367515
You received this bug notification because you
ma, 2009-04-27 kello 09:41 -0400, Mackenzie Morgan kirjoitti:
On Monday 27 April 2009 1:51:51 am Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Flegita doesn't find my scanner, which is attached to another computer,
and shared across the network with the net backend of SANE.
I didn't know XSane could do
I'm afraid that what Windows does is not a relevant yardstick. If you
have specific instances of where computer-janitor does something wrong
and does not warn the user they might be doing something dangerous,
please report them.
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
su, 2009-04-26 kello 21:41 -0500, solaris manzur kirjoitti:
i agree about replacing xsane by gnome-scan
Are we talking about flegita? (There is no gnome-scan package in jaunty,
and I can't find a command by that name.)
Flegita doesn't find my scanner, which is attached to another computer,
and
I see this too. I wonder where the error message went. I'll investigate
and get this fixed soon.
--
computer-janitor incomplete error description
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365325
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Manoj, the linux-
image-2.6.28-11-generic_2.6.28-11.43~lp257790manjo1_amd64.deb kernel
works for me.
--
kernel does not recognize Western Digital Caviar SE WD3200AAJS 320GB 7200 RPM
SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive (2nd generation)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257790
You received this bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 332945 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 332945
[Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information
--
update manager starts, no notification icon on jaunty
This is probably due to the fact that Ubuntu released today and all
mirrors are under extreme loads. If you try again in a day or so, it
should work.
(If that hypothesis is correct, the real bug here is that Ubuntu is too
popular. I'm not sure we want to fix that.)
--
Upgrading to 9.04 went for
The Kubuntu version of the installer seems to have pretty wide password
fields, even under kvm.
--
ubiquity field for user passwords should be wider
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I'll note that the randomness doesn't seem to be happening now. It's
always the same configuration: panels on the left monitor. Which is the
opposite of what I want, but at least I can live with it as long as it
doesn't keep changing.
--
GNOME (panel?) chooses monitor for panels randomly
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
The Kubuntu OEM installer's end user setup dialog has a weird layout:
the list of steps on the left is huge and this makes the contents of the
rest of the window seem cramped.
** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
** Attachment added: Kuvakaappaus.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25844922/Kuvakaappaus.png
--
Kubuntu OEM installer's end user setup dialog layout is weird
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364997
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
Computer Janitor complains that package dash is missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Zbigniew Chyla, if you're not using Synergy, you're almost certainly
experiencing another bug. Please file it separately, this will help the
developers keep track of it and get it fixed.
--
left and down arrow key won't repeat
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281546
You received this bug
pe, 2009-04-17 kello 08:18 -0500, DB Cummings kirjoitti:
Hello,
I would like to assist with documentation for Cruft Remover
(system-cleaner-gtk). May I be of assistance?
Certainly. Any documentation should be written against the jaunty
version, which is called Computer Janitor (packages
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
On the 5/7 page of the ubiquity installer, it asks for a username and
password. The password fields seem to be 8 characters wide. My test
passwords are longer (password1), and this results in a tiny bit of
confusion. A real user would probably
Plain old Ubuntu, the GTK frontend. Say, jaunty-desktop-amd64.iso from
the ubuntu directory on cdimage. I'm doing this under KVM, so the screen
size is not very big, perhaps that matters.
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
ubiquity field for user passwords
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: openoffice.org-voikko
openoffice.org-voikko's postinst calls
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/unopkg, but the package has no direct or
indirect dependency on openoffice.org-common, which contains unopkg.
This prevents installation from Ubuntu DVD in Finnish.
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25826764/Dependencies.txt
--
openoffice.org-voikko is missing a dependency on openoffice.org-common
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364654
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 332945 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 332945
[Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information
--
no update-manager applet after Jaunty upgrade
computer-janitor already attempts to detect and report the dpkg lock.
Could you tell me in which order you started c-j and synaptic? Did
synaptic run first? Did you do something in synaptic while running c-j?
Did you run the GUI version of c-j or the command line version?
--
computer-janitor
I've made a custom version of the jaunty alternate installer based on
instructions at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/InstallCDCustomization
so now I can truly confirm that everything works.
It is too late to include this in the jaunty release, but perhaps it can
be included in a point release.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: debian-installer
I've just done a test install of jaunty server amd64, just the basic
default install. Everything went well, but the system was using 720
megabytes of disk. After I ran 'apt-get clean', it only used 664
megabytes. I think it would be
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: evolution
This has happened to me a few times now, after upgrading to jaunty:
* suspend laptop in the evening
* resume laptop in the morning
* network-manager thinks it's still online
* evolution's mail fetching timer goes off
* evolution sees that NM
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25808456/Dependencies.txt
--
evolution forgets POP3 passwords if it tries to connect while offline
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364432
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Right. I didn't have this with intrepid, only after I upgraded to
jaunty. Since this is unlikely to be fixed for the jaunty release, let's
continue after the release, when I will have more time to do test scans.
Ping me then, please.
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: debian-installer
I tried to make a custom jaunty alternate ISO today, following
instructions at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/InstallCDCustomization
. The ISO I made works, except that it fails to get networking up
automatically. Colin Watson, a
Works fine with scanadf and scanimage on the command line.
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
The scanimage.pl and scanadf.pl commands also result in good scans from
the command line on the jaunty computer with scanner attached directly
to it.
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this
Also works fine with scanadf and scanimage on the command line when
scanner is attached directly to machine running jaunty.
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this bug notification because
On closer look, no they don't. scanadf.pl produces a slightly distorted
image from the command line when scanner is attached directly. Also over
the net.
Summary of results:
Works: scanner is attached to either machine, accessed locally or over
the net, using scanadf or scanimage.
Doesn't work:
** Description changed:
cvs checkout returns within the same second that the Entries files contain,
this
leads to missed commits, when scripts are performing operations on fast
machines.
+
+ ** See below for a test case. (Bug triagers especially: run the test
+ before changing status. This
The patch in the upstream bug
(http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11579) fixes my problem. In
order for me to use my disks, I'll need an installer that includes this
fix, though.
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #11579
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11579
--
The images I've uploaded were scanned with gscan2pdf, which I've
configured to run unpaper. If I scan things from the command line,
there's still distortion, so unpaper is not relevant.
scanadf doesn't give me a setting for bit depth. It gives me --mode,
with options color, gray, and lineart. No
** Attachment added: scanadf.pl scan, grayscale, from command line
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25613620/scanadf-pl-jaunty-net-gray.pnm.lzma
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this bug
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25613299/Dependencies.txt
--
gnome-terminal opens tabs with wrong working directory when using man
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362880
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-terminal
Ubuntu version: up-to-date jaunty.
When I open a new tab in gnome-terminal (using shift-control-t), it
attempts to open the new tab int he same working directory as the old
one. If I am reading a manpage, the new tab opens up in
scanadf.pl with lineart still distorts. A top-left partial scan (lineart
or color) doesn't distort, but since the distortion happens in bands,
that's not really conclusive. Since using scanadf works for me, I'm not
really motivated doing a few more dozen scans and inspecting them for
distortion,
I can now reproduce it as well, using today's version of the live cd
(amd64). I have no idea what causes this, yet, and it's not important
enough to fix for jaunty, but I'll look into this for karmic.
--
computer-janitor opens two tasks when starting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350286
You
I'll do the following:
* start gscan2pdf
* choose frontend
* scan the same piece of paper (at 75 dpi)
* save scan as ppm
* gzip ppm
* attach scan to this bug report
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
** Attachment added: scanadf
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25532987/scanadf-75.pnm.lzma
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Attachment added: scanadf.pl
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25533006/scanadf-pl-75.pnm.lzma
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Attachment added: scanimage
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25533021/scanimage-75.pnm.lzma
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Attachment added: scanimage.pl
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25533027/scanimage-pl-75.pnm.lzma
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Summary of results:
- scanadf and scanimage frontends work OK
- scanadf.pl and scanimage.pl frontends don't work
I don't know if this is specific to the model of the scanner.
In case it matters: the scanner is not physically attached to the
computer, but to another computer, running Debian
Ricardo,
how did you get update-manager there? The source says
computerjanitor.
** Summary changed:
- Some strings shows untranslated, albeit they're translated (patch supplied)
+ Some strings shows untranslated, albeit they're translated
--
Some strings shows untranslated, albeit they're
The reason the translations are not used is because the GTK UI is
failing to call gettext in one place.
--
Some strings shows untranslated, albeit they're translated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361312
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Ah, now I see: the file you patched belongs to update-manager-core. The
proper translation domain for that file is indeed update-manager, not
computerjanitor.
--
Some strings shows untranslated, albeit they're translated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361312
You received this bug notification
Specifically, the problem is as follows:
* Part of the computer-janitor code is in the update-manager source
package. This is necessary so that u-m can use c-j plugins. This code
uses the update-manager translation domain.
* The rest of the computer-janitor code is in the computer-janitor
Oh, and additionally some of the plugins in computer-janitor are using
the wrong gettext instance. I'll fix that as well.
--
Some strings shows untranslated, albeit they're translated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361312
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Committed
--
Some strings shows untranslated, albeit they're translated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361312
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 361312 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361312
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 361312
Some strings shows untranslated, albeit they're translated
--
I have still not been able to reproduce this, even on real hardware. I
suspect it is computer-janitor-gtk doing something bad when starting up
that interferes with the interaction with the window manager, which
prevents the window manager from realizing that the window is already
up. I have no
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
Request for freeze exception for computer-janitor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354529
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
Missing files from POTFILES.in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351595
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
some english phrases aren't right I think
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342907
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
rumandfruit, does it still occur to you? If it does, could you attach
the output of the commands dpkg --status dash and apt-cache policy
dash?
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
Computer Janitor complains that package dash is missing
** Attachment added: Full diff of all changes in new version
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25498439/diff.txt
--
Freeze exception for computer-janitor 1.12.1-0ubuntu3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
, and then putting back the whole
description string again. (Closes: LP: #361312, #358354)
-- Lars Wirzenius l...@ubuntu.com Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:22:01 +0300
** Affects: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Freeze exception for computer-janitor 1.12.1-0ubuntu3
** Attachment added: xrandr --query output
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25501169/xrandr.log
--
gnome-display-properties doesn't let me use external monitor's full resolution
in mirror mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357694
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The above gnome-settings-daemon log is probably useless. I can't switch
modes (resolutions?) using fn-f7: this is a desktop machine, so no fn
key.
--
gnome-display-properties doesn't let me use external monitor's full resolution
in mirror mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357694
You received
** Attachment added: (silly) gnome-settings-daemon log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25501201/gsd.log
--
gnome-display-properties doesn't let me use external monitor's full resolution
in mirror mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357694
You received this bug notification because you are a
There is no libc6-v9v package (on amd64, in jaunty, as of today).
--
gcc-4.3 ftbfs if libc6-v9v is installed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I'm now running jaunty. I haven't had a repeat of the bug since a while
now, even with flash installed. It used to happen every day, sometimes
many times a day. I suspect the bug has been fixed, unless whatever
triggered it no longer happens in my feeds. I'll let it be for a while,
but if no-body
Public bug reported:
I have two identical monitors attached to my desktop machine. There does
not seem to be a way for me to tell GNOME that I want the panels on the
right monitor and not the left one. Sometimes it puts them on one,
sometimes on the other.
I tried to fix this by swapping the
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = New
--
Computer Janitor complains that package dash is missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gscan2pdf
I have an HP Laserjet 3052 printer/scanner/fax. When scanning with
gscan2pdf on jaunty, using default settings, the image is distorted.
With the scanadf frontend (see Edit/Preferences) it works. scanadf works
on this printer even when not using
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25200683/Dependencies.txt
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Attachment added: Page scanned with scanimage.pl frontend
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25202187/scanimage.pl.pdf
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this bug notification because you
** Attachment added: Same page scanned with scanadf frontend
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25202362/scanadf.pdf
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this bug notification because you are a
Both the above pages were scanned of the same page, with a huge hand-
written A on it. The scan quality is not great, but the shape of the
distorted page should be visible anyway.
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: metacity
I have focus mode in metacity set to strict. In intrepid, this meant
that new windows that popped up immediately would get focus, but if I
was doing something else they would not. A typical scenario is with the
browser: I might click on a link
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25015078/Dependencies.txt
--
metacity new window has/hasn't focus usually wrong
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357688
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-control-center
My laptop has a 10.6 inch screen (1280*768). At home, I have a 22 inch
external screen (1680*1050) attached to it. gnome-display-properties
does not let me set things up so that the screens are mirrored, and the
resolution is set to
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25015322/Dependencies.txt
--
gnome-display-properties doesn't let me use external monitor's full resolution
in mirror mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357694
You received this bug notification because you are a member
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 337241 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337241
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 337241
I do not want to remove '/'
--
computer-janitor actions are unclear
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355543
You received this bug notification because
I'm using the stock GTK+ list widget for this, and the default way in
which it works is that you have to select the actual tickbox once and
then moving up and down with arrow keys and ticking/unticking with space
works. I thought update-manager did the same thing, but now I see that
it's doing
computer-janitor reports the error message it gets from dpkg, and it
handles and reports explicitly locking, too. (I just verified that.)
Sometimes package installs or (especially) removals fail silently, but
temporarily, because of maintainer scripts, and I suspect this was one
of those cases.
Mirroring means, or used to mean and should mean, that the two screens
show the same thing. Before, the laptop screen would show only as much
as would fit into the top left corner of the full resolution. This is
good for me because when I unplug the external monitor, the screen has
useful stuff on
The code in sysklogd, file ksym.c, seems to be looking for a symbol
Version_[0-9]+ in all System.map-$version files it knows. However, the
Ubuntu map files don't seem to include that symbol.
--
sysklogd cannot find map file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277924
You received this bug
ma, 2009-04-06 kello 15:24 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia kirjoitti:
Unless you can _guarantee_ that every upgrade will NOT harm the system
As you point out, it is not possible to guarantee that. However, it is
probably best to point out that not upgrading can also harm things, when
it is about
301 - 400 of 826 matches
Mail list logo
