[Bug 989595] Re: package fglrx-updates (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-removal ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2012-04-27 Thread Luke12
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989595 Title: package fglrx-updates (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-removal ha restituito lo stato

[Bug 989595] [NEW] package fglrx-updates (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-removal ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2012-04-27 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: I am trying to remove all lingering configurations. Fresh upgrade 11.10-12.04 this morning (no alpha/beta/RC packages installed). ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: fglrx-updates (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14

[Bug 871185] Re: blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1: blcr kernel module failed to build

2011-10-09 Thread Luke12
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871185 Title: blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1: blcr kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 871185] [NEW] blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1: blcr kernel module failed to build

2011-10-09 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: General update on Oneiric, morning of 09 october. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.19-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl fglrx ApportVersion:

[Bug 767653] [NEW] package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2011-04-20 Thread Luke12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 767498 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767498 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apport Updating as of today 20 April, 22:23 Greenwhich+1 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature:

[Bug 767653] Re: package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2011-04-20 Thread Luke12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 767498 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767498 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767653 Title: package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to

[Bug 767651] [NEW] package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2011-04-20 Thread Luke12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 767498 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767498 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apport Updating as of today 20 April, 22:23 Greenwhich+1 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature:

[Bug 767651] Re: package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2011-04-20 Thread Luke12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 767498 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767498 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767651 Title: package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to

[Bug 767650] [NEW] package apport-gtk 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: problemi con le dipendenze - lasciato non configurato

2011-04-20 Thread Luke12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 767498 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767498 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apport Updating as of today 20 April, 22:23 Greenwhich+1 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: apport-gtk 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature:

[Bug 767650] Re: package apport-gtk 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: problemi con le dipendenze - lasciato non configurato

2011-04-20 Thread Luke12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 767498 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767498 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767650 Title: package apport-gtk 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to

[Bug 758625] [NEW] package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build

2011-04-12 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: Update on the 12th of April. All packages up to date. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.41-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl fglrx

[Bug 758625] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build

2011-04-12 Thread Luke12
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/758625 Title: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 640452] [NEW] package winbind 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2010-09-16 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Title says it all. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: winbind 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-21.31-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl AptOrdering:

[Bug 640452] Re: package winbind 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2010-09-16 Thread Luke12
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640452/+attachment/1593182/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640452/+attachment/1593188/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt

[Bug 640449] [NEW] package samba 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2010-09-16 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Since yesterday (15/9), when I tried to upgrade (Maverick Beta), samba installation has been broken for me. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: samba 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-21.31-generic

[Bug 640449] Re: package samba 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2010-09-16 Thread Luke12
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640449/+attachment/1593142/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640449/+attachment/1593143/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt

[Bug 640459] [NEW] package checkbox-gtk 0.10.3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2010-09-16 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: checkbox Failed update. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: checkbox-gtk 0.10.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-21.31-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl AptOrdering: man-db:

[Bug 640459] Re: package checkbox-gtk 0.10.3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2010-09-16 Thread Luke12
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640459/+attachment/1593246/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640459/+attachment/1593247/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt

[Bug 640458] [NEW] package man-db 2.5.7-4 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2010-09-16 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: man-db Failed update. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: man-db 2.5.7-4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-21.31-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl AptOrdering: man-db: Configure

[Bug 640458] Re: package man-db 2.5.7-4 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2010-09-16 Thread Luke12
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640458/+attachment/1593242/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640458/+attachment/1593243/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt

[Bug 640452] [NEW] package winbind 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2010-09-16 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Title says it all. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: winbind 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-21.31-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl AptOrdering:

[Bug 640452] Re: package winbind 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2010-09-16 Thread Luke12
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640452/+attachment/1593182/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640452/+attachment/1593188/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt

[Bug 640449] [NEW] package samba 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2010-09-16 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Since yesterday (15/9), when I tried to upgrade (Maverick Beta), samba installation has been broken for me. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: samba 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-21.31-generic

[Bug 640449] Re: package samba 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2010-09-16 Thread Luke12
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640449/+attachment/1593142/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640449/+attachment/1593143/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt

[Bug 450795] Re: trackerd causes the death of pdftotext and odt2txt processes with signal 24

2010-08-23 Thread Luke12
As far as I reckon, no. I have not seen this problem in a while. -- trackerd causes the death of pdftotext and odt2txt processes with signal 24 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 414794] Re: ibus-x11 crashed with signal 5 in __libc_start_main()

2010-03-27 Thread Luke12
I have been running into this bug for a while now. Every session start, I see apport signaling that ibus has crashed. Currently, the only anomaly I observe is that I cannot absolutely choose a desktop background in gnome, and end up with a plain grey background (same color as the panel). **

[Bug 351220] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104

2009-10-19 Thread Luke12
MM. Forgot to follow up this bug after a while. Taylor, I discovered that the message indicated that the swap was corrupted (probably due to some kind of error or maybe disk damage, I can't tell that from here ;-) ). You should format your swap, and correct the right configuration files in etc

[Bug 451112] Re: pdftotext crashed with signal 24 in Lexer::getObj()

2009-10-17 Thread Luke12
I fear I cant', sorry, it is a rather big file (over 100 Mb). Anything else I could do? -- pdftotext crashed with signal 24 in Lexer::getObj() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 446653] Re: Random crash

2009-10-09 Thread Luke12
I beg your pardon, but I think the right package is nvidia-glx-185, not 180 :) -- Random crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446653 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 446653] [NEW] Random crash

2009-10-08 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg Xorg crashed during a normal session, up for less than 12 hours. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Oct 8 21:14:51 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 MachineType: Dell Inc. MM061 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: xorg 1:7.4+3ubuntu5

[Bug 446653] Re: Random crash

2009-10-08 Thread Luke12
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320466/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320467/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320468/Dependencies.txt **

[Bug 349330] Re: Cannot receive files over bluetooth: install gnome-user-share by default

2009-09-13 Thread Luke12
Does this bug still affect Karmic? -- Cannot receive files over bluetooth: install gnome-user-share by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349330 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 269904] Re: Screen refresh problems with nvidia on intrepid

2009-06-19 Thread Luke12
Rob_H is absolutely right. I came across the solution yesterday night, and lo and behold, it is finally perfect! :-) -- Screen refresh problems with nvidia on intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269904 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

Re: [Bug 332414] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV

2009-06-12 Thread Luke12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 131679 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131679 Ditto. It was an unpleasant surprise, especially because most of these notifications concern simply change of status and merges. Il giorno ven, 12/06/2009 alle 05.49 +, Rajeev Sharma ha scritto: ***

[Bug 351204] Re: [Dell Inc. MM061] suspend/resume failure [non-free: nvidia]

2009-04-15 Thread Luke12
Is there some critical information which is missing from this bug report and which I failed to provide? -- [Dell Inc. MM061] suspend/resume failure [non-free: nvidia] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 356059] [NEW] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104

2009-04-06 Thread Luke12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 351220 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351220 Public bug reported: See duplicate ProblemType: KernelOops Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be restarted. Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Failure: oops

[Bug 356059] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104

2009-04-06 Thread Luke12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 351220 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351220 ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24854365/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24854366/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 351220] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104

2009-04-06 Thread Luke12
After some observations, I think I can say this bug happens after resuming from suspend. A typical symptom is the impossibility of actually act as administrator. See new duplicate. -- BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351220 You received

[Bug 354320] [NEW] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104

2009-04-03 Thread Luke12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 351220 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351220 Public bug reported: Duplicate of bug 351220. Opening a new one to add the extra information, after latest kernel update. Thought it was gone, I was mistaken, it is just less reproducible. :( Running an

[Bug 354320] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104

2009-04-03 Thread Luke12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 351220 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351220 ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24738290/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24738291/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 351220] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104

2009-04-03 Thread Luke12
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = New -- BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 351220] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104

2009-04-03 Thread Luke12
Happened again. It is just less consistent. I added the new debug information to the duplicate of this bug. -- BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 351204] Re: [Dell Inc. MM061] suspend/resume failure [non-free: nvidia]

2009-04-02 Thread Luke12
Ok, in order: 1- Bug hit at resume time 2- Not consistently reproducible, or frequent - I suspend and hibernate many times a day, and this bug affects the system seldom, at resuming from suspend. In the last 3 days it occurred twice, and a reasonable estimate would be that in the meantime I

[Bug 351220] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104

2009-04-02 Thread Luke12
I consistently received this bug notifications every time I booted up, but after today's kernel upgrade the warning has disappeared. Thanks to whoever fixed it :-) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104

[Bug 351204] [NEW] [Dell Inc. MM061] suspend/resume failure [non-free: nvidia]

2009-03-29 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: I (stupidly) re-inserted the CD-tray just one second after having started up the suspend test script (checkbox). ProblemType: KernelOops Annotation: This occured during a previous suspend and prevented it from resuming properly. Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04

[Bug 351204] Re: [Dell Inc. MM061] suspend/resume failure [non-free: nvidia]

2009-03-29 Thread Luke12
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492014/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492015/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492017/Dependencies.txt **

[Bug 351220] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104

2009-03-29 Thread Luke12
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492451/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492452/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492453/Dependencies.txt **

[Bug 351220] [NEW] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104

2009-03-29 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: Testing Suspend-resume ProblemType: KernelOops Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be restarted. Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Failure: oops MachineType: Dell Inc. MM061 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package:

[Bug 278488] Re: Network Manager 0.7 is unable to determine if the connection is local only or instead provides internet access

2009-01-15 Thread Luke12
The problem was still there last time I tried in Intrepid. I will be able to verify it tomorrow. I have just enabled the ppa archive, so next time I will be reporting I will be using the most up-to-date version available there. -- Network Manager 0.7 is unable to determine if the connection is

[Bug 308334] Re: firestarter and samba not working together

2009-01-06 Thread Luke12
This also happens while using Gufw. I had to shut the firewall down in order to get samba working again. I will try to see if these lines can help solve the problem permanently, thanks. -- firestarter and samba not working together https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308334 You received this bug

[Bug 291511] [NEW] Nautilus-gksu should be included by default in Ubuntu; better yet, it should be merged with nautilus package

2008-10-31 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: This is obviously a wish. Argument pro-inclusion: right now users have no way but resorting to command-line to open a file or a folder as super-user. This can be cirvumvented by using cli, of course, but it is far form an ideal solution. It is obviously a risk to give such

Re: [Bug 263059] Re: [regression] 2.6.27-7 sometimes fails to boot (iwl3945 issue?)

2008-10-17 Thread Luke12
Again sorry for a me not post; using a 64 bit kernel here I have no problems. Cannot say for a 32 bit kernel though. You can find my lspci output in earlier comments. Il giorno ven, 17/10/2008 alle 13.23 +, Tim Gardner ha scritto: The i3945 part of this bug is a red herring. It also happens

[Bug 263059] Re: [regression] 2.6.27-7 sometimes fails to boot (iwl3945 issue?)

2008-10-16 Thread Luke12
Not very useful, but I'd like to add a I am NOT affected by this bug comment. I use a Dell Inspiron 6400, Nvidia Driver, IWL3945, and I have been using Intrepid both from live cd and as my default OS for two weeks now. I have never had any problem at boot time, and actually this driver is at its

[Bug 192629] Re: Cannot move file to trash, do you want to delete immediately? on NTFS / VFAT partitions

2008-10-16 Thread Luke12
There is a hackish solution for this, without having to go into the fstab, at least in Intrepid. THIS ONLY WORKS WITH INTERNAL NTFS DRIVES. First, mount the ntfs drive by clicking it in Nautilus. Once you've done this, go to computer:/// in nautilus, right click on the drive, and go into the

Re: [Bug 263059] Re: [regression] 2.6.27-7 sometimes fails to boot (iwl3945 issue?)

2008-10-16 Thread Luke12
Neither do I actually; I have not experienced this bug either with nv driver or the nvidia one. I am attaching here my lspci -nn. As for the kernel version, I am using the last one provided, which is 2.6.27-7-generic. I have all the available updates repositories enabled. Il giorno gio,

[Bug 269083] Re: gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()

2008-10-13 Thread Luke12
I confirm the bug on an amd64 box. Hope you get it solved soon (and wahoo for the investigation above :) ) -- gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 262152] Re: brings up both wired and wireless interfaces; hard to pick just one through the UI

2008-10-10 Thread Luke12
I think bug 278485 is related. NM seems in general unable to handle well more than one connection at a time. -- brings up both wired and wireless interfaces; hard to pick just one through the UI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262152 You received this bug notification because you are a member

Re: [Bug 278488] Re: Network Manager 0.7 is unable to determine if the connection is local only or instead provides internet access

2008-10-07 Thread Luke12
This has all been verified with Hardy. If the problem with my wireless network will go on until friday, I will be able to test this also with Intrepid. Step 1: I connect to the house wireless network, which currently provides local access only, using NM 0.7 Step 2: Still using NM 0.7, I connect

[Bug 273633] Re: Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks

2008-10-06 Thread Luke12
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions

2008-10-06 Thread Luke12
And *drums roll* it is finally over! I am happily writing this comment using a Beta CD, connected to the campus wireless network. Kudos and thanks to everyone who helped solve this heinous bug! ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- The new IWL driver for Linux

[Bug 278485] [NEW] If Ubuntu is connected to more than one network (e.g. GSM and wireless) but only GSM has internet access, OS is unable to access internet. NM version 0.7.

2008-10-05 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: Using NM 0.7 in Hardy (via ppa). I stumbled upon this bug as I am currently without DSL access and have to resort to my GSM connection (through a vodafon modem). The wireless network also allows me to access other computers in the network, so even without internet access

[Bug 278488] [NEW] Network Manager 0.7 is unable to determine if the connection is local only or instead provides internet access

2008-10-05 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager As in description. My DSL currently does not work, so the access my wireless network provides in local-only. NM 0.7 (via ppa) is unable to discriminate the two statuses. Release used: Hardy .1 Desired behaviour: as in Windows, where the

Re: [Bug 273633] Re: Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks

2008-10-05 Thread Luke12
Dear Andy, I am trying this out tomorrow. If it functions, let me just tell you that - you're DA MAN!! :-) I've been plagued by this bug for so long that it seems forever right now. Il giorno dom, 05/10/2008 alle 15.41 +, Andy ha scritto: Seems I found the solution to my problem here:

Re: [Bug 273633] Re: Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks

2008-10-03 Thread Luke12
gio, 02/10/2008 alle 22.22 +, Alexander Sack ha scritto: Luke12, this looks like a bug in iwl3945 driver or wpasupplicant maybe. On another front: what _wired_ chipset/driver are you using? NM spits out 'NULL(info.linux.driver)' which usually means that the driver has a bug

[Bug 273633] Re: Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks

2008-10-02 Thread Luke12
Still not solved in Beta. Tested both on Hardy via ppa and a 64-bit Intrepid live. -- Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 273633] Re: Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks

2008-09-24 Thread Luke12
Ok, here is the syslog (produced according the rules provided inside the guide). It was produced in Hardy, up-to-date compat wireless driver and NM 0.7. I will try to make the same for Intrepid in some hours. Chipset: Intel Pro-Wireless 3945 Driver: IWL3945 (compat-wireless-old) System: Ubuntu

[Bug 273633] Re: Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks

2008-09-24 Thread Luke12
Here is the syslog generated using a vanilla Intrepid alpha 6 live cd. Hope this is enough, if not please ask! :-) ** Attachment added: syslog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17919677/syslog -- Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks

[Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions

2008-09-23 Thread Luke12
Confirmed in alpha 6 using a live cd today. Opening a new bug. -- The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 273633] [NEW] Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks

2008-09-23 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager This is not a duplicate of bug 209602. I am currently unable to connect to a WPA-encrypted network using Network-Manager. This has been verified both in Hardy (aasac's ppa, and compat-wireless), and with an Intrepid alpha 6 cd.

[Bug 254476] Re: python2.5 crashed with AttributeError in checkBatteryCritical()

2008-09-20 Thread Luke12
Also happened at logon after boot, entering directly into KDE. Using a VirtualBox installation, it now works, yay :-) -- python2.5 crashed with AttributeError in checkBatteryCritical() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254476 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions

2008-09-17 Thread Luke12
I confirm the UI bug with both compat-wireless and network-manager 0.7 up-to-date. Should this bug (regarding the driver) be closed and a new one (regarding network-manager) be opened? -- The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209602 You

[Bug 270089] [NEW] Knetworkmanager 0.7 does not allow to connect to a GSM network, in general is poorer than GNOME counterpart

2008-09-14 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: I am using aasac's ppa to use Network-manager 0.7 in hardy, but AFAIK this problem exists also in Intrepid. Shortly, nm-applet allows to connect to a very broad range of networks, ranging from classical wired or wireless to gsm or VPN. I, for example, use this functionality

[Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions

2008-09-11 Thread Luke12
Ok, a bunch of news for this bug. Namely, it does support the encryption of my campus network, but there seems to be some incompatibility issues among the driver, Network Manager, and the dhcp client used by Ubuntu (dhclient). I am able to connect shutting down NetworkManager, killing dhclient and

[Bug 257403] Re: Update Flash plugin 10 to the new RC

2008-09-11 Thread Luke12
+1 also for me. For user experience in Ubuntu, Flash 10 is many steps above Flash 9 (for example, often Flash 9 would stop loading some videos or applets). On the other hand, beta 2 is unusable - I experienced many Firefox crashes due to it. So I hope it gets updated soon :) In the meantime,

[Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions

2008-09-08 Thread Luke12
Ok, I tried the alpha with the new kernel today. The bug is NOT fixed: while I can connect using the ipw driver in hardy, the same settings in the alpha do not allow for the connection to be established. If there is some particular testing I can do to spread some light on the matter, please do

[Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions

2008-09-08 Thread Luke12
Even worse news: I tried the most up-to-date compat wireless drivers (old version for kernels 2.6.27, 07 september) and with those drivers connection still did not function. Bug not fixed upstream I fear. :-( I am notifying the intel developers right now. -- The new IWL driver for Linux does not

[Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions

2008-09-01 Thread Luke12
Update: using Compat Wireless drivers (latest updated 6th of August) does not fix the problem. Indeed, they actually crash keyboard using after resume from suspend. I will try with Alpha 5 live cd next week. -- The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions

Re: [Bug 145674] Re: pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

2008-08-29 Thread Luke12
I have not experienced this bug in a long time now - wheter with 2.43 or 2.5 which I have installed some days ago through getdeb. Fixed as far as I know :-) Il giorno ven, 29/08/2008 alle 18.02 +, Andreas Moog ha scritto: Is this still an issue for you? Could you also try with version 2.4.3

Re: [Bug 145674] Re: pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

2008-08-29 Thread Luke12
Will remember that, in any case I am not the original submitter - hope it is fixed for her/him, I do not see anything in the comments :-) Il giorno ven, 29/08/2008 alle 23.50 +, Andreas Moog ha scritto: This bug report is being closed due to your last comment regarding this being fixed. For

Re: [Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions

2008-08-28 Thread Luke12
Dear Ogasawara, I am doing that right now. I have no chance to really test the wireless bug until next week (when I will be back on campus) but I can surely point to any other problems coming my way. Luckily this will be not the first time I install (and eventually

[Bug 259004] Re: keyboard was broken after today's update

2008-08-28 Thread Luke12
Confirmed. Keyboard functions out of Xorg, however, on the console terminal. Please fix this ASAP. -- keyboard was broken after today's update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions

2008-08-28 Thread Luke12
Well, what can I say, it was a complete disaster. First of all, the kernel stopped cold while booting after installation, at the Loading hardware drivers step. I deduced, correctly, that this happened because xserver-xorg packages where not up-to-date and configured to work with this kernel ... so

[Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions

2008-08-22 Thread Luke12
It seems that the problem has been fixed upstream. By monday I will try this out using both a live cd (Intrepid) and the compat-wireless drivers (Hardy). Let us hope Linux has got rid of this bug :-) -- The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions

[Bug 246301] Re: Update the FGLRX and NVIDIA driver to 8.6 and 173.14.09

2008-07-08 Thread Luke12
I have updated and I have been using the new driver since this morning. I am on a Hardy 32-bit box, using a GeForce 7300 (Dell notebook). It works reasonably well, seemingly with no improvements or regressions compared with the previous version. I however experienced a system freeze some hours

Re: [Bug 106621] Re: Gnome Trash doesn't show deleted files on ntfs-3g partitions

2008-05-04 Thread Luke12
Well, they did not technically eliminate the feature...rather they implemented it in a different way. But for the end user you are right: unless you know what to do, you're pretty much stuck. Could someone modify the ntfs-3g package so that the hack is directly implemented when the fstab is

[Bug 226200] [NEW] package linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-16-386 None failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso post-removal script ha restituito un codice di errore 1

2008-05-03 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: Uninstalled Linux - i386, now I am unable to complete remove this package. I daresay it does no more find files related to the i386 kernel and thus stops befuddled. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Sat May 3 19:03:35 2008 Dependencies: DistroRelease: Ubuntu

[Bug 226200] Re: package linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-16-386 None failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso post-removal script ha restituito un codice di errore 1

2008-05-03 Thread Luke12
** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14172807/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-16-386 None failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso post-removal script ha restituito un codice di errore 1

Re: [Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions

2008-04-29 Thread Luke12
Hi Leann, no problem at all. The patch will be released, when ready, at http://linuxwireless.sipsolutions.net/download/compat-wireless-2.6 /compat-wireless-2.6.tar.bz2 which is updated daily. However, to the best of my knowledge, they are still working on it. I tried the modules in this

[Bug 203793] Re: [hardy][iwl3945] 3945ABG cannot associate to public WPA2 PSK network

2008-04-25 Thread Luke12
The problem is not in Ubuntu, but rather in the main kernel. Details here: http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1507 Currently the developers are working on it. I guess that when the patch will be ready, it will be included in the linux or linux-backports packages...I hope.

[Bug 217760] [NEW] Under 64 bit architecture, no easy way to add a 32-bit archive to synaptic or apt

2008-04-15 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: I recently switched to a 64 bit environment, hoping to use at most my box. However, I recently found out that under 64 bit architecture, there is no way to easily add a 32-bit only repository or, for that, to install a 32-bit package graphically. It must be done from the

[Bug 216725] [NEW] compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV in eventLoop()

2008-04-13 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compiz Got very slow after resuming from suspend (other times it simply froze, leaving me no other option but cold reboot). This time I tried to restart it; it almost froze; I was barely able to get to the console, kill the processes, and then restart X.

[Bug 216725] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV in eventLoop()

2008-04-13 Thread Luke12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 131679 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131679 ** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13406514/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13406515/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added:

[Bug 216175] [NEW] jockey-gtk crashed with AttributeError in enabled()

2008-04-12 Thread Luke12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 214914 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214914 Public bug reported: Crashed while opening, no other operation in progress. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Apr 12 09:28:51 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath:

[Bug 216175] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with AttributeError in enabled()

2008-04-12 Thread Luke12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 214914 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214914 ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13375347/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Devices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13375349/Devices.txt ** Attachment added:

Re: [Bug 214914] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with AttributeError in enabled()

2008-04-12 Thread Luke12
Fixed confirmed as functioning. Nice to see it up and running again ;-) PY ha scritto: thanks for the solution and to twist2be !!! the fix works very well -- jockey-gtk crashed with AttributeError in enabled() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214914 You received this bug notification because

Re: [Bug 215005] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with AttributeError in enables_composite()

2008-04-11 Thread Luke12
My guess. They introduced some kind of bug in jockey, which is now the program which cares for detecting if a closed video driver is available and needed/installable. This program does more than it looks; it not only cares for installing the packages, but actually configures the whole system

[Bug 212795] [NEW] pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch()

2008-04-06 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pidgin Cannot identify the crash reason. It would be nice if there was a way to automatically add the information gathered by apport even when subscribing to existing bugs, instead of having to file a new one for the information to be attached.

[Bug 212795] Re: pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch()

2008-04-06 Thread Luke12
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13146692/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13146693/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13146694/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 201462] Re: nautilus-gksu stopped working in hardy

2008-04-06 Thread Luke12
Workaround confirmed as working for me. Why has it not become standard in the Ubuntu packages? :-/ -- nautilus-gksu stopped working in hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201462 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 212179] [NEW] gnome-screensaver crashed with SIGSEGV in cairo_translate()

2008-04-05 Thread Luke12
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-screensaver Just coming back from X restart. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Apr 5 12:19:35 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-screensaver NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: gnome-screensaver

  1   2   >