Re: Replacing the telegram-desktop deb by a snap installer in stable series?

2023-02-24 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 24/02/2023 12:18, Robie Basak wrote: I don't know. Sorry I don't have time to go into this right now. But the current situation seems worse, given that an automatic transition to an "external" snap, without prompting, goes against the principle that the TB already has consensus on. But,

Re: isc-dhcp: should we start phasing it out?

2022-05-16 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 16/05/2022 18:34, Andreas Hasenack wrote: Could we perhaps start with phasing out the client, get its rdeps to use alternatives, and then stop building it, and eventually get to the server? This could be a lot of work, as I said, isc-dhcp is a classic, but if upstream is shifting its focus

Re: Change unattended-upgrades from Depends to Recommends on ubuntu-server-minimal

2022-01-12 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
LXD images called "Ubuntu Server" should behave as similarly as possible to bare metal images called "Ubuntu Server". Unless there is a documented technical reason for the delta, I suspect the difference is a consequence of org boundaries and should be revisited. There is definitely a need

Re: Revisiting default initramfs compression

2021-12-09 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 08/12/2021 23:02, Julian Andres Klode wrote: I'd kind of like us to ship "default" initramfs in like linux-initrd-$uname-r and linux-initrd-generic and so on. Maybe even signed somehow so that the kernel can verify its integrity when booting. Such that booting with authenticated FDE is fully

Re: [Bug 48734] Re: Home permissions too open

2021-01-18 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 18/01/2021 12:46, Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote: > This bug was fixed in the package adduser - 3.118ubuntu5 > > ** Changed in: adduser (Ubuntu Hirsute) >Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released \o/ Well done and thank you to everyone who worked to make this happen. I wonder if there

Re: Ubuntu on the M1 chip

2020-12-19 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 18/12/2020 20:16, Matthias Klose wrote: > Installed Ubuntu 20.10 server (couldn't find an arm64 desktop iso, are we only > shipping Pi images?). Something tells me that will have to change :) Mark -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe

Re: [Bug 1131664] Re: The default apps should have standard menubars under Unity

2020-08-28 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 28/08/2020 22:19, vexorian wrote: > Maybe Gnome developers and Canonical can live in a pretend world where a > Hamburger menu is a remotely-acceptable UX in A DESKTOP OS, but for > those of us who use Ubuntu professionally this design is just not > practical. You are of course entirely

Re: [Bug 1870087] Re: Old broker lockfile blocks landscape-client starts

2020-08-28 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Just to say thank you for progressing this :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870087 Title: Old broker lockfile blocks landscape-client starts To manage notifications about this bug

Re: Communication Improvements/frustrations

2020-08-12 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
It has been an intense time for multiple groups, thank you both for being willing to pull this frayed thread back into the tapestry. The many flavours of Ubuntu are an important part of our story, and occasionally it helps to remind ourselves of that. Free software is great because it enables

Re: Communication Improvements/frustrations

2020-08-12 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
It has been an intense time for multiple groups, thank you both for being willing to pull this frayed thread back into the tapestry. The many flavours of Ubuntu are an important part of our story, and occasionally it helps to remind ourselves of that. Free software is great because it enables

[Bug 1870087] Re: Old broker lockfile blocks landscape-client starts

2020-06-20 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Removing broker.sock and broker.sock.lock allowed the client to start up cleanly. We definitely have not addressed this issue correctly or completely. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1870087] Re: Old broker lockfile blocks landscape-client starts

2020-06-20 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Hi folks, I am still seeing this issue intermittently in Ubuntu 20.04. $ sudo apt-cache policy landscape-client landscape-client: Installed: 19.12-0ubuntu4.1 Candidate: 19.12-0ubuntu4.1 Version table: *** 19.12-0ubuntu4.1 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates/main

[Bug 1664844] Re: No distinction between link-up and link-down interfaces

2020-06-06 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Is there an updated target release for the ability to describe configuration for an interface (such as name) but leave the interface down at boot? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1664844

Re: [Bug 1872964] Re: Reliable crash in lowlatency kernel with LXD

2020-04-24 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
OK, will circle back to this bug in due course. From what you say it might even be specific to that Nuc. Mark -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872964 Title: Reliable crash in

Re: [Bug 1872964] Re: Reliable crash in lowlatency kernel with LXD

2020-04-23 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Hi Seth I have been deploying charmed-kubernetes on a LXD cluster. I didn't think the kernel crash was workload-specific, but of course it might be. It looked more likely to be ZFS + lowlatency + snaps triggering the issue. For now I have had to move to -generic on the machine which was causing

[Bug 1870087] Re: Old broker lockfile blocks landscape-client starts

2020-04-22 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Hi folks, I think you need to reopen this bug. I just saw the issue again on several Focal machines. It's definitely not fix-released. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870087 Title:

[Bug 1872964] Re: Reliable crash in lowlatency kernel with LXD

2020-04-17 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Just to confirm and still seeing this with today's -24 package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872964 Title: Reliable crash in lowlatency kernel with LXD To manage notifications

Re: [Bug 1870087] Re: Old broker lockfile blocks landscape-client starts

2020-04-16 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
The update to landscape-client 19.12-0ubuntu4 failed on several of my servers. I apply updates via Landscape, so it might be a divide-by-zero issue with landscape failing to update itself cleanly. I did a widespread push of updates and saw several servers fail. When I ssh to the actual servers and

Re: [Bug 1870087] Re: Old broker lockfile blocks landscape-client starts

2020-04-15 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Thanks all, I will keep an eye on my systems to see if the issue goes away. It was triggered regularly on Focal machines so should be quite easy to spot if it comes back :). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1872183] Re: package chrony 3.2-4ubuntu4.2 failed to install/upgrade: installed chrony package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2020-04-15 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Just wanted to say thank you Vincent, Christian, and it's really great to see you working together this way! Mark -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872183 Title: package chrony

[Bug 1872964] [NEW] Reliable crash in lowlatency kernel with LXD

2020-04-15 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Public bug reported: Hello, I am able to crash 5.4.0-21-lowlatency running LXD. This machine in an Intel NUC, part of a three-member LXD cluster. The other machines do not show this crash and they are not running the lowlatency kernel, but that might be incidental. I will swap out the generic

[Bug 1872189] Re: Splitting graphical gpsd-clients into separate package would simplify headless installs

2020-04-12 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
gpsmon is the primary tool I use from the clients package, just to see that gpsd it tracking things properly and to see the PPS is active. Agree that gpsctl makes more sense in the gpsd package itself, if you think the same applies to the non-Python bits then the dependencies of gpsd might stay

[Bug 1872189] [NEW] Splitting graphical gpsd-clients into separate package would simplify headless installs

2020-04-11 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Public bug reported: gpsd-clients depends on gir1.2-gtk-3.0 which brings in a bunch of X dependencies, I think for xgps and xgpsspeed. If those were split into a separate package, perhaps gps-xclients or gps-clients-graphical, then headless systems could avoid the X dependencies. ** Affects:

[Bug 1872178] Re: GPSD unable to use Kernel PPS

2020-04-11 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
** Also affects: gpsd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: chrony (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872178 Title: GPSD unable to use

[Bug 1872183] Re: package chrony 3.2-4ubuntu4.2 failed to install/upgrade: installed chrony package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2020-04-11 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Upgrade from bionic to focal broke for this system which has chrony installed. After do-release-upgrade exited (warning that the system was in an indeterminate state) I was unable to fix the system initially. It seemed that systemd-timesyncd was somehow interacting badly with chrony: $ sudo apt

[Bug 1872183] [NEW] package chrony 3.2-4ubuntu4.2 failed to install/upgrade: installed chrony package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2020-04-11 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Public bug reported: Failed during bionic->focal upgrade ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: chrony 3.2-4ubuntu4.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-97.98-lowlatency 4.15.18 Uname: Linux 4.15.0-97-lowlatency x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.14 Architecture: amd64

[Bug 1872178] [NEW] GPSD unable to use Kernel PPS

2020-04-11 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Public bug reported: I am working with gpsd and a pulse-per-second (PPS) signal on a serial port. GPSD is able to detect the PPS signal but it is not able to use Kernel PPS for lower jitter. Here are the relevant log lines when PPS is being detected and enabled: gpsd:INFO: KPPS:/dev/ttyS0

[Bug 1872175] [NEW] gpsd unable to open chrony PPS socket

2020-04-11 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Public bug reported: GPSd fails to access the socket used to communicate PPS signals with Chrony. >From the startup log: gpsd:PROG: PPS:/dev/ttyS0 connect chrony socket failed: /var/run/chrony.ttyS0.sock, error: -2, errno: 13/Permission denied The socket in question has these permissions: $

[Bug 1869357] [NEW] package libreoffice-math 1:6.4.2-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/config/soffice.cfg/modules/smath/menubar/menubar.xml', which is

2020-03-27 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Public bug reported: Looks like a file has moved between packages which caused the dpkg error. The issue was resolved with "apt --fix-broken install" but nevertheless we should make sure nobody sees this on upgrade. Thanks! ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package:

Re: PHP 7.4 in Focal

2020-03-27 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 26/03/2020 18:47, Bryce Harrington wrote: > The in-archive transition from PHP 7.3 to PHP 7.4 is complete. I expect > PHP 7.3 will be removed from Focal soon. > > PHP 7.4 is a new feature update, bringing typed properties, arrow > functions, weak references, and unpacking inside arrays among

Re: [Bug 1868706] Re: Snapd postinst script hangs

2020-03-26 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Pawel, this is great debugging, thank you. Agree it's an edge case. Mark -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868706 Title: Snapd postinst script hangs To manage notifications about

[Bug 1868706] Re: Snapd postinst script hangs

2020-03-25 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
OK, so *now* the situation has cleared on that machine. And there are no snaps installed :/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868706 Title: Snapd postinst script hangs To manage

[Bug 1867431] Re: ERROR got an error from dpkg for pkg: 'libc6'

2020-03-14 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
@kai-mast I think grub is the only way, since both sudo and login are stuck under these circumstances. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867431 Title: ERROR got an error from dpkg for

[Bug 1867431] Re: ERROR got an error from dpkg for pkg: 'libc6'

2020-03-14 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
@jbouter you are a lifesaver. Or at least, a weekend-saver, thank you :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867431 Title: ERROR got an error from dpkg for pkg: 'libc6' To manage

[Bug 1867431] Re: ERROR got an error from dpkg for pkg: 'libc6'

2020-03-14 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Added another term.log, hope that's useful ** Attachment added: "term.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1867431/+attachment/5336953/+files/term.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1863410] Re: Old isc-kea-common package removal looks dangerous

2020-03-05 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Ah, thank you Andreas, that is a good catch. I believe the ISC maintains some .debs themselves, and it would be worth reaching out to see if they want to collaborate to avoid this sort of gotcha. They do have some additional commercial packages they would care about, and we should offer to

[Bug 1865309] [NEW] openssh-server removed during bionic->focal upgrade

2020-02-29 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Public bug reported: I tested do-release-upgrade -d on a few servers with simple setups. In both cases, openssh-server was removed. Given that the upgrader warned me about doing the upgrade over SSH, this was surprising :) I think we should whitelist openssh-server to ensure it stays installed

[Bug 1863100] Re: Move control sockets out of /tmp

2020-02-15 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Along with the move, please update the default configuration for /etc/kea/kea-ctrl-agent.conf to refer to the appropriate location -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863100 Title: Move

[Bug 1863410] Re: Old isc-kea-common package removal looks dangerous

2020-02-15 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Here is apt's term.log: Log started: 2020-02-15 11:52:34 (Reading database ... 138590 files and directories currently installed.) Purging configuration files for isc-kea-common (1.6.1-isc0042520191119145256) ... userdel: user _kea is currently used by process 1435 /usr/sbin/deluser:

[Bug 1863410] [NEW] Old isc-kea-common package removal looks dangerous

2020-02-15 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Public bug reported: I upgraded to kea 1.6 in Focal, and saw an old isc-kea-common package with configuration files. Removing that threw up a number of uncomfortable looking error messages about _kea user and group removal failing. I don't think our transition approach is yet clean. ** Affects:

Re: Call for nominations: Developer Membership Board

2020-02-08 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
I think public nominations might be more nerve-wracking for good candidates than inspiring. My sense is that we would benefit from more pro-active identification of people who 'do things the right way', and reach out to them directly. Often, good people don't think of themselves as leaders, they

Re: Call for nominations: Developer Membership Board

2020-02-07 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
I think public nominations might be more nerve-wracking for good candidates than inspiring. My sense is that we would benefit from more pro-active identification of people who 'do things the right way', and reach out to them directly. Often, good people don't think of themselves as leaders, they

[Bug 1809262] Re: Missing hooks library

2020-01-18 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Ran into this today, confirming. ** Changed in: isc-kea (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1809262 Title: Missing hooks library To manage

[Bug 1858347] Re: Wrong PID-File-Directory in /usr/sbin/keactrl in Ubuntu 20.04 LTS

2020-01-18 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
** Changed in: isc-kea (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858347 Title: Wrong PID-File-Directory in /usr/sbin/keactrl in Ubuntu 20.04 LTS To

[URGENT] Key Server license

2020-01-13 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
True. Please send bitcoins to this address if you can. Mark -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

[Bug 1839318] [NEW] Fresh 18.04.2 install has an odd launcher item 'Install RELEASE'

2019-08-07 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Public bug reported: After a fresh 18.04.2 desktop install, I have a curious item at the top of the launcher called 'Install RELEASE' which doesn't correspond to anything I was expecting or want on the system. Screenshot attached. ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

Re: [Bug 1710278] Re: [2.3a1] named stuck on reload, DNS broken

2019-07-10 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
OK, interesting. I really don't like the reloading strategy but am not sure that BIND gives us many better options. Let us know what you find. Mark -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1710278] Re: [2.3a1] named stuck on reload, DNS broken

2019-06-27 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 6/26/19 5:12 PM, Sam Lee wrote: > When I compare our v2.5.3 install from our v2.4.2 install, the amount of > rndc reloads is vastly more on v2.5.3. Hi Sam, I don't see these issues any more, on 18.04 and 2.6. I see reloads every few minutes on a stable MAAS (i.e. without a lot of activity).

Re: [Bug 1763608] Re: Netplan ignores Interfaces without IP Addresses

2019-05-24 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Sorry for the regression, and thanks for the detailed bug report. I'm sure a fix will be relatively quick and straightforward, but as an aside I would suggest that you run some machines on -proposed because that's where we cook changes to the deep plumbing, and this one was there for a reasonable

Re: New PPU uploader - Ross Gammon

2019-03-12 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 3/12/19 11:20 AM, Lukasz Zemczak wrote: > Please congratulate Ross on his successful PPU uploader application! Congrats Ross! Mark -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: [Bug 1818340] Re: systemd-networkd core dumps in bionic-proposed

2019-03-05 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Confirmed that 3ubuntu10.15 fixes the core-dump in systemd-networkd. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818340 Title: systemd-networkd core dumps in bionic-proposed To manage

Re: [Bug 1818340] Re: systemd-networkd core dumps in bionic-proposed

2019-03-05 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Just to let you know, I still see 237-3ubuntu10.14 in -proposed and I think that's the one that has the issue. Mark -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818340 Title: systemd-networkd

[Bug 1818340] Re: systemd-networkd core dumps in bionic-proposed

2019-03-04 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Apport info from an affected system is in #1818487 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818340 Title: systemd-networkd core dumps in bionic-proposed To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1818487] [NEW] systemd-networkd dumps core in bionic-proposed

2019-03-04 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1818340 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818340 Public bug reported: This is apport info for systemd related to #1818340 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: systemd 237-3ubuntu10.14 [modified:

Re: [Bug 1785816] Re: Consider enabling CONFIG_NETWORK_PHY_TIMESTAMPING

2019-03-04 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Timestamping seems to be working. However there may be other networking issues in -proposed that could be kernel related (captured in bug #1818340) that might warrant a hold on promotion. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1818340] Re: systemd-networkd core dumps in bionic-proposed

2019-03-02 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
I found that the bond seems not to have come up properly: $ sudo cat /proc/net/bonding/bond-lan Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011) Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation Transmit Hash Policy: layer2+3 (2) MII Status: down MII Polling Interval (ms): 100 Up

[Bug 1818340] Re: systemd-networkd core dumps in bionic-proposed

2019-03-02 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Taking the bond down and then bringing it back up again seemed to sort out the aggregation. I was able to assign an IP address to the bond and ping it. However, even with the bond sorted, restarting systemd-networkd dumps core. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1818340] Re: systemd-networkd core dumps in bionic-proposed

2019-03-02 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Further digging in journalctl shows: -- Unit systemd-networkd.service has begun starting up. Mar 02 20:37:00 4-ridge-fw1 systemd-networkd[6851]: bond-lan: netdev ready Mar 02 20:37:00 4-ridge-fw1 systemd-networkd[6851]: bond-net: netdev ready Mar 02 20:37:00 4-ridge-fw1 systemd-networkd[6851]:

[Bug 1818340] Re: systemd-networkd core dumps in bionic-proposed

2019-03-02 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Needless to say I suggest not promoting systemd from -proposed until this is figured out :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818340 Title: systemd-networkd core dumps in

[Bug 1818340] [NEW] systemd-networkd core dumps in bionic-proposed

2019-03-02 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Public bug reported: I run a number of servers with -proposed enabled and have seen a bunch of this today: Mar 02 16:20:58 4-ridge-fw1 systemd[1]: systemd-networkd.service: Failed with result 'core-dump'. Mar 02 16:20:58 4-ridge-fw1 systemd[1]: Failed to start Network Service. These machines

Re: [Bug 1710278] Re: [2.3a1] named stuck on reload, DNS broken

2019-02-20 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Hold on, I think this bug is still problematic for MAAS and Ubuntu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1710278 Title: [2.3a1] named stuck on reload, DNS broken To manage notifications

[Bug 1680245] Re: subiquity does not take in account existing partition

2019-01-06 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
This does seem like a significant shortcoming in the current 18.04 install experience. Let's fix it in 19.04 and it will be available for 18.04 existing install media with a straightforward snap refresh. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1810578] Re: Set correct terminal size to improve login over serial port experience

2019-01-05 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
&& works better :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1810578 Title: Set correct terminal size to improve login over serial port experience To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1810578] Re: Set correct terminal size to improve login over serial port experience

2019-01-05 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Hmm... that .profile causes this on SSH logins, so needs tweaking: Last login: Sat Jan 5 10:49:02 2019 from 192.168.4.70 [1]+ Exit 1 [[ $(tty) == /dev/ttyS* ]] john@xx:~$ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1810578] [NEW] Set correct terminal size to improve login over serial port experience

2019-01-05 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Public bug reported: For people who use ipmiconsole or other serial port access to servers a great deal it would be helpful to set LINES and COLUMNS correctly on login. There are a number of ways to do this. I found a small (10k) C application at:

Re: New Ubuntu Core Developer - Tiago Stürmer Daitx

2018-12-21 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 11/21/18 5:36 AM, Olivier Tilloy wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 5:43 AM Simon Quigley wrote: >> Yesterday (Monday) Tiago was approved as an Ubuntu Core Developer by the >> Ubuntu Developer Membership Board. He now has upload rights to the >> entire Ubuntu archive. > Congratulations Tiago! >

Re: FYI: switch of default Launchpad VCS to git

2018-10-05 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 10/05/2018 06:21 AM, Robie Basak wrote: > Now that we have experimental "git-ubuntu" git repositories available > for most packages in main, we (the server/git-ubuntu team) will be > switching the default VCS for the Launchpad "ubuntu" distribution over > to git. Wow! This is a milestone worth

[Bug 1745597] Re: mii-monitor-interval unit is undocumented, and may be wrong

2018-09-28 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Hi folks Thanks for working on this. However, I think it unwise to change the units of the unqualified number in an SRU. That would mean that people who adjusted to "1" (second) as I did would suddenly find themselves at 1ms. Rather, I suggest: * keep the unqualified number as seconds *

Re: [Bug 796588] Re: Fine-grained network mediation

2018-09-12 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Fine-grained network security for snaps is going to be fantastic, but it's also a rich area, and when networking policy stuff is done simplistically it becomes awkward more than useful. I'd suggest that we start now working up detailed design on the topic, so that when we are ready to start

Re: [Bug 1791958] Re: iptables-restore is missing -w option

2018-09-12 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Seems like the point release would be a reasonable SRU. Mark -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791958 Title: iptables-restore is missing -w option To manage notifications about this

Re: [Bug 1785816] Re: Consider enabling CONFIG_NETWORK_PHY_TIMESTAMPING

2018-08-09 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Hi Seth, 18.04 LTS is plenty for my purposes and for users wanting to kick the tires on the functionality. No need for a backport on the change at this stage. Thank you! Mark -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1785816] Re: Consider enabling CONFIG_NETWORK_PHY_TIMESTAMPING

2018-08-09 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Colin, thanks for the analysis. No rush on the change. Mark -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785816 Title: Consider enabling CONFIG_NETWORK_PHY_TIMESTAMPING To manage notifications

Re: [Bug 1785816] Re: Consider enabling CONFIG_NETWORK_PHY_TIMESTAMPING

2018-08-07 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Thanks folks, looking forward to the results. I would have thought it would noop where the feature was not in use; as far as I know it requires explicit activation. Mark -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1785816] [NEW] Consider enabling CONFIG_NETWORK_PHY_TIMESTAMPING

2018-08-07 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Public bug reported: Hi folks, is there a reason we do not enable CONFIG_NETWORK_PHY_TIMESTAMPING ? I'm not sure of the tradeoffs but I think this config option is required for PTP time syncronization which would be useful in telco and financial (and OCD :)) environments. ** Affects: linux

Re: [Bug 1761997] Re: /var/run needs mode 777 in bionic

2018-07-26 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
\o/ thanks all, glad that one got in for the point release. Mark -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1761997 Title: /var/run needs mode 777 in bionic To manage notifications about this

Re: [ubuntu/cosmic-proposed] brotli 1.0.4-1 (Accepted)

2018-06-11 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Given how much I admire both of the folks on this thread, I'm going to suggest an excellent and well-earned weekend for both of you to recharge batteries. Jeremy, I've seen doko in action on go-karts, there's no gap between the green light and the accelerator pedal on the course :) Mark --

Re: Who pulled the plug on the server installer?

2018-06-04 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 06/04/2018 07:22 PM, Phillip Susi wrote: > Perhaps we shouldn't be promoting this new live installer on the web > site until it is ready. The new one is far simpler for the cases it supports; it also can get refreshed more easily out of cycle (i.e. we can deliver bug fixes to the installer

Re: [Bug 1771080] Re: gpsd should start after chrony if they are being used together

2018-05-17 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 05/17/2018 06:52 AM,  Christian Ehrhardt  wrote: > GPSD calls systemd helpers for the service which will end up in *inst > maintainer scripts. > in d/rules are: > dh_systemd_enable -pgpsd > > dh_installinit

[Bug 1771080] Re: gpsd should start after chrony if they are being used together

2018-05-16 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
** Changed in: gpsd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid ** Changed in: chrony (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771080 Title:

Re: [Bug 1771080] Re: gpsd should start after chrony if they are being used together

2018-05-16 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
I have an odd behaviour in that gpsd starts on one machine but not on the other. I think this is just me being new to systemd, please let's close this bug as invalid until I have a deeper root cause. Thanks for the help!  status invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1771080] Re: gpsd should start after chrony if they are being used together

2018-05-14 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
I think the existing gpsd.service has a bug in that it states After=chronyd.service when the correct service is chrony.service -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771080 Title: gpsd

[Bug 1771028] Re: Apparmor profile for chronyd needs to allow creation of /var/run/chrony.tty*.sock

2018-05-14 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Thanks Christian. The SOCK method is a much more accurate (apparently) way for chrony and gpsd to communicate. I do think we need to lock gpsd down as well but that's a separate issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1771080] [NEW] gpsd should start after chrony if they are being used together

2018-05-14 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Public bug reported: When using GPSD to provide a time signal over a socket to chrony, it is necessary to start gpsd after chrony (I think this is so that gpsd finds the /var/run/chrony.ttySX.sock file when it launches). gpsd tends to want to drop privileges quickly which makes it hard for it to

[Bug 1771028] [NEW] Apparmor profile for chronyd needs to allow creation of /var/run/chrony.tty*.sock

2018-05-13 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Public bug reported: When using chrony with gpsd for very accurate time, chrony wants to create a file called /var/run chrony.ttyXX.sock which gpsd will use when it starts. The current apparmor rules for chrony prevent that file from being created. I was able to fix this by manually adding this:

Ubiquity NG - was Re: ubiquity migrated to git

2018-05-10 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Thanks Dimitri for this! I'd like to start a thread on Ubiquity NG, and this seems like the best place and time to start :) First, a trip down memory lane. MDZ and I were shooting the moon on a Saturday afternoon in my apartment in London when the idea for Ubiquity formed. A live CD that would

Re: Ubiquity NG - was Re: ubiquity migrated to git

2018-05-09 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 05/09/2018 08:33 AM, Didier Roche wrote: > Some of us on the desktop team are volunteering for that task. > > I personnally remember when I received those 2 separate live and > install CD from Ubuntu 4.10. I was already praising the number of > simplifications that Ubuntu added in the Debian

Ubiquity NG - was Re: ubiquity migrated to git

2018-05-08 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Thanks Dimitri for this! I'd like to start a thread on Ubiquity NG, and this seems like the best place and time to start :) First, a trip down memory lane. MDZ and I were shooting the moon on a Saturday afternoon in my apartment in London when the idea for Ubiquity formed. A live CD that would

Re: [Bug 1764413] Re: may be clearer than

2018-04-18 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Yes, thanks Michael, all three for consistency. Mark -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764413 Title: may be clearer than To manage notifications about this bug go to:

Re: [Bug 1761994] Re: Shift of conntrackd to systemd notification causes upgrade issues from Xenial

2018-04-18 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Ah, elegant approach, BUT we'll need to maintain that patch carefully if it doesn't get upstreamed, a lazy future merge will just cause the problem to resurface. Mark -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1764413] [NEW] may be clearer than

2018-04-16 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Public bug reported: In the did-you-mean case (a command that is not found and which is not an exact match for an existing command but is close enough to warrant suggestions) it might be clearer to suggest 'snap info ' rather than 'snap info '. The use of a tight snapname suggest a single-word

Re: [Bug 1761994] Re: Shift of conntrackd to systemd notification causes upgrade issues from Xenial

2018-04-13 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Yes, the issue is on upgrade, where if you don't add the 'Systemd on' config, it fails. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1761994 Title: Shift of conntrackd to systemd notification

[Bug 1761997] [NEW] /var/run needs mode 777 in bionic

2018-04-07 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Public bug reported: I saw some odd behaviour of screen during the upgrade from Xenial to Bionic using do-release-upgrade. I was trying to use screen to reattach to an upgrade process that had gone sideways during a router daemon upgrade (duh). But I was told that the permissions on /run/screen

[Bug 1761994] [NEW] Shift of conntrackd to systemd notification causes upgrade issues from Xenial

2018-04-07 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Public bug reported: In Bionic, conntrackd configuration needs to be updated to use systemd notification otherwise we get problems during the upgrade process. Ultimately, it requires putting up with broken debconf scripts in the upgrade process, editing the file to reflect the new location,

[Bug 1754839] [NEW] CNF recommends 'snap info ' instead of 'snap info '

2018-03-10 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Public bug reported: The new language for CNF with snaps is much better thank you, but there is a mistake in that it recommends that you use 'snap info' with the *command* when it should in fact be 'snap info '. As an example: mark@mark:~$ aws Command 'aws' not found, but can be installed as:

Re: [Bug 1754012] Re: [FFe] openwsman, wsmancli

2018-03-10 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Thanks for the attention on this bug, but the upgrade process isn't reliable: Unpacking libwsman-client4:amd64 (2.6.5-0ubuntu2~18.04.2) ... dpkg: error processing archive /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-a3GKdH/7-libwsman-client4_2.6.5-0ubuntu2~18.04.2_amd64.deb (--unpack):  trying to overwrite

Re: [Bug 1754012] Re: [FFe] openwsman, wsmancli

2018-03-08 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Thanks, this will resolve a bunch of update issues in bionic. Also interested to know if the newer wsman helps or hinders AMT devices. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754012 Title:

[Bug 1751484] [NEW] Captive portal browser/device misreported

2018-02-24 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Public bug reported: The browser used in the captive portal system is reported as 'Desktop Safari Linux 64'. Could we change this to 'Ubuntu Desktop', please? ** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because

Re: [Bug 1749777] Re: Syntax tweaks for snap-friendly output

2018-02-21 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 02/21/2018 01:36 PM, Michael Vogt wrote: > We are working on improving this currently. Right now c-n-f has no > version concept for the apt backend (easy for snaps). But we have a plan > how to fix that (some work though). For the apt version, I thought we would just display the current

[Bug 1749777] Re: Syntax tweaks for snap-friendly output

2018-02-21 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Perhaps this would be a better format: $ aws The command 'aws' can be installed as: snap aws-cli (1.14.38) deb awscli (1.14.36-1) See 'snap info aws-cli' for additional versions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1734104] Re: 'upgrade' in bionic should by default autoremove as well

2018-02-16 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Perhaps we are talking at cross purposes. My expectation is that update would list the packages to be removed because they are no longer dependencies of packages that were consciously installed. On that basis, there should be no surprise to users. The messaging could point users to a handy

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >