[Bug 1999814] Re: [SRU] Allow for specifying common baseline CPU model with disabled feature

2024-07-12 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Likewise for Focal. Uploaded! ** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Rodrigo Barbieri (rodrigo-barbieri2010) -- You received

[Bug 2048517] Re: EPYC-Rome model without XSAVES may break live migration since the removal of the flag on the physical CPU

2024-07-12 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Rebased, reviewed, and build-tested on PPA [1]. Uploaded to Focal. [1] https://launchpad.net/~mfo/+archive/ubuntu/lp1999814 ** Description changed: + [ Impact ] + + * Live migration is increasingly being impacted by changes to CPU flags +(e.g., 'xsaves' disabled on AMD EPYC; PKRU/'xsave'

[Bug 1999814] Re: [SRU] Allow for specifying common baseline CPU model with disabled feature

2024-07-12 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Rodrigo Barbieri (rodrigo-barbieri2010) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2048517] Re: EPYC-Rome model without XSAVES may break live migration since the removal of the flag on the physical CPU

2024-07-12 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
riaged ** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) ** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released ** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu) Imp

[Bug 1999814] Re: [SRU] Allow for specifying common baseline CPU model with disabled feature

2024-07-11 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Rodrigo, Thanks for the debdiffs and SRU template! I've had minor changes to the Jammy upload, and build-tested it in a PPA [1]. It looks good; uploading! (I'm looking into/building Focal.) [1] https://launchpad.net/~mfo/+archive/ubuntu/lp1999814 ** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Jammy)

[Bug 1728031] Re: [SRU] Unable to change user password when ENFORCE_PASSWORD_CHECK is True

2024-07-09 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Debdiff for Antelope for bugs 1728031, 2054799, and 2055409. Build-tested on ppa:mfo/horizon-lp1728031-lp2054799-lp2055409-antelope [1] with antelope-updates enabled. Now looking for sponsorship to the cloud-archive. [1] https://launchpad.net/~mfo/+archive/ubuntu/horizon-

[Bug 2054799] Re: [SRU] Issue with Project administration at Cloud Admin level

2024-07-09 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Changed in: cloud-archive/antelope Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: cloud-archive/antelope Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054799

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-07-09 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Changed in: cloud-archive/antelope Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: cloud-archive/antelope Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055409

[Bug 1999814] Re: [SRU] Allow for specifying common baseline CPU model with disabled feature

2024-07-04 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The patch cannot be applied to Ubuntu Bionic (18.04), since its libvirt version is older than the minimum required (mentioned in the patch). The Ubuntu Cloud Archive for Bionic (eg, from Focal / Ussuri) can be used/patched though, as it provides a sufficiently newer version of libvirt. `QEMU

[Bug 1999814] Re: [SRU] Allow for specifying common baseline CPU model with disabled feature

2024-07-04 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The patch is present in Ubuntu Mantic and later. $ git grep skip_cpu_compare_at_startup pkg/ubuntu/oracular-devel -- nova/conf/workarounds.py pkg/ubuntu/oracular-devel:nova/conf/workarounds.py: cfg.BoolOpt('skip_cpu_compare_at_startup', $ git grep skip_cpu_compare_at_startup

[Bug 1969643] Re: RBD: Unable to delete a volume which has snapshot/volume children

2024-07-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Chengen, Thanks for implementing this! Could you please confirm/describe the testing performed with this additional patch/option? ** Changed in: cinder (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 2038648] Re: package sosreport 4.4-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed sosreport package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-07-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Arif, Thanks for testing! Could you please also check/confirm the steps 3 and 4 of the Test Plan, as we did in previous comments for testing, per the point in comment 3? ** Tags removed: verification-done-bionic ** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug

[Bug 2024258] Re: Performance degradation archiving DB with large numbers of FK related records

2024-07-01 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Description changed: [Impact] Originally, Nova archives deleted rows in batches consisting of a maximum number of parent rows (max_rows) plus their child rows, all within a single database transaction. This approach limits the maximum value of max_rows that can be specified by the

[Bug 1969643] Re: RBD: Unable to delete a volume which has snapshot/volume children

2024-06-27 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Ed and Chengen, Ed, thanks for your review and feedback. > I think that to make this patch really same some guardrails should be put in place. > it might have been safer to make this an optional feature, defaulting to disabled This also aligns with Dan's feedback (internal): > there are

[Bug 2038648] Re: package sosreport 4.4-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed sosreport package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-06-26 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Incomplete => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038648 Title: package sosreport 4.4-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to

[Bug 2038648] Re: package sosreport 4.4-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed sosreport package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-06-25 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Arif, Thanks for checking and confirming the locale changes are unrelated! I suspected the locale difference were unrelated, but wanted a closer look and clear understanding of why, before uploading, to ensure our changes to Bionic demonstrate the required care to request an upload in the

[Bug 2038648] Re: package sosreport 4.4-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed sosreport package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-06-25 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Lukas, Thanks for the assistance in sponsoring! I had other changes to make in the upload (in the PPA), so I'll reject this one and continue with that; sorry, I should have made that clearer in my previous comment. cheers, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2038648] Re: package sosreport 4.4-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed sosreport package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-06-19 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Arif, I've reviewed, updated SRU template, and built packages in a PPA [1]. It looks good, but there's an apparently unrelated change: some locale files are now in the sosreport deb package (pasted below). Could you please take a look? Thanks! Mauricio [1]

[Bug 2038648] Re: package sosreport 4.4-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed sosreport package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-06-19 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Description changed: - [impact] + [ Impact ] + + On release upgrade from Xenial to Bionic, + there seems to be an unknown corner case + (difficult to reproduce) that Python 3.5 + from Xenial is still in place at the time + sosreport from Bionic is installed, which + breaks postinst/py3compile

[Bug 1988366] Re: python-rtslib-fb needs to handle new attribute cpus_allowed_list

2024-06-19 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Jacob, Thanks for testing; that's good news. Package uploaded to Jammy; now waiting on review by the SRU team. cheers, Mauricio ** Changed in: python-rtslib-fb (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 2067810] Please test proposed package

2024-06-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello L, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.3.1~18.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 2067810] Please test proposed package

2024-06-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello L, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.3.1~20.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 2067810] Please test proposed package

2024-06-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello L, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.3.1~16.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 2067810] Please test proposed package

2024-06-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello L, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.3.1~22.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 2067810] Please test proposed package

2024-06-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello L, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.3.1~23.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 2067810] Re: Apparmor denial on /var/lib/dpkg/arch

2024-06-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello L, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/32.3.1~24.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 2056578] Please test proposed package

2024-06-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello Craig, or anyone else affected, Accepted torbrowser-launcher into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/torbrowser- launcher/0.3.7-1ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 2056578] Re: [SRU - Noble] Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning

2024-06-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Thanks for the upload as well. Ideally, the version should be `0.3.7-1ubuntu0.1` (not `ubuntu1`), as this is for stable release (see [1]), but in this case it's fine -- the version hasn't been used (see [2]), and will not be used anymore, as devel release is already at `0.3.7-2`. Now, I'd

[Bug 2056578] Re: [SRU - Noble] Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning

2024-06-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Thanks for mentioning that the proposed change is present in Firefox AppArmor profiles. Looking at its snap profiles, this can be traced back to snapd; that builds confidence. For documentation purposes: $ sudo apt update && sudo apt install -y firefox $ dpkg -s firefox | grep ^Description:

[Bug 2056578] Re: [SRU - Noble] Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning

2024-06-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Marking Oracular as Fix Released. torbrowser-launcher (0.3.7-2) unstable; urgency=medium [ Daniel Rusek ] * debian/patches: - Add patch 05 to fix keyboard input issue. ... ** Changed in: torbrowser-launcher (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: Invalid => Fix Released -- You received this

[Bug 2067510] Re: [SRU] enable ubuntustudio-fix-firstrun.service on initial login

2024-06-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello Erich, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntustudio-installer into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-installer/1.18.4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 2067512] Re: [SRU] fix for user first run should not affect live session user

2024-06-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello Erich, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntustudio-installer into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-installer/1.18.4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 2063401] Re: aardvark-dns fails to build

2024-06-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Tagging this bug as block-proposed-noble, in addition to the request in comment #1. aardvark-dns 1.6.0-1 (this upload) depends on netavark >> 1.6 [1], which cannot be satisfied on ppc64el as netavark 1.6.0-1, that is in noble-proposed FTBFS (build log [2]; see bug 2063447 comment 2), and

[Bug 1953572] Re: Broken links in the View Trends and the View Histogram menu

2024-06-13 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Description changed: [Impact] The links for the following are broken in the Service Information or the Host Information menus for the following links: View Trends For This Service View Alert Histogram For This Service View Trends For This Host View Alert Histogram For This Host

[Bug 1953572] Re: Broken links in the View Trends and the View Histogram menu

2024-06-13 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Test Steps: --- lxc launch ubuntu-daily:oracular nagios4-oracular lxc exec nagios4-oracular -- su - ubuntu sudo apt update sudo apt install nagios4 apache2 --yes --no-install-recommends sudo a2dismod mpm_event sudo a2dismod mpm_worker sudo a2enmod mpm_prefork sudo a2enmod php8.3 sudo a2enmod

[Bug 1953572] Re: Broken links in the View Trends and the View Histogram menu

2024-06-13 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Jorge, Thanks for your work on the analysis and SRU bug template! I checked this per your request, and we talked about it today. So, just some notes for documentation purposes and next steps. The proposed changed to `--with-cgiurl=` just works around the issue, that is the links are broken

[Bug 1953572] Re: Broken links in the View Trends and the View Histogram menu

2024-06-13 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Changed in: nagios4 (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: In Progress => Incomplete ** Changed in: nagios4 (Ubuntu Noble) Status: In Progress => Incomplete ** Changed in: nagios4 (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: In Progress => Incomplete ** Changed in: nagios4 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status:

[Bug 1969643] Re: RBD: Unable to delete a volume which has snapshot/volume children

2024-06-12 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Chengen, Now the changes review notes: This patch is concerning for a couple of reasons, if I understand correctly: 1) behavior changes that are potentially impactful to the storage backend; 2) new requirements for the deployment configuration that might seriously impact the deployment. In

[Bug 1969643] Re: RBD: Unable to delete a volume which has snapshot/volume children

2024-06-12 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Chengen, Thanks for your work on this bug / fix / SRU template! Some process review notes: In the future, please update the bug tasks for the newer/devel releases as well. In this case, Mantic not marked as Won't Fix possibly would require you an extra round-trip during the review with the

[Bug 1969643] Re: RBD: Unable to delete a volume which has snapshot/volume children

2024-06-12 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Also affects: cinder (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cinder (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cinder (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: cinder (Ubuntu Mantic)

[Bug 1969643] Re: RBD: Unable to delete a volume which has snapshot/volume children

2024-06-12 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Description changed: [Impact] Deleting a volume will fail if it has snapshot or volume children, resulting in an ImageBusy error. [Fix] Upstream has a patch that uses RBD flatten operations to break dependencies between volumes and snapshots, reducing failures when using RBD

[Bug 1969643] Re: RBD: Unable to delete a volume which has snapshot/volume children

2024-06-12 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Description changed: [Impact] Deleting a volume will fail if it has snapshot or volume children, resulting in an ImageBusy error. [Fix] Upstream has a patch that uses RBD flatten operations to break dependencies between volumes and snapshots, reducing failures when using RBD

[Bug 2055114] Re: fail2ban is broken in 24.04 Noble

2024-06-12 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Flipping the verification tags as requested in comment 65, based on feedback from comments 70, 68, and 66. (The other issue mentioned in comment 66 seems unrelated, and might just be something else now that the package is able to start services at all, and thus hit other issues.) Retried the

[Bug 2055114] Re: fail2ban is broken in 24.04 Noble

2024-06-10 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The vendorized asyncore.py is identical in python3-pyasyncore (main). It's better to rely on the package (vs. vendoring) for the stable release, specially for an LTS, where ESM is 10-12 years, to avoid code duplication and monitoring/patching on potential security vulnerabilities in 2 places.

[Bug 1988366] Re: python-rtslib-fb needs to handle new attribute cpus_allowed_list

2024-06-10 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
/ubuntu/lp1988366 ** Changed in: python-rtslib-fb (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Incomplete => Triaged ** Changed in: python-rtslib-fb (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: python-rtslib-fb (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliv

[Bug 2054343] Re: CVE-2023-4039: ARM64 GCC

2024-06-10 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Changed in: gcc-9 (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) ** Changed in: gcc-9 (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: gcc-9 (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: gcc-9 (Ubuntu Focal) Assigne

[Bug 2054343] Re: CVE-2023-4039: ARM64 GCC

2024-06-10 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Similarly for gcc-9 (9.5.0-6 in Noble/Oracular). gcc-9 (9.5.0-6) unstable; urgency=medium * Address stack protector and stack clash protection weaknesses on AArch64. CVE-2023-4039. $ rmadison -a source gcc-9 gcc-9 | 9.3.0-10ubuntu2| focal | source gcc-9 |

[Bug 2054343] Re: CVE-2023-4039: ARM64 GCC

2024-06-10 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Similarly for gcc-10 (10.5.0-4 in Noble/Oracular). gcc-10 (10.5.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium * Fix ftbfs on AArch64 in previous upload. gcc-10 (10.5.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Address stack protector and stack clash protection weaknesses on AArch64. CVE-2023-4039. Taken from the

[Bug 2054343] Re: CVE-2023-4039: ARM64 GCC

2024-06-10 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Similarly for gcc-11 (11.4.0-4 in Mantic/Noble/Oracular). gcc-11 (11.4.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium - Address stack protector and stack clash protection weaknesses on AArch64. CVE-2023-4039. $ rmadison -a source gcc-11 gcc-11 | 11.2.0-19ubuntu1 | jammy | source

[Bug 2054343] Re: CVE-2023-4039: ARM64 GCC

2024-06-10 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
gcc-12 fixed in 12.3.0-9, already in Mantic/Noble/Oracular (devel). gcc-12 (12.3.0-9) unstable; urgency=medium - Address stack protector and stack clash protection weaknesses on AArch64. CVE-2023-4039. $ rmadison -a source gcc-12 gcc-12 | 12-20220319-1ubuntu1 | jammy |

[Bug 2054343] Re: CVE-2023-4039: ARM64 GCC

2024-06-10 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Apparently, cannot target gcc-9 to Jammy/Focal, not even by going to the edit status link/page manually. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054343 Title: CVE-2023-4039: ARM64 GCC To

[Bug 2054343] Re: CVE-2023-4039: ARM64 GCC

2024-06-10 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: gcc-12 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: gcc-12 (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) ** Changed in: gcc-11 (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Change

[Bug 2068529] Re: Focal: Reverse proxy POST with with body length >1000 is missing body

2024-06-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
From ubuntu-ser...@lists.ubuntu.com: On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 11:31 AM Paride Legovini wrote: > # https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2068529 > # Focal: Reverse proxy POST with with body length >1000 is missing body > > The bug comes from SEG, so I asked for clarification on

Re: Triage report for bugs last updated on 2024-06-05

2024-06-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
ns from the server team are. I also asked a couple of > questions on the bug itself, and set it to Incomplete. Thanks for the triage, Paride! Just to clarify: I looked this up, and this bug doesn't come from SEG. Please feel free to handle it. I clarified this in more detail in the bug. cheers

[Bug 1728031] Re: [SRU] Unable to change user password when ENFORCE_PASSWORD_CHECK is True

2024-06-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The 2 autopkgtests failures above are infrastructure issues (both on armhf). I'll retry them in a while. 0s : failure: ['lxc', 'launch', '--ephemeral', ...] failed (exit status 1, stderr 'Error: The remote "..." doesn\'t exist\n') 0s autopkgtest [18:16:45]: ERROR: testbed failure: unexpected

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-06-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Uploaded to Focal. Build-tested on PPA [1] with -proposed enabled. [1] https://launchpad.net/~mfo/+archive/ubuntu/horizon- lp1728031-lp2054799-lp2055409/ ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Uploaded to Jammy. Build-tested on PPA [1] with -proposed enabled. [1] https://launchpad.net/~mfo/+archive/ubuntu/horizon- lp1728031-lp2054799-lp2055409/ ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In

[Bug 1728031] Re: [SRU] Unable to change user password when ENFORCE_PASSWORD_CHECK is True

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Uploaded to Jammy. Build-tested on PPA [1] with -proposed enabled. [1] https://launchpad.net/~mfo/+archive/ubuntu/horizon- lp1728031-lp2054799-lp2055409/ ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In

[Bug 2054799] Re: [SRU] Issue with Project administration at Cloud Admin level

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Uploaded to Jammy. Build-tested on PPA [1] with -proposed enabled. [1] https://launchpad.net/~mfo/+archive/ubuntu/horizon- lp1728031-lp2054799-lp2055409/ ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In

[Bug 1728031] Re: [SRU] Unable to change user password when ENFORCE_PASSWORD_CHECK is True

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Uploaded to Mantic. Build-tested on PPA [1] with -proposed enabled. [1] https://launchpad.net/~mfo/+archive/ubuntu/horizon- lp1728031-lp2054799-lp2055409/ ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In

[Bug 1728031] Re: [SRU] Unable to change user password when ENFORCE_PASSWORD_CHECK is True

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Robie (comment #35), Good point; I added that to the Test Plan section to be safe. Even if that's already covered in automated testing, glitches or regressions in the web UI, if any, would likely be quickly spot by humans, despite passing tests. Thanks! ** Description changed: After

[Bug 2054799] Re: [SRU] Issue with Project administration at Cloud Admin level

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Uploaded to Mantic. Build-tested on PPA [1] with -proposed enabled. [1] https://launchpad.net/~mfo/+archive/ubuntu/horizon- lp1728031-lp2054799-lp2055409/ ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Uploaded to Mantic. Build-tested on PPA [1] with -proposed enabled. [1] https://launchpad.net/~mfo/+archive/ubuntu/horizon- lp1728031-lp2054799-lp2055409/ ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Slightly reformatted the Impact section and clarified the behavior change/extension with the opt-in config. ** Description changed: Setting the config option OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES to False successfully allows skipping neutron calls when loading the instance list page,

[Bug 1728031] Re: [SRU] Unable to change user password when ENFORCE_PASSWORD_CHECK is True

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Uploaded to Noble. ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) -- You received

[Bug 2054799] Re: [SRU] Issue with Project administration at Cloud Admin level

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Uploaded to Noble. ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) -- You received

[Bug 1728031] Re: [SRU] Unable to change user password when ENFORCE_PASSWORD_CHECK is True

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Description changed: After following the security hardening guidelines: https://docs.openstack.org/security-guide/dashboard/checklist.html#check-dashboard-09-is-enforce-password-check-set-to-true After this check is enabled Check-Dashboard-09: Is ENFORCE_PASSWORD_CHECK set to True

[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Removed subscription of ubuntu-sponsors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054390 Title: Refine proc mounts entries traversal To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
No, please ignore it for now; there's an issue/regression identified in the patch. ** Changed in: cryptsetup (Ubuntu Noble) Status: In Progress => Incomplete ** Changed in: cryptsetup (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: In Progress => Incomplete ** Changed in: cryptsetup (Ubuntu Jammy)

[Bug 1728031] Re: [SRU] Unable to change user password when ENFORCE_PASSWORD_CHECK is True

2024-06-04 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Fix Committed in oracular-proposed (horizon 4:24.0.0-0ubuntu2) [1]. Waiting on proposed-migration to oracular (mostly autopkgtests) [2]. If all goes well with oracular/development release, I will proceed with review/sponsorship to the stable releses (I can handle those). [1]

[Bug 2054799] Re: [SRU] Issue with Project administration at Cloud Admin level

2024-06-04 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Fix Committed in oracular-proposed (horizon 4:24.0.0-0ubuntu2) [1]. Waiting on proposed-migration to oracular (mostly autopkgtests) [2]. If all goes well with oracular/development release, I will proceed with review/sponsorship to the stable releses (I can handle those). [1]

[Bug 2054799] Re: [SRU] Issue with Project administration at Cloud Admin level

2024-06-04 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Description changed: [Impact] We are not able to see the list of users and groups assigned to a project in Horizon. [Test Case] Please refer to [Test steps] section below. [Regression Potential] The fix ed768ab is already in the upstream main, stable/2024.1,

[Bug 1728031] Re: [SRU] Unable to change user password when ENFORCE_PASSWORD_CHECK is True

2024-06-04 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Oracular) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) -- You received this bug notification be

[Bug 2054799] Re: [SRU] Issue with Project administration at Cloud Admin level

2024-06-04 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Oracular) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) -- You received this bug notification be

[Bug 2061954] Re: filezilla crashed with SIGABRT in start_thread()

2024-06-04 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Marking as verification done for noble per comments 25, 26, 30, and 31 (requested in comment 24). Thanks! ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2063820] Re: rtl8812au-dkms DKMS FTBFS wrt Linux 6.8

2024-06-04 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Paolo, thanks for the upload to oracular. This is now just pending the regular verification of noble-proposed (comment #4). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063820 Title:

[Bug 2064914] Re: Windows guest hangs after reboot from the guest OS

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Björn, > @Mauricio as you can see the qemu version 6.2 is used in RHEL 8.5 too. > They integrated this patch two years ago. The QEMU project has this patch > since version 7.0. > I think it is well tested. Thanks for the reassurance of the code _change_ testing in RHEL and upstream! This

[Bug 2064914] Re: Windows guest hangs after reboot from the guest OS

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Sergio, thanks for the updates to the bug description/SRU template. I've extended the Test Plan to cover not only boots, but reboots too, of course, which the patch changes/exercises (missed this previously); and Regression Potential, to point to the modified area (cpu reset). ** Description

[Bug 2064914] Please test proposed package

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello Björn, or anyone else affected, Accepted qemu into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.20 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 2063112] Re: [arm64] autopkgtest - insufficient number of hugepages for all tests to succeed

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello Frode, or anyone else affected, Accepted openvswitch into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/3.3.0-1ubuntu3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 2063152] Re: [arm64] autopkgtest - some DPDK tests do not fit within CI memory constraints

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello Frode, or anyone else affected, Accepted openvswitch into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/3.3.0-1ubuntu3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 2066906] Please test proposed package

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello Frode, or anyone else affected, Accepted openvswitch into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/3.3.0-1ubuntu3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 2066906] Re: [noble] Missing fix for continuations with associated metering.

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Review feedback: - Versioning: It's standard practice that version string for stable releases are incremented by `ubuntu0.1`, and development release, by `ubuntu1` (please see [1]). This SRU/upload incremented by `ubuntu1`, but this was accepted previously (noble: ubuntu1, noble-proposed:

[Bug 2066906] Re: [noble] Missing fix for continuations with associated metering.

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Added to the 'Regression Potential' an statement along the lines of the intended meaning 'Where problems could occur' [3], which relates to where/what the patch changes. Please amend/correct in case I missed something/misunderstood the patch; thanks! [3]

[Bug 2066906] Re: [noble] Missing fix for continuations with associated metering.

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Marking devel/oracular as Fix Released (patch included): $ pull-lp-source openvswitch Found openvswitch 3.3.0-5 in oracular ... $ cd openvswitch-3.3.0 $ grep 'ofproto-dpif - continuation with meters' tests/ofproto-dpif.at AT_SETUP([ofproto-dpif - continuation with meters]) $ grep -A6

[Bug 2066906] Re: [noble] Missing fix for continuations with associated metering.

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
This is arguably a reasonable combination (although with slight differences) of 'FTBFS' and 'Autopkgtest failures' (i.e., 'for successful build/test run') acceptable per SRU policy (included below), thus should not need staging. And even though this SRU (openvswitch) is directed at

[Bug 2066908] Re: [SRU] ovn 24.03.2 point release

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Description changed: [Impact] This release sports mostly bug-fixes and we would like to make sure all of our supported customers have access to these improvements. The update contains the following package updates: -* ovn 24.03.2 +    * ovn 24.03.2 [Test Case] The

[Bug 2066906] Re: [noble] Missing fix for continuations with associated metering.

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Clarified/added '(Bug 2066908: [SRU] ovn 24.03.2 point release)' in the Impact section. ** Description changed: [ Impact ] There is a bug in Open vSwitch which is required for successful build and test run for OVN 24.03.2. + (Bug 2066908: [SRU] ovn 24.03.2 point release) [ Test plan ]

[Bug 2063112] Re: [arm64] autopkgtest - insufficient number of hugepages for all tests to succeed

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
For doc purposes (please clarify the tag change in the future, if at all possible :) `removed: block-proposed-noble`, see openvswitch 3.3.0-1ubuntu3 (including 3.3.0-1ubuntu2 above) in noble's unapproved queue; bug 2066906. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2063152] Re: [arm64] autopkgtest - some DPDK tests do not fit within CI memory constraints

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
For doc purposes (please clarify the tag change in the future, if at all possible :) `removed: block-proposed-noble`, see openvswitch 3.3.0-1ubuntu3 (including 3.3.0-1ubuntu2 above) in noble's unapproved queue; bug 2066906. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2066908] Re: [SRU] ovn 24.03.2 point release

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
SRU team: The upload in noble's unapproved queue (ovn 24.03.2-0ubuntu0.24.04.1) should only be accepted _after_ the openvswitch SRU for bug 2066906 is accepted, built, and available in noble-proposed (build-time dep): Per bug 2066906: 'There is a bug in Open vSwitch which is required for

[Bug 2063383] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu Unity takes 90 seconds to log out

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Simon, Just following up on this bug's failed verification (per above). Could you please clarify the next steps, when you have a chance? (e.g., an incremental fix to noble-proposed will be uploaded, or maybe the existing fix in noble-proposed should be removed if that may not happen soon; or

[Bug 2042844] Re: JS ERROR: Gio.DBusError: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Failed: error occurred in AboutToShow

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification still pending for noble-proposed (blocks combined SRU release for bugs 2059818/done, 2059819/done, 2042844/needed) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042844 Title: JS

[Bug 2063401] Re: aardvark-dns fails to build

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Adding bug task for Noble in Fix Committed as it's in noble-proposed (likewise for Oracular). $ rmadison -a source aardvark-dns | grep -e oracular -e noble aardvark-dns | 1.4.0-5| noble/universe | source aardvark-dns | 1.4.0-5| oracular/universe | source

[Bug 2054395] Re: [sru] sos upstream 4.7.0

2024-05-22 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Autopkgtests for oracular/cockpit/s390x passed with a retry, that should unblock the oracular-proposed migration shortly. 316-1build1 sosreport/4.7.0-0ubuntu12024-05-22 15:19:06 UTC 0h 04m 29s mfo pass 1bc3dca3-467e-430b-b336-fe8c1f19b6d5 -- You received

[Bug 2064686] Re: Add "oracular" as a known Ubuntu distribution

2024-05-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The autopkgtests failures for mantic/jammy/focal have cleared up with retries. Proceeding with the release of these series. lintian [mantic/armhf] 2.116.3ubuntu3.2lintian/2.116.3ubuntu3.2 2024-05-20 22:46:45 UTC 0h 32m 13s mfo pass

[Bug 2064686] Re: Add "oracular" as a known Ubuntu distribution

2024-05-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The verification for noble/mantic/jammy/focal look good; thanks! However, the autopkgtests failures for mantic/jammy/focal aren't clear. I retried them, as apparently they are infrastructure related timeouts/issues. I'll check later if still on shift. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 2064686] Update Released

2024-05-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The verification of the Stable Release Update for lintian has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a

[Bug 2060745] Update Released

2024-05-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The verification of the Stable Release Update for nbd has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a

[Bug 2060745] Re: nbd-client fails to connect Error: Socket failed: Connection refused

2024-05-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verificaton done on noble-proposed. Thanks for the detailed test steps! (I updated the last command from 'nbd-client -d nbd0' to 'nbd-client nbd0', which reflects the test step without the fix, in 'Now, trigger the problem'). Environment: --- lxc launch ubuntu:noble --vm mfo-noble-vm lxc shell

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >