[Bug 1007089] ProcCpuinfo.txt

2012-05-31 Thread Mike Mestnik
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007089/+attachment/3170995/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007089

[Bug 1007089] ProcEnviron.txt

2012-05-31 Thread Mike Mestnik
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcEnviron.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007089/+attachment/3170996/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007089

[Bug 1007089] ProcInterrupts.txt

2012-05-31 Thread Mike Mestnik
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007089/+attachment/3170997/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1007089] ProcModules.txt

2012-05-31 Thread Mike Mestnik
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007089/+attachment/3170998/+files/ProcModules.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007089

[Bug 1007089] WifiSyslog.txt

2012-05-31 Thread Mike Mestnik
apport information ** Attachment added: WifiSyslog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007089/+attachment/3171000/+files/WifiSyslog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007089

[Bug 1007089] UdevLog.txt

2012-05-31 Thread Mike Mestnik
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007089/+attachment/3170999/+files/UdevLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007089 Title:

[Bug 1007089] Re: overlayfs alters /proc/self/exe link(s), making result a dead link.

2012-05-31 Thread Mike Mestnik
I've made changes to /etc/asound.conf and now PulseAudio is starting and working. However I still get this warning: arcadia:~# invoke-rc.d pulseaudio restart * Stopping system PulseAudio Daemon[ OK ] * Starting system PulseAudio Daemon

[Bug 1006019] [NEW] Empathy can't connect to a Jabber account.

2012-05-29 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: Hello, #361731 says to open a new bug. #576335 seams to have something working, however in my case even irc is not connecting. http://pastebin.com/eijLQ7sm http://pastebin.com/QhrUHTPi ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: telepathy-gabble

[Bug 1006019] Re: Empathy can't connect to a Jabber account.

2012-05-29 Thread Mike Mestnik
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006019 Title: Empathy can't connect to a Jabber account. To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 996242] Re: Error with pastebin.com: THIS API HAS BEEN DISABLED. Please use Pastebin's new API. http://pastebin.com/api

2012-05-17 Thread Mike Mestnik
Looking at that page, I'm not sure how one would satisfy there new API in a foss project. Perhaps one might have users put in there own Developer Key. If some one were to publish there key then what's to stop every one from using it? It might be funny to brute-force a key and then use that, but

[Bug 993012] Re: Consider Provides on libgl(u?)-dev and libgl(u?).

2012-05-02 Thread Mike Mestnik
Looking today, it looks like the libgl1-mesa-dev packages have the correct provides. However the libgl1-mesa-dri packages don't. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993012 Title:

[Bug 993012] [NEW] Consider Provides on libgl(u?)-dev and libgl(u?).

2012-05-01 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: I'm working on packaging wine and this is the listed Build-Depends for OpenGL: libgl1-mesa-dev | libgl-dev, libglu1-mesa-dev | libglu-dev, After a build you know from 846361 that ${shlibs:Depends} will take in any package used in the build process. I wanted my package to

[Bug 993012] Re: Consider Provides on libgl(u?)-dev and libgl(u?).

2012-05-01 Thread Mike Mestnik
The Nvidia drivers are especially troublesome. The only Depends it seams I can use is nvidia-current and that isn't vary explicit. My current Depends line: libgl1-mesa-dri (= 8.1) | libgl | fglrx-driver | nvidia-current ** Also affects: nvidia-drivers-ubuntu Importance: Undecided

[Bug 993012] Re: Consider Provides on libgl(u?)-dev and libgl(u?).

2012-05-01 Thread Mike Mestnik
I'm going to ignore the other binary video drivers for Ubuntu I've found. Once this get's sorted out the solution can then be implemented there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993012

[Bug 991494] [NEW] llvm-config-3.1 --includedir: Reports wrong location.

2012-04-29 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: cheako@arcadia:~$ llvm-config-3.1 --includedir /lib/llvm-3.1/include Should be /usr/lib/llvm-3.1/include. ** Affects: llvm-3.1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 991493] [NEW] Missing llvm-config alternatives.

2012-04-29 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: Version-ed packages should use update-alternatives to manage the version-less instance. update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/llvm-config llvm-config /usr/bin /llvm-config-3.1 31 ** Affects: llvm-3.1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You

[Bug 991675] [NEW] Missing check for GPR limit, when shader requires too many registers.

2012-04-29 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: This bug effects Diablo III. http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=versioniId=25588 GPU lockup CP detected. Patch: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=783e4da72aa203a645737dec81b001341951a942 I've tested the package in my PPA and it corrects this

[Bug 991494] Re: llvm-config-3.1 --includedir: Reports wrong location.

2012-04-29 Thread Mike Mestnik
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/quantal/i386/llvm-3.1-dev/3.1~+rc1-3 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-3.1/3.1~+rc1-3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991494 Title:

[Bug 991494] Re: llvm-config-3.1 --includedir: Reports wrong location.

2012-04-29 Thread Mike Mestnik
Yeah, these pkgs. ** Changed in: llvm-3.1 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991494 Title: llvm-config-3.1 --includedir: Reports wrong

[Bug 991494] Re: llvm-config-3.1 --includedir: Reports wrong location.

2012-04-29 Thread Mike Mestnik
I wish I could say more. cheako@arcadia:~$ md5sum /usr/bin/llvm-config-3.1 a070ba8df9b7cdf376f8bc74c7fd3f12 /usr/bin/llvm-config-3.1 cheako@arcadia:~$ sha1sum /usr/bin/llvm-config-3.1 c03b2350f4d9e3384dabe2d4de6d9b2cbef56a04 /usr/bin/llvm-config-3.1 -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 987394] [NEW] udev starts too many vgchange -a y and then complains/fails on execution time.

2012-04-23 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: I have a little more then 112 partitions as part of an Logical Volume and every boot I get a tone of vgchange -a y timed out/killing messages. I don't know how much more I can say, it's a 3T driver with 25GB partitions. The idea is that 25GB will just fit onto a blu-ray

[Bug 987394] Re: udev starts too many vgchange -a y and then complains/fails on execution time.

2012-04-23 Thread Mike Mestnik
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987394 Title: udev starts too many vgchange -a y and then complains/fails on execution time. To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 882147] Re: overlayfs does not implement inotify interfaces correctly

2012-04-18 Thread Mike Mestnik
Vary well. Though there is still one thing that bothers me. If INotify is non- existant because only partial support would be avalible, how do applications like tail/upstart/ect work? Rhetorical I hope, they have to work regardless. So that begs my original question! Why bother with inotify.

[Bug 882147] Re: overlayfs does not implement inotify interfaces correctly

2012-04-10 Thread Mike Mestnik
John, You make an interesting point about returning with failure. Applications should account for all modes of failure, even when success is reported. As for the point of having inotify at all, this was addressed in my first post I wrote on 2012-02-25. My skepticism about reporting error if

[Bug 882147] Re: overlayfs does not implement inotify interfaces correctly

2012-03-21 Thread Mike Mestnik
Colin, This is the second time I've replied to this, so I'll be brief. A filesystem can implement inotify most of the time, while still being unable to implement it all of the time. A good example is a filesystem where inotify is disabled, or unable to be implemented, when flock is in use.

[Bug 882147] Re: overlayfs does not implement inotify interfaces correctly

2012-03-21 Thread Mike Mestnik
Depending on an advertised feature simply because it was advertised is an error. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882147 Title: overlayfs does not implement inotify interfaces

[Bug 882147] Re: overlayfs does not implement inotify interfaces correctly

2012-03-21 Thread Mike Mestnik
So, I should open a bug regarding the use of inotify on other filesystems including but not limited to overlayfs? I understand the need to accurately track separate issues, but the solution is the same. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 956827] Re: embedded terminal doesn't update

2012-03-17 Thread Mike Mestnik
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 882147 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882147 This doesn't account for situations where a filesystem would partially support inotify. It's vary common in some places for a technology to be usable some of most of the time, while not being usable in some

[Bug 956827] Re: embedded terminal doesn't update

2012-03-16 Thread Mike Mestnik
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 882147 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882147 Tail should work even without inotify, actually there is nothing that should not be so fragile that the lack of any one add-on, or dare I say optional, feature should cause a problem. Tail worked long b4

[Bug 956827] Re: embedded terminal doesn't update

2012-03-16 Thread Mike Mestnik
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 882147 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882147 ...did I make a double negative there. I think you can get at what I'm saying. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 954666] Re: File: Digital Signatures and Protect missing GPG support.

2012-03-14 Thread Mike Mestnik
Hello Christopher, When you add Won't Fix to a bugs status it removes it from the Upstream status Report. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Upstream/UpstreamReport This gives the libreoffice pkg a skewed view to upstream of how well we're(Ubuntu) is doing at linking and forwarding bugs. Plus, even

[Bug 905686] Re: nautilus assert failure: nautilus: ../../src/xcb_io.c:528: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed.

2012-03-13 Thread Mike Mestnik
Mahyar, I haven't had this in a while, however it's never glitched my grfx. What driver/card do you have? Any extra options enabled? I use also Gnome Shell, more information on your issue would be nice. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 940792] Re: package bluez 4.98-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-03-13 Thread Mike Mestnik
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 882147 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882147 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 882147 overlayfs does not implement inotify interfaces correctly -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 940797] Re: package zram-config 0.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-03-13 Thread Mike Mestnik
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 882147 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882147 This for me was due to the upgrade process depending on inotify and the overlayfs provided on a USB device doesn't provide it. Try hupping(using telinit, if it exists) whatever they call init these days PID

[Bug 940794] Re: package bluez 4.98-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-03-13 Thread Mike Mestnik
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 882147 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882147 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 940792 package bluez 4.98-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** This bug has been

[Bug 954666] [NEW] File: Digital Signatures and Protect missing GPG support.

2012-03-13 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: Firstly the Digital Signatures feature seams impossible to use. How can I import my Certificate, in the rare case that I have one? Digital Signatures seams to be based off the use of Certificates, many ppl have and sign PGP/GPG keys. Signing documents using GPG keys is an

[Bug 954666] Re: File: Digital Signatures and Protect missing GPG support.

2012-03-13 Thread Mike Mestnik
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954666 Title: File: Digital Signatures and Protect missing GPG support. To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 945738] Re: not a valid file descriptor at /usr/lib/perl5/Glib/ParseXSDoc.pm line 107

2012-03-03 Thread Mike Mestnik
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945738 Title: not a valid file descriptor at /usr/lib/perl5/Glib/ParseXSDoc.pm line 107 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 945738] [NEW] not a valid file descriptor at /usr/lib/perl5/Glib/ParseXSDoc.pm line 107

2012-03-03 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: Running make for R/RM/RMCFARLA/Gtk2-Perl/Gtk2-GLExt-0.90.tar.gz CPAN: Digest::SHA loaded ok (v5.61) Checksum for /root/.cpan/sources/authors/id/R/RM/RMCFARLA/Gtk2-Perl/Gtk2-GLExt-0.90.tar.gz ok Gtk2-GLExt-0.90/ Gtk2-GLExt-0.90/perl-Gtk2-GLExt.spec.in Gtk2-GLExt-0.90/xs/

[Bug 943119] Re: aufs.ko missing from the Precise kernels

2012-03-01 Thread Mike Mestnik
I believe most are confident that overlayfs will replace aufs. However I'm concerned that there is no user-space tool, though mount -o remount might be enough. The lack of documentation and the fact that it's(or was) enabled in the config file, but not included in the package concern me. The

[Bug 940765] Re: error processing linux-image-3.2.0-17-generic-pae

2012-02-28 Thread Mike Mestnik
Joseph, Sorry, but obviously this is during an upgrade the previous kernel was 3.2.0-9-generic-pae. I eventually got it installed and working, I think this may have something to do with the inotify does not work on unionfs bug. However crypsetup seams to have it's own problems. -- You

[Bug 940793] Re: apport-gtk crashed with TypeError in run_crash(): string indices must be integers, not str

2012-02-26 Thread Mike Mestnik
Two reports at once. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940793 Title: apport-gtk crashed with TypeError in run_crash(): string indices must be integers, not str To manage

[Bug 940793] Re: apport-gtk crashed with TypeError in run_crash(): string indices must be integers, not str

2012-02-26 Thread Mike Mestnik
Not better now! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940793 Title: apport-gtk crashed with TypeError in run_crash(): string indices must be integers, not str To manage notifications

[Bug 941089] Re: Force /etc/crypttab entry for inclusion in initrd.

2012-02-25 Thread Mike Mestnik
** Tags removed: whishlist ** Tags added: wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941089 Title: Force /etc/crypttab entry for inclusion in initrd. To manage notifications about this

[Bug 941089] [NEW] Force /etc/crypttab entry for inclusion in initrd.

2012-02-25 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: Hello, I've looked over the grub hooks for selecting key and application material for inclusion in the initrd and this stuff is fantastic! However I've noted there is currently no way to force a entry in crypttab to be included and opened by the initrd. One possible use

[Bug 940762] [NEW] package resolvconf 1.63ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-02-24 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: I don't know what's going on here. This is a USB live image where I've followed the steps to fold the cow image into the ro one. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: resolvconf 1.63ubuntu8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.26-generic-pae 3.2.6

[Bug 940762] Re: package resolvconf 1.63ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-02-24 Thread Mike Mestnik
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940762 Title: package resolvconf 1.63ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To

[Bug 940765] [NEW] error processing linux-image-3.2.0-17-generic-pae

2012-02-24 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: This is kvm running a USB image. Setting up linux-image-3.2.0-17-generic-pae (3.2.0-17.26) ... Running depmod. update-initramfs: deferring update (hook will be called later) Examining /etc/kernel/postinst.d. run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools

[Bug 940765] Re: error processing linux-image-3.2.0-17-generic-pae

2012-02-24 Thread Mike Mestnik
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940765 Title: error processing linux-image-3.2.0-17-generic-pae To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 940797] [NEW] package zram-config 0.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-02-24 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: All better now. ProblemType: Package Package: zram-config 0.1 AptOrdering: initramfs-tools: Configure udev: Configure bluez: Configure kbd: Configure zram-config: Configure Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Feb 17 21:57:17 2012 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed

[Bug 940797] Re: package zram-config 0.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-02-24 Thread Mike Mestnik
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940797 Title: package zram-config 0.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage

[Bug 940796] [NEW] package resolvconf 1.63ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-02-24 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: All better now. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: resolvconf 1.63ubuntu8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.26-generic-pae 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 1.93-0ubuntu2 Architecture: i386 CasperVersion: 1.304 Date: Fri

[Bug 940796] Re: package resolvconf 1.63ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-02-24 Thread Mike Mestnik
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940796 Title: package resolvconf 1.63ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To

[Bug 940795] [NEW] package linux-image-3.2.0-17-generic-pae 3.2.0-17.27 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1

2012-02-24 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: All better now. ProblemType: Package Package: linux-image-3.2.0-17-generic-pae 3.2.0-17.27 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Feb 24 22:21:43 2012 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 SourcePackage: linux ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)

[Bug 940795] Re: package linux-image-3.2.0-17-generic-pae 3.2.0-17.27 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1

2012-02-24 Thread Mike Mestnik
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940795 Title: package linux-image-3.2.0-17-generic-pae 3.2.0-17.27 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned

[Bug 940794] [NEW] package bluez 4.98-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-02-24 Thread Mike Mestnik
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 940792 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940792 Public bug reported: All better now. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: bluez 4.98-0ubuntu9 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.27-generic-pae 3.2.6 Uname: Linux

[Bug 940794] Re: package bluez 4.98-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-02-24 Thread Mike Mestnik
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 940792 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940792 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940794 Title: package bluez 4.98-2ubuntu1 failed to

[Bug 940793] [NEW] apport-gtk crashed with TypeError in run_crash(): string indices must be integers, not str

2012-02-24 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: All better now. ProblemType: Crash CrashCounter: 1 Date: Fri Feb 24 00:43:08 2012 ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk ExecutableTimestamp: 1326876521 InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7 ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk ProcCwd: /home/ubuntu

[Bug 940793] Re: apport-gtk crashed with TypeError in run_crash(): string indices must be integers, not str

2012-02-24 Thread Mike Mestnik
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940793 Title: apport-gtk crashed with TypeError in run_crash(): string indices must be integers, not str To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 940792] [NEW] package bluez 4.98-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-02-24 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: All better now. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: bluez 4.98-0ubuntu9 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.27-generic-pae 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 1.93-0ubuntu2 Architecture: i386 CasperVersion: 1.304 CurrentDmesg:

[Bug 940792] Re: package bluez 4.98-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-02-24 Thread Mike Mestnik
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940792 Title: package bluez 4.98-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To

[Bug 882147] Re: overlayfs does not implement inotify interfaces correctly

2012-02-24 Thread Mike Mestnik
Well, inotify is great and all. However features like this simply won't always exist or always work properly. A good case in point is locking over NFS. Thus dpkg or the install scripts need a hook for every file that needs inotify. This call back should be run after the inotify and it should

[Bug 938187] Re: aufs configured as a module, but module not included in package.

2012-02-22 Thread Mike Mestnik
There are a few tasks that still need to be carried out. Most important the user-space tools need to be updated(even removed) to reflect this change. Secondly the configuration should have it's config_aufs_fs set to no. ** Also affects: aufs Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also

[Bug 938187] Re: aufs configured as a module, but module not included in package.

2012-02-22 Thread Mike Mestnik
Are there any instructions on migrating? I had forgot to mention that I'm attempting to fold a casper-rw(cow) image and filesystem.squashfs into a new filesystem.squashfs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 938187] Re: aufs configured as a module, but module not included in package.

2012-02-21 Thread Mike Mestnik
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938187 Title: aufs configured as a module, but module not included in package. To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 938187] [NEW] aufs configured as a module, but module not included in package.

2012-02-21 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: Where is aufs hiding these days? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: linux-image-3.2.0-17-generic-pae 3.2.0-17.26 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.26-generic-pae 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic-pae i686 AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound

[Bug 740011] Re: Natty: the driver sp5100_tco prevents PC startup

2012-02-12 Thread Mike Mestnik
3.2.0-9-generic-pae I'd like to use this watchdog. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740011 Title: Natty: the driver sp5100_tco prevents PC startup To manage notifications about this

[Bug 740011] Re: Natty: the driver sp5100_tco prevents PC startup

2012-02-12 Thread Mike Mestnik
...ohh and I get the same warning. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740011 Title: Natty: the driver sp5100_tco prevents PC startup To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 843268] Re: gnome-control-center doesn't allow to specify proxy exceptions

2012-02-07 Thread Mike Mestnik
I would love to form a project/team/comity that would work with developers and package maintainers to address proxy issues and also maintain a minimum compliance specification. This task defiantly needs Linux Plumbers type endeavor. I believe that proxy support needs to be a future release

[Bug 794757] Re: Apport displays mysterious prompt

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Mestnik
I'd just like to update the record to include the trouble shooting steps for defective media. However after attempting to do so I realized I was no expert. Trying again seams best. Once an issue is reported by multiple media using multiple devices, it most likely is not defective media.

[Bug 794757] Re: Apport displays mysterious prompt

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Mestnik
badblocks -n comes to mind. If the bootable USB drive passes this test, then it's 100% good. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/794757 Title: Apport displays mysterious prompt To

[Bug 744836] Re: gvfsd-metadata crashed with SIGSEGV

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Mestnik
badblocks -n comes to mind. If the bootable USB drive passes this test, then it's 100% good. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744836 Title: gvfsd-metadata crashed with SIGSEGV To

[Bug 744836] Re: gvfsd-metadata crashed with SIGSEGV

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Mestnik
I'd just like to update the record to include the trouble shooting steps for defective media. However after attempting to do so I realized I was no expert. Trying again seams best. Once an issue is reported by multiple media using multiple devices, it most likely is not defective media.

[Bug 744836] Re: gvfsd-metadata crashed with SIGSEGV

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Mestnik
I should learn to keep my mouth shut. badblocks -n is likely to cause USB flash defects, however it would indicate that the drive WAS 110% good. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744836

[Bug 794757] Re: Apport displays mysterious prompt

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Mestnik
I should learn to keep my mouth shut. badblocks -n is likely to cause USB flash defects, however it would indicate that the drive WAS 110% good. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/794757

[Bug 919772] [NEW] mission-control-5: chmod ~/.cache/

2012-01-21 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: type=1400 audit(1327040048.322:444): apparmor=DENIED operation=chmod parent=1 profile=/usr/lib/telepathy/mission-control-5 name=/home/cheako/.cache/ pid=9163 comm=mission-control requested_mask=w denied_mask=w fsuid=1000 ouid=1000 cheako@arcadia:~$ stat .cache/ File:

[Bug 919772] Re: mission-control-5: chmod ~/.cache/

2012-01-21 Thread Mike Mestnik
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919772 Title: mission-control-5: chmod ~/.cache/ To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 209488] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with SIGSEGV in XChangeProperty()

2012-01-21 Thread Mike Mestnik
Does it look like this is the same? bamestnik@arcadia:~$ gdb huludesktop GNU gdb (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.3.92-0ubuntu2) 7.3.92 Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and

[Bug 918879] [NEW] Firefox apparmor profile, WebGL/DRI and libc corrections.

2012-01-19 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: libc: It's hard to find an application that dosn't read ld.so.preload, so all apparmor profiles should define it. WebGL is calling DRI on my system and that means reading drirc. Thanks! diff -u -r1.1 /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox --- /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox

[Bug 918879] Re: Firefox apparmor profile, WebGL/DRI and libc corrections.

2012-01-19 Thread Mike Mestnik
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918879 Title: Firefox apparmor profile, WebGL/DRI and libc corrections. To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 918879] Re: Firefox apparmor profile, WebGL/DRI and libc corrections.

2012-01-19 Thread Mike Mestnik
Jamie, thank you for that as I'm unfamiliar with Apparmor. What do ppl think about ld.so.preload? To tell the truth I used to put tsocks in that file, but since FF has it's own socks client it can be excluded from loading tsocks. For the most part preload should be enabled, but there are some

[Bug 908614] Re: /run: Too many levels of symbolic links

2012-01-09 Thread Mike Mestnik
Vary well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908614 Title: /run: Too many levels of symbolic links To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 908614] Re: /run: Too many levels of symbolic links

2012-01-09 Thread Mike Mestnik
Vary well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908614 Title: /run: Too many levels of symbolic links To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 908614] Re: /run: Too many levels of symbolic links

2012-01-06 Thread Mike Mestnik
This was all done using apt-get. After do-release-upgrade had failed to find an upgrade path, I ran `find /etc/apt -type f -exec sed -i -e 's/lucid/precise/g'` and then I manually went through and downgraded a few packages to help satisfy dependencies. I understand that /run is likely needed in

[Bug 908614] Re: /run: Too many levels of symbolic links

2012-01-06 Thread Mike Mestnik
This was all done using apt-get. After do-release-upgrade had failed to find an upgrade path, I ran `find /etc/apt -type f -exec sed -i -e 's/lucid/precise/g'` and then I manually went through and downgraded a few packages to help satisfy dependencies. I understand that /run is likely needed in

[Bug 909053] Re: Alternatives for x-window-manager if not x-session-manager.

2012-01-01 Thread Mike Mestnik
Where is the Ubuntu Policy Manual? I only know about Debian and since both alternatives and menu are part of Ubuntu I have to assume the policy regarding this has also been copied. http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s-menus http://j.mp/rueS4P In short .desktop files should

[Bug 909749] Re: gvfsd-metadata crashed with SIGSEGV

2011-12-29 Thread Mike Mestnik
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 744836 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744836 ** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/909749 Title:

[Bug 909750] Re: nautilus assert failure: nautilus: ../../src/xcb_io.c:528: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed.

2011-12-29 Thread Mike Mestnik
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/909750 Title: nautilus assert failure: nautilus: ../../src/xcb_io.c:528: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id'

[Bug 908614] Re: /run: Too many levels of symbolic links

2011-12-27 Thread Mike Mestnik
I made both into a directory with no symlinks. For the time being /var/run is a link to /run, should be ../run if any thing. I believe that if /var/run is needed prior to /var being mounted that /tmp should be used. After var is mounted /tmp can hold symlinks into /var/run. -- You received

[Bug 909053] [NEW] Alternatives for x-window-manager if not x-session-manager.

2011-12-27 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: Not installing these takes gnome-shell out of the running for startx default. Also there is no menu file, just a .desktop file. Is there a tool to generate menu files from .desktop, because the reverse is true. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package:

[Bug 909053] Re: Alternatives for x-window-manager if not x-session-manager.

2011-12-27 Thread Mike Mestnik
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/909053 Title: Alternatives for x-window-manager if not x-session-manager. To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 908614] Re: /run: Too many levels of symbolic links

2011-12-27 Thread Mike Mestnik
I made both into a directory with no symlinks. For the time being /var/run is a link to /run, should be ../run if any thing. I believe that if /var/run is needed prior to /var being mounted that /tmp should be used. After var is mounted /tmp can hold symlinks into /var/run. -- You received

[Bug 908614] [NEW] /run: Too many levels of symbolic links

2011-12-25 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: root@ubuntu:~# ls /run ls: cannot access /run: Too many levels of symbolic links root@ubuntu:~# ls -alrt /run /var/run lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Dec 24 14:58 /run - /var/run lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Dec 25 14:42 /var/run - /run ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04

[Bug 908614] Re: /run: Too many levels of symbolic links

2011-12-25 Thread Mike Mestnik
** Also affects: debian-base-files Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sysvinit Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.

[Bug 908614] Re: /run: Too many levels of symbolic links

2011-12-25 Thread Mike Mestnik
root@ubuntu:~# dpkg -S /var/run base-files, initscripts: /run base-files, dnsmasq-base: /var/run -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908614 Title: /run: Too many levels

[Bug 908614] [NEW] /run: Too many levels of symbolic links

2011-12-25 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: root@ubuntu:~# ls /run ls: cannot access /run: Too many levels of symbolic links root@ubuntu:~# ls -alrt /run /var/run lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Dec 24 14:58 /run - /var/run lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Dec 25 14:42 /var/run - /run ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04

[Bug 908614] Re: /run: Too many levels of symbolic links

2011-12-25 Thread Mike Mestnik
** Also affects: debian-base-files Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sysvinit Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 908614] Re: /run: Too many levels of symbolic links

2011-12-25 Thread Mike Mestnik
root@ubuntu:~# dpkg -S /var/run base-files, initscripts: /run base-files, dnsmasq-base: /var/run -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908614 Title: /run: Too many levels of symbolic links

[Bug 828679] Re: colord crashed with SIGABRT in __kernel_vsyscall()

2011-12-24 Thread Mike Mestnik
usb-creator, 12.04 12/20/11 daily build dvd-i386. Printer(s) connected. Lexmark, not supported. DeskJet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828679 Title: colord crashed with SIGABRT in

[Bug 907324] [NEW] Tunnel is always dying: http://j.mp/vhdRku

2011-12-21 Thread Mike Mestnik
Public bug reported: I'll try and summaries my links. gw6c should try reconnecting on keep-alive timeout events. When disconnection occurs because of an error, the auto-reconnection is not applied. Some would say this is great and there is no other way, while others would insist that gw6c never

<    1   2   3   4   >