[Bug 994476] Re: libvirt-bin : error : virExecWithHook:328 : Cannot find 'pm-is-supported' in path: No such file or directory

2012-07-26 Thread Numérigraphe
Dear Serge Hallyn, Why do prefer to keep pm-utils out of the suggests please? Lionel Sausin. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994476 Title: libvirt-bin : error : virExecWithHook:328 :

[Bug 919109] [NEW] No tray icon in Unity

2012-01-20 Thread Numérigraphe
Public bug reported: Normally blueproximity seems to have a tray icon to let you query the status and summon the configuration window, but this tray icon does not show up in Unity in Oneiric. Lionel. ** Affects: blueproximity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You

[Bug 837300] Re: gnome-screensaver proximity command doesn't exist

2012-01-20 Thread Numérigraphe
I suggest using gnome-screensaver-command -d instead, just to make sure the screen is unlocked. Lionel Sausin -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/837300 Title: gnome-screensaver

[Bug 858644] Re: DRBD Linux Headers Required

2012-01-05 Thread Numérigraphe
Isn't this a duplicate of #483410 ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to drbd8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858644 Title: DRBD Linux Headers Required To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 912254] [NEW] Please upgrade to 8.3.12 for Precise

2012-01-05 Thread Numérigraphe
Public bug reported: DRBD 8.3.12 was published recently and makes DRBD more robust in the face of a network or storage failure. Furthermore, DRBD 8.3.12 will probably be the last 8.3.x revision, because 8.4 is out. I think that makes it a good candidate for inclusion in the upcoming LTS, so

[Bug 858644] Re: DRBD Linux Headers Required

2012-01-05 Thread Numérigraphe
Isn't this a duplicate of #483410 ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858644 Title: DRBD Linux Headers Required To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 912254] [NEW] Please upgrade to 8.3.12 for Precise

2012-01-05 Thread Numérigraphe
Public bug reported: DRBD 8.3.12 was published recently and makes DRBD more robust in the face of a network or storage failure. Furthermore, DRBD 8.3.12 will probably be the last 8.3.x revision, because 8.4 is out. I think that makes it a good candidate for inclusion in the upcoming LTS, so

[Bug 853750] Re: Wrong owner on symlinks make IBM DB2's administrative server fail

2011-10-20 Thread Numérigraphe
** Summary changed: - Wrong owner on symlinks make IBM DB2's administrative fail + Wrong owner on symlinks make IBM DB2's administrative server fail -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 853750] [NEW] Wrong owner on symlink make IBM DB2's administrative instance fail to start

2011-09-19 Thread Numérigraphe
Public bug reported: On db2exc 9.7.4-0lucid3, the init script tries to start the administration instance by: - su-ing to the admin instance user - calling db2admin, which is in ~/das/bin/db2admin, which is in the PATH This fails with the message -su: das/bin/db2admin: Permission denied. Calling

[Bug 853750] Re: Wrong owner on symlinks make IBM DB2's administrative fail

2011-09-19 Thread Numérigraphe
** Summary changed: - Wrong owner on symlink make IBM DB2's administrative instance fail to start + Wrong owner on symlinks make IBM DB2's administrative fail ** Description changed: On db2exc 9.7.4-0lucid3, the init script tries to start the administration instance by: - su-ing to the

[Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share

2011-07-09 Thread Numérigraphe
** Branch unlinked: lp:openobject-addons/extra-5.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1 Title: Microsoft has a majority market share To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 307452] Re: non configurable behaviour for lvm2 through lvm.conf in initramfs use

2011-06-19 Thread Numérigraphe
** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307452 Title: non configurable behaviour for lvm2 through lvm.conf in initramfs use To

[Bug 307452] Re: non configurable behaviour for lvm2 through lvm.conf in initramfs use

2011-06-19 Thread Numérigraphe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 113515 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113515 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 113515 Omits /etc/lvm/lvm.conf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 307452] Re: non configurable behaviour for lvm2 through lvm.conf in initramfs use

2011-06-19 Thread Numérigraphe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 246324 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246324 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 113515 Omits /etc/lvm/lvm.conf ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 246324 initramfs-tools lvm2-hookscript won't include lvm.conf and claim devices

[Bug 246326] Re: initramfs-tools lvm2-hookscript won't include lvm.conf and claim devices it shouldn't

2011-06-19 Thread Numérigraphe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 246324 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246324 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 113515 Omits /etc/lvm/lvm.conf ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 246324 initramfs-tools lvm2-hookscript won't include lvm.conf and claim devices

[Bug 113515] Re: Omits /etc/lvm/lvm.conf

2011-06-19 Thread Numérigraphe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 246324 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246324 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 246324 initramfs-tools lvm2-hookscript won't include lvm.conf and claim devices it shouldn't -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 519031] Re: rsnapshot in Lucid does not support using link_dest and sync_first simultaneously

2011-05-23 Thread Numérigraphe
Dear Ubuntu SRU team, Would you please be so kind as to look into this bug and its proposed resolution? I have updated the bug description to match the SRU procedure to the best of my abilities. Thanks in advance, Lionel Sausin. ** Description changed: Binary package hint: rsnapshot -

[Bug 519031] Re: rsnapshot in Lucid does not support using link_dest and sync_first simultaneously

2011-05-18 Thread Numérigraphe
** Summary changed: - rsnapshot does not support using link_dest and sync_first simultaneously + rsnapshot in Lucid does not support using link_dest and sync_first simultaneously -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 519031] Re: rsnapshot does not support using link_dest and sync_first simultaneously

2011-05-16 Thread Numérigraphe
This is a known bug in 1.3.0 indeed. I'll see if I can isolate the patchset needed to fix this, so we can propose this for lucid updates. Lionel Sausin ** Changed in: rsnapshot (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 519031] Re: rsnapshot does not support using link_dest and sync_first simultaneously

2011-05-16 Thread Numérigraphe
The minimal fix is to not test whether the .sync directory exists, as was introduced upsteam in rsnapshot-program.pl v1.377. A patch is available at http://rsnapshot.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/rsnapshot/rsnapshot/rsnapshot-program.pl?r1=1.377r2=1.378view=patch I pushed a branch with this fix at

[Bug 519031] Re: rsnapshot does not support using link_dest and sync_first simultaneously

2011-05-16 Thread Numérigraphe
I just pushed a patched version on our PPA, all subscribers could you please report if this fixes the problem? Then we could ask for inclusion in lucid. Lionel. ** Changed in: rsnapshot (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 519031] Re: rsnapshot does not support using link_dest and sync_first simultaneously

2011-05-16 Thread Numérigraphe
I forgot to mention the URL of the PPA : https://launchpad.net/~numerigraphe/+archive/ppa . The package is waiting to build, but should be available soon. Lionel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 751277] [NEW] Automatic partitioning makes a too small / in natty beta with 4Gb disk and 2Gb RAM

2011-04-05 Thread Numérigraphe
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity I just tried installing natty beta on my eeepc, accepting all default options on my eeepc 701. It has only 4Gb disk space, but 2Gb RAM. The automatic partitioning tool created a 1862MB / partition, and a 2135 swap partition, but the next step

[Bug 751331] [NEW] French translations need review

2011-04-05 Thread Numérigraphe
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: unity-place-applications It seems that all the strings for unity-place-applications have translation suggestions for French, but they have not been reviewed yet. it would be good if that was done in time for Natty - if there is still time of course.

[Bug 744293] [NEW] Infinite loop in helper LVM script for DRBD 8 in Lucid

2011-03-28 Thread Numérigraphe
Public bug reported: The script /usr/lib/drbd/snapshot-resync-target-lvm.sh shipped with drbd v8.3.7 in Lucid fails to read its command line options and falls into an infinite loop. This bug is not in present in natty, but I humbly request an SRU to Lucid. This script can be called by DRBD to

[Bug 744293] [NEW] Infinite loop in helper LVM script for DRBD 8 in Lucid

2011-03-28 Thread Numérigraphe
Public bug reported: The script /usr/lib/drbd/snapshot-resync-target-lvm.sh shipped with drbd v8.3.7 in Lucid fails to read its command line options and falls into an infinite loop. This bug is not in present in natty, but I humbly request an SRU to Lucid. This script can be called by DRBD to

[Bug 715686] [NEW] tgtd should be respawned by init job

2011-02-09 Thread Numérigraphe
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tgt Th init job currently packaged for natty does not let tgtd be respawned whenever it fails or is killed. I humbly suggest you add a respawn stanza to /etc/init/tgt.conf Lionel Sausin ** Affects: tgt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 715686] [NEW] tgtd should be respawned by init job

2011-02-09 Thread Numérigraphe
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tgt Th init job currently packaged for natty does not let tgtd be respawned whenever it fails or is killed. I humbly suggest you add a respawn stanza to /etc/init/tgt.conf Lionel Sausin ** Affects: tgt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 715101] Re: pre-start script is executed before processing the event stopping ...

2011-02-09 Thread Numérigraphe
Dear Scott James Remnant, Thanks for making this clear. Lionel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715101 Title: pre-start script is executed before processing the event stopping ...

[Bug 715101] Re: pre-start script is executed before processing the event stopping ...

2011-02-09 Thread Numérigraphe
** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715101 Title: pre-start script is executed before processing the event stopping ... --

[Bug 715101] [NEW] pre-start script is executed before processing the event stopping ...

2011-02-08 Thread Numérigraphe
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: upstart Using upstart 0.6.5 from ubuntu Lucid, I watched the following stop sequence for a test job : Feb 8 10:26:46 my hostname init: test goal changed from start to stop Feb 8 10:26:46 my hostname init: test state changed from running to pre-stop

[Bug 282876] Re: drbd doesn't start on boot

2011-01-14 Thread Numérigraphe
For your information, a similar bug was introduced in the Lucid cycle and then fixed again in Maverick. In Lucid thhe default-start and default-sop are empty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to drbd8 in ubuntu.

[Bug 282876] Re: drbd doesn't start on boot

2011-01-14 Thread Numérigraphe
Dear SRU team, please would you care to push the fix to Lucid? Being an LTS, I think it's worth it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to drbd8 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282876 Title: drbd doesn't start on

[Bug 282876] Re: drbd doesn't start on boot

2011-01-14 Thread Numérigraphe
For your information, a similar bug was introduced in the Lucid cycle and then fixed again in Maverick. In Lucid thhe default-start and default-sop are empty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 282876] Re: drbd doesn't start on boot

2011-01-14 Thread Numérigraphe
Dear SRU team, please would you care to push the fix to Lucid? Being an LTS, I think it's worth it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282876 Title: drbd doesn't start on boot --

[Bug 351536] Re: files on read-only win98 shares can't be opened on Hardy using cifs

2010-11-12 Thread Numérigraphe
With Hardy getting old and Lucid beeing unaffected, please feel free to mark this won't fix for Hardy. Lionel. -- files on read-only win98 shares can't be opened on Hardy using cifs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351536 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 562484] Re: Cannot suspend with a USB3 port (HP8540w)

2010-10-21 Thread Numérigraphe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 522998 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522998 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 522998 XHCI (USB 3.0) kernel Module Prevents Suspend * You can subscribe to bug 522998 by following this link:

[Bug 91389] Re: Support for more than one VPN simultaneously

2010-10-20 Thread Numérigraphe
MaksimKa, Koen Calliauw, please use the button this affects me too, not comments. -- Support for more than one VPN simultaneously https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/91389 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 514129] Re: Network Manager - wireless is disabled, after suspend/hibernate

2010-09-05 Thread Numérigraphe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 524454 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524454 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 524454 Networking is disabled on boot (usually after suspend/hibernate) -- Network Manager - wireless is disabled, after suspend/hibernate

[Bug 545538] Re: unable to add username to bookmarked SSH connection

2010-05-21 Thread Numérigraphe
The version in lucid-proposed looks fine, fixes the bug at my end. Thanks for your support. Lionel -- unable to add username to bookmarked SSH connection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 138743] Re: The utility at does not work. Always reports the error, Cannot give away file: Operation not permitted

2010-05-21 Thread Numérigraphe
This happend to me on a Hardy server hosting vmware server 2.0. Don't know what exactly broke. apt-get remove --purge at apt-get install ubuntu-standard fixed it. Lionel ** Also affects: at (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: launchpad-report-tool

[Bug 545538] Re: unable to add username to bookmarked SSH connection

2010-04-29 Thread Numérigraphe
** Changed in: vinagre (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- unable to add username to bookmarked SSH connection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 411588] Re: libitext-java shouldn't recommend libitext-java-gcj

2010-04-15 Thread Numérigraphe
I agree this should be fixed. Has it been discussed upstream? Lionel. -- libitext-java shouldn't recommend libitext-java-gcj https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411588 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 396992] Re: libitext-java shouldn't depend on openjdk-6

2010-04-15 Thread Numérigraphe
sun-java6 is not in lucid anymore. If you installed it from outside Ubuntu (like the official Java site), you may consider forcing to install without the dependencies. I have got sun-java6-* packages installed but when i try to install libitext-java it marks gcj-4.4 with its dependencies to

[Bug 563695] [NEW] libitext with java-healess

2010-04-15 Thread Numérigraphe
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libitext-java libitext-java depends on default-jre, but should'nt it depend on default-jre-headless? Lionel ** Affects: libitext-java (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- libitext with java-healess

[Bug 429519] Re: orm.py needs to use libxml2 rather than pyxml

2009-10-28 Thread Numérigraphe
Is it such a great idea to add a new dependency for the stable release ? Will it still work on hardy LTS ? Will it not break the server for those who have no problem and pull from the bzr ? Is it worth the risk when karmic is not even an LTS ? Can't this be done as a debdiff in a PPA and the

[Bug 429519] Re: orm.py needs to use libxml2 rather than pyxml

2009-10-28 Thread Numérigraphe
I meant and then proposed for inclusion - sorry. Lionel -- orm.py needs to use libxml2 rather than pyxml https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429519 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 351536] [NEW] files on read-only win98 shares can't be opened on Hardy using cifs

2009-03-30 Thread Numérigraphe
Public bug reported: It looks like Hardy can't open files on Windows 98 shares when they are shared for read only. Steps to reproduce : - Create a read-only share a folder on Win98 host. - on Hardy, as root : - mount -t cifs //WINHOST/SHARENAME /mnt/ -o

<    1   2