This is to be expected, you have configured a mirror but you are using
an arm64 machine, which is only served by ports.ubuntu.com.
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
Cherry-picking https://github.com/sahib/rmlint/pull/557 is not enough. I
am going to package 2.10.2 instead of bisecting the additional needed
commit(s).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2
There is no deja Dup / backup-restore app installed in my 24.04 system.
What happen!?!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066670
Title:
Could not understand duplicity version.
To manage
** Changed in: dracut
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065180
Title:
performance regression in dracut-install 060
To manage notifications about this bug
I have back tracked to the duplicate bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958191 and followed the suggested fix,
which was patch grub boot;-
Patched my grub boot file GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash
i915.enable_dc=0 intel_idle.max_cstate=2"
sudo update-grub and restarted machine
Works a
** Summary changed:
- Jammy to Noble upgrade lost pivate use area Ubuntu symbol
+ Jammy to Noble upgrade lost private use area Ubuntu symbol
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064576
Titl
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => linux-signed-hwe-6.5 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067009
Title:
installed linux-image-6.5.0-21-generic package post-installation
sc
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => thunderbird (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066971
Title:
Update from 23.10 to 24.04 failed
To manage notifications about this bug go t
** Changed in: nodejs (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065919
Title:
Please merge nodejs 20.13.1+dfsg-1 into Oracular
To manage noti
This bug was fixed in the package node-undici - 5.28.4+dfsg1+~cs23.12.11-2
Sponsored for Zixing Liu (liushuyu-011)
---
node-undici (5.28.4+dfsg1+~cs23.12.11-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload
* Fix fix-wasm-build.patch
* Clean obj-* directory
* Build with upstream scrip
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2060456 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060456
Duplicate of 2060456.
To resolve this, please see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-android-
installers/+bug/2060456
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2060456
package google-
Installed 20240318.git3b128b60-0ubuntu2.1, with oem-1023 kernel, audio
works fine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064064
Title:
Add support of TAS2781 amp of audio
To manage notific
** Bug watch added: github.com/dracut-ng/dracut-ng/issues #316
https://github.com/dracut-ng/dracut-ng/issues/316
** Also affects: dracut via
https://github.com/dracut-ng/dracut-ng/issues/316
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~18.04) for
bionic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390x)
update-manager/1:18.04.12 (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page li
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~18.04) for
bionic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390x)
update-manager/1:18.04.12 (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page li
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~18.04) for
bionic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390x)
update-manager/1:18.04.12 (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page li
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~18.04) for
bionic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390x)
update-manager/1:18.04.12 (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page li
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~18.04) for
bionic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390x)
update-manager/1:18.04.12 (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page li
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~18.04) for
bionic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390x)
update-manager/1:18.04.12 (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page li
** Summary changed:
- performance regression in dracut-install
+ performance regression in dracut-install 060
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065180
Title:
performance regression in
** Tags added: verification-needed-noble
** Tags removed: verification-needed-noble
** Tags added: verification-done-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064064
Title:
Add support
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~20.04) for
focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failure
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~20.04) for
focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failure
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~20.04) for
focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failure
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~20.04) for
focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failure
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~20.04) for
focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failure
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~20.04) for
focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failure
Why is ApportLog empty? Did you remove the content there? Otherwise it
means that /var/log/apport was empty (despite apport collecting
crashes).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066995
T
Can you provide the journal log from during that time frame? Did that
application crash multiple times?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066995
Title:
apport-gtk keeps prompting to rep
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067015
Title:
package linux-headers-6.5.0-35-generic 6.5.0-35.35 failed to
install/upgrade: installed linux-hea
[Expired for kicad (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: kicad (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1880447
T
[Expired for kwin (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: kwin (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983198
Tit
[Expired for scribus-doc (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: scribus-doc (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
extruct has no autopkgtest. How about adding at least autopkgtest-pkg-
python to catch those kind of issues earlier next time?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066997
Title:
gourmand c
Public bug reported:
-
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
Package: linux-headers-6.5.0-35-generic 6.5.0-35.35
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-28.29-generic 6.5.13
Uname: Linux 6.5.0-28-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5
AptOrdering:
google-chrome-stable:amd64: Install
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067013
Title:
package libpam-modules 1.3.1-5ubuntu4.7 failed to install/upgrade: new
libpam-modules:amd64 packa
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~22.04) for
jammy have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (s390x)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390x)
Please visit the excuses page l
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~23.10) for
mantic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (s390x)
update-manager/unknown (s390x)
Please visit the excuses page listed b
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~22.04) for
jammy have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (s390x)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390x)
Please visit the excuses page l
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~16.04) for
xenial have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (arm64, i386)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate t
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~24.04) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~23.10) for
mantic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (s390x)
update-manager/unknown (s390x)
Please visit the excuses page listed b
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~16.04) for
xenial have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (arm64, i386)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate t
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~24.04) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~22.04) for
jammy have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (s390x)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390x)
Please visit the excuses page l
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~23.10) for
mantic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (s390x)
update-manager/unknown (s390x)
Please visit the excuses page listed b
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~16.04) for
xenial have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (arm64, i386)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate t
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~24.04) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~22.04) for
jammy have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (s390x)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390x)
Please visit the excuses page l
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~23.10) for
mantic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (s390x)
update-manager/unknown (s390x)
Please visit the excuses page listed b
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~16.04) for
xenial have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (arm64, i386)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate t
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~24.04) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~22.04) for
jammy have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (s390x)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390x)
Please visit the excuses page l
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~23.10) for
mantic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (s390x)
update-manager/unknown (s390x)
Please visit the excuses page listed b
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~16.04) for
xenial have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (arm64, i386)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate t
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~24.04) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~22.04) for
jammy have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (s390x)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390x)
Please visit the excuses page l
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~23.10) for
mantic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (s390x)
update-manager/unknown (s390x)
Please visit the excuses page listed b
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~16.04) for
xenial have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (arm64, i386)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate t
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (32.2~24.04) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (s390
Public bug reported:
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/libpam-modules_1.4.0-11ubuntu2.4_amd64.deb (--unpack):
new libpam-modules:amd64 package pre-installation script subprocess returned
error exit status 2
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #483988
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483988
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306438
Title:
No undo for deleting a contact from ad
*** Bug 273347 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306438
Title:
No undo for deleting a contact from address book
To manage notifications a
*** Bug 266100 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306438
Title:
No undo for deleting a contact from address book
To manage notifications a
*** Bug 297947 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306438
Title:
No undo for deleting a contact from address book
To manage notifications a
*** Bug 257599 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306438
Title:
No undo for deleting a contact from address book
To manage notifications a
added based on [comment
#0](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483988#c0) (last line)
in bug 483988
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306438
Title:
No undo for deleting a conta
Although alleviated by the confirmation window, there is still a _data loss_
aspect:
If the user was too quick to confirm the deletion, there is no way to get the
data back. It's lost forever.
That's where the undo feature would help.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
During upgrade from 23.10 to 24.04 LTS
** Description changed:
- Ubuntu 6.5.0-17.17-generic 6.5.8
+ Version : Ubuntu 6.5.0-17.17-generic 6.5.8
+
+ >> sudo apt upgrade
+ Reading package lists... Done
+ Building dependency tree... Done
+ Reading state informa
Public bug reported:
In 24.04 (kubuntu, cinnamon and gnome) the sound card is detected and
the internal speaker works. The microphone is detected but does not
record sound. Hardware is OK as it works in Windows 11. Speaker
sometimes will not work after reboot, but can be turned back on with
pavuco
I think we fixed this in December 2022:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-
drivers-510/+bug/1997087
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cve-
tracker/tree/active/CVE-2022-34673#n360
Thanks
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
** CVE added: ht
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 6.5.0-17.17-generic 6.5.8
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Attachment added: "lspci-vnvn.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067009/+attachment/5782052/+files/lspci-vnvn.log
--
You received this bug notification bec
** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: Fix Committ
** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => In Prog
kernel: 6.9.1
linux-firmware: 20240510
For me bluetooth still does not work on boot, the timeout error is no
longer shown in the logs but without running that reset script the
journal will just endlessly repeat these messages and the bluetooth will
never work. I think the 'fix' that was put in fo
This bug was fixed in the package itstool - 2.0.6-3
---
itstool (2.0.6-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload
* d/p/fix_warnings_1076134.patch: fix py3.12 SyntaxWarnings
(Closes: #1076134, LP: #2061229)
-- Simon Chopin Wed, 22 May 2024 17:33:55 +0200
** Changed in: its
** Changed in: apache2 (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261198
Title:
Add UFW profile integration with apache2
To manage notifications about this
** Changed in: btas (Debian)
Status: Fix Released => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2007960
Title:
tiledarray 1.0.0-1 FTBFS
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
Public bug reported:
```
GNU Image Manipulation Program version 2.10.36
git-describe: GIMP_2_10_36
Build: unknown rev 0 for linux
# C compiler #
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/13/lto-wrapper
OFFLOAD_TAR
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-restricted-modules (6.5.0-41.41)
for mantic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-470/unknown (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate
** Description changed:
* Introduction
- DPLL pin was exposed in upstream and backed into Bluefield kernel. But since
there are some other value was not needed in Bluefield kernel, they are not in
current Bluefield kernel. This may cause the value of IFLA_DPLL_PIN value be
not same as upstrea
Wow ~ Thank you for your explanation and deep dive.
😘
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066117
Title:
sysstat.service is enabled by default on 24.04 lts
To manage notifications about t
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ The sysstat services are not enabled by default in jammy. They are
+ enabled by default in noble not due to any packaging change, but because
+ the package is now seeded and the services are processed by systemd
+ preset on the first system boot. This is (
Thanks for the information, hideou. I believe I understand the issue
now.
For noble (24.04), a set of performance engineering tools is installed
by default. This set includes sysstat.
This means that starting from 24.04, sysstat is now a seeded package and
is included in (some) ubuntu images by d
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~bryce/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+git/apache2/+merge/466357
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045055
Title:
link in default index.h
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1071705
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071705
** Also affects: apache2 (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071705
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification beca
Public bug reported:
Hi,
could it be possible that
/lib/systemd/system/zfs.target
has a wrong dependency
WantedBy=multi-user.target
and shouldn't it be wanted by local-fs.target instead?
Reason I'm asking:
I do have to install a daemon on several machines, where a particular
work directory
Public bug reported:
The font chooser in gnome-tweaks always seems to forget the chosen font
- both when run for the first time on a fresh install AND after choosing
a particular font - see the attached video which shows this in more
detail.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: g
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+git/multipath-tools/+merge/466356
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286
Title:
Multi
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+git/ec2-hibinit-agent/+merge/466349
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+git/ec2-hibinit-agent/+merge/466350
** Merge proposal linked:
Please note that for virtio/virt-manager, setting this envionment
variable in ~/.profile may be a workaround.
export GSK_RENDERER=gl
this at least fixes Files
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
I get this messages and system freezes and I need to restart.
Ubuntu 24.04
Dell G15 5511
GNOME 46.0 + x11
I know the crashes shouldn't be related, but in some way they are because so
many people reported. I kept the kernelooops running to check if I can get
anything.
--
You received this bug no
** Tags added: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066995
Title:
apport-gtk keeps prompting to report crashes in a loop
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
http
Public bug reported:
ARM support needed a one line change, found upstream at
https://github.com/aws/amazon-ec2-hibinit-
agent/commit/ab70d14fce4d9f05d54b363a0d849c5169e01ffa
** Affects: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Assignee: Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz)
Status: In
Hello KolAflash, thanks for writing; the wiki page in question has this
suggestion:
# echo "UMASK=0077" >> /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
Which should take care of the secrets in case the administrator chooses
to use this mechanism to automatically supply keys to LUKS, right?
Thanks
--
Yo
Public bug reported:
lowforehead@lowforehead:~$ sudo apt update
[sudo] password for lowforehead:
Atteint :1 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble InRelease
Atteint :2 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports noble InRelease
Atteint :3 https://repo.waydro.id noble InRelease
Probably fixed by:
extruct (0.16.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium
* Add upstream patch to add support for python3 lxml >= 5.2.0 and
python3-lxml-html-clean to Depends.
-- Christian Marillat Fri, 19 Apr 2024 11:44:13
+0200
** Information type changed from Private to Public
** Changed in:
Public bug reported:
Calculating the changes
Calculating the changes
Could not calculate the upgrade
An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade.
This was likely caused by:
* Unofficial software packages not provided by Ubuntu
Please use the tool 'ppa-purge' from the ppa-p
Public bug reported:
/var/crash has the following contents:
-rw-r- 1 vorlon vorlon 107490 May 23 16:05 _usr_bin_gourmand.1000.crash
-rw-rw-r-- 1 vorlon vorlon0 May 23 16:06 _usr_bin_gourmand.1000.upload
-rw--- 1 whoopsie whoopsie 5 May 23 16:07
_usr_bin_gourmand.1000.u
1 - 100 of 346 matches
Mail list logo
